The homophobic thread :>

[bannination]

A bit off topic in a way, but an amazing video for Christians and non-christians to watch.


Hitler can't help you.




I don't see how anyone could objectively deny the truth presented in this video.

[Wneglia]

Nazis are not and will not ever be protected from discrimination. No one is forced to abet a political ideology they disagree with.

If Satanists can be denied then Christians can be denied by Muslims, Muslims can be denied by Jews, Jews can be denied by Christians, and any believer or religious ceremony can be denied by atheists. Is that really the road we wish our laws and government enforcers to go down? Better for the businessperson to just take their "tainted" profit and give it to the hate group of their choosing.

It doesn't matter in the long run. Bigoted businesses either will fail to get bigoted law passed, will lose in the courts, will see the laws repealed by the growing tolerant majority, or will see their businesses fail due to boycotts. The writing on the wall is clear, all the haters have left is hurting as many loving people as they can with their pitiful death throes before they're relegated to complete irrelevancy.

So it is OK to discriminate against those whom you disagree politically?

[JTA]

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/news ... -pork.html

Muslim staff working for Marks & Spencer have been given permission to refuse to serve customers buying alcohol or pork products

Its policy decision has highlighted a split among the big food retailers over whether religious staff should be excused certain jobs.

Not the US, but still interesting. What's everyone's thoughts on this in light of the discussion of a Christians refusal to make a wedding cake that's going to be used as part of a gay wedding?

[bannination]

Off the top of my head I don't mind a retailer choosing to accommodate the religion of employees if customers are able to get the goods or services from other employees. But, that would be an employer's choice, just as a different employer could choose not to sell alcohol or pork at all for religious reasons. The issue arises when certain groups are denied goods or services entirely that the retailer does sell to others.

I strive to provide excellent healthcare to everyone, regardless of the groups they are part of unless their individual behavior gives me legitimate reason to do otherwise. Even then I can't deny them or give substandard care, I have to get someone else to take over.

That's a big if and creates a management nightmare for small companies. Scheduling is a tough enough process, scheduling based on different religions and their beliefs.... wow....

But like you said... as long as everyone can get their goods and services and if the employer is ok with that nightmare.

Wouldn't you have to discriminate during the hiring process? I mean you couldn't have too many of this or that religious type otherwise you may not be able to serve your customers.

[homerfobe]

I hear how much you fantasize that I'm a gay male, and I pity it. As we're discussing on another thread, your homophobia is merely a pathetic denial of your own latent homosexuality.

Fantasize my ass. You have to be a full blown gay queer, otherwise you wouldn't get your ass in a sling every time you respond to my post.
Then you call me a queer. Does that mean you love me too, queer-lover?

[homerfobe]

One day down the road, incest and sex with children will be tested in the courts as a form of an alternate lifestyle.

It's already starting. The court has ruled that it's not illegal to take photos up a womans skirt. More legal perversion. If I should ever catch a bastard doing that to my wife or daughter, he better start worrying about losing his constitutional rights in a serious manner.

[homerfobe]

The court has ruled that it's not illegal to take photos up a womans skirt. More legal perversion.

The MA court ruled that the old law was poorly written and the Governor has already signed new law making up-skirt pics illegal. You've screwed up, again. Is this another instance where you've gotten confused about clear news reporting and are you going to run away from your flub, again?

I'm not running, stupid. I posted that before they decided they made a big opps. You screwed up again.

[homerfobe]

Transgender Woman Sues CrossFit Over Competition
LINK




They got it all straightened out. They thought it was an escapee from a circus freak show.
One damn ugly 'woman'.

[GoCubsGo]

Is ‘Frozen’ The Gayest Movie of the Year?

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2 ... -year.html

[Boatrocker]

Is ‘Frozen’ The Gayest Movie of the Year?

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2 ... -year.html

Sure, and some sad people see Jesus in water stains and Mother Theresa in grilled cheese sandwiches. Latent, suppressed homosexuals see "gay" everywhere; look at ol' homotool.

[JTA]

Is ‘Frozen’ The Gayest Movie of the Year?

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2 ... -year.html

The only kids that will get a gay message out of it are the ones that adored it and have now been told by their wingnut parents that it's gay.

Here's what pisses me off: It's a damn kids movie. I really doubt some little kid who hasn't even hit puberty yet is going to be turned gay by a movie that probably doesn't even have any gay subliminal messages to begin with. Why does everything need to be sexualized? Let kids have their innocence.

[JTA]

Is ‘Frozen’ The Gayest Movie of the Year?

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2 ... -year.html

The only kids that will get a gay message out of it are the ones that adored it and have now been told by their wingnut parents that it's gay.

