and the motive is.....?

Generally an unmoderated forum for discussion of pretty much any topic. The focus however, is usually politics.
Post Reply
User avatar
billy.pilgrim
Admiral
Posts: 15632
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 1:44 pm

and the motive is.....?

Unread post by billy.pilgrim »

Why does anyone (and in this case – everyone in the media, except glen beck) seem to think that anyone would take over a plane, incapacitate or murder the passengers, fly around radar, and then fly it to the middle of nowhere until it ran out of fuel?

And the motive is…?

This is almost as bullshit, as, Jim Garrow, saying, - Obama Blew Up Missing Malaysia Airlines Plane –
See more at: http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/g ... 98mC0.dpuf


Actions have motives and none of the speculation I’ve heard so far offers any sort of remote possible motive; at least garrow has a motive – idiotic as it may be – it is a motive