Here's what pisses me off: It's a damn kids movie. I really doubt some little kid who hasn't even hit puberty yet is going to be turned gay by a movie that probably doesn't even have any gay subliminal messages to begin with. Why does everything need to be sexualized? Let kids have their innocence.

On another note - I read some article a few days ago that explained how humans have a tendency to find patterns even where none exist. We're hardwired to do so. This is an example of that. Those people's opposition to homosexuality is very central to their worldview. Because it's so central, they search deep and hard for patterns in everything (even where none exist) to affirm their beliefs. I guess you'd call it confirmation bias.

[JTA]

Fwiw, children's stories are sexualized from a very early age

True true.

[neoplacebo]

I used to wonder as a kid what Snow White might be doing with those dwarfs, and also wondered if any sort of aids were involved, such as well, never mind......

[GoCubsGo]

Beware Batman and Robin

[homerfobe]

I bet your bubbling over with pride aren't you? Makes me want to sing the Star Spangled Banner from the highest hill. Or a big ass soapbox anyway. Wow, you wrote to and got an answer from a fag-supporting senator! Touch you. (not)
I'm sure you haven't noticed the rise in sexual deviations in the news in recent months. Along with the Faggots United screaming their asses off, there's been a rise in pedophile and child porno arrests. Yep, sexual perverts are crawling out of the woodwork, and mark my words, one day the child perverts will claim discrimination and sex with kids will be legalized. Probably not in our lifetime, but who expected that queers could one day marry and priss arm in arm down the street in public?
An adult who would have sex with a child should be publicly horsewhipped to death. Oh yeah, and this silly shit your posting about me being a goddamn closet queer based on your research shit, is nothing but pure horseshit put out by those who use this to retaliate and attempt to shame and ridicule queer haters. I will tell you this. I am not a goddamn stinking ass faggot. I hate the sons of bitches and their female counterparts, I hate a goddamn pedophile as well.
If you want to cozy up to fags, twat twinkies and other deviates, have at it. Not me.

[homerfobe]

I hear your ongoing shrieking denials of the science demonstrating that extreme homophobes like you are much more likely to have gay tendencies, and I pity them. No one here buys it. Clearly, your protestations are a desperate attempt to convince yourself. Good luck.

And we hear your ongoing shrieking denial. Duh. I deny my tendencies and you refuse to admit your shameful orientation. Ashamed of your boyfriend or something? Clearly, your protestations are a desperate attempt to convince yourself. Your not fooling anyone. You screwed up again. Oh wait, your already screwed up. (no pun intended of course)

[homerfobe]

Clearly, your protests are a desperate attempt to convince yourself. Your not fooling anyone. You screwed up again.

Why should I comment further on the news stories? You've already shit yourself shitless to prove no one is right but you. I'll have to concede, your stink is overwhelming. As far as your orientation, I don't give a rats ass what you are, one way or the other. You don't do a damn thing for me other than provide entertainment by fueling this forum with your dumbass superiority complex. But we can all tell a Ford from a Chevrolet. Go wash you flag now, it's soiled from your trysts.

[k9nanny]

http://news.yahoo.com/boston-mayor-miss ... ector.html

Parade organizers argue that including openly gay marchers would be in conflict with their Catholic heritage.

About that heritage... St. Patrick was a vicious, murdering dude. The bigotry displayed by some of the parade organizers honors St. P's bigotry, though I doubt they recognize that.

[Wneglia]

About that heritage... St. Patrick was a vicious, murdering dude.

The metaphorical interpretation of Druids being the snakes driven out of Ireland by St. Patrick (not murdered) Link
has been challenged by modern Pagan scholars.

"For years now, several individuals have worked to debunk this idea as well. (Metaphorical Interpretation) It seems the “snakes = Druids” metaphor is a relatively recent invention, as was the idea that Patrick “drove them out.” P. Sufenas Virius Lupus, a Celtic Reconstructionist Pagan (and scholar) who has extensively studied Irish myth and folklore, had this to say on the subject.


“Unfortunately, this isn’t true, and the hagiographies of St. Patrick did not include this particular “miracle” until quite late, relatively speaking (his earliest hagiographies are from the 7th century, whereas this incident doesn’t turn up in any of them until the 11th century). St. Patrick’s reputation as the one who Christianized Ireland is seriously over-rated and overstated, as there were others that came before him (and after him), and the process seemed to be well on its way at least a century before the “traditional” date given as his arrival, 432 CE, because Irish colonists (yes, you read that right!) in southern Wales, Cornwall, and elsewhere in Roman and sub-Roman Britain had already come into contact with Christians and carried the religion back with them when visiting home.”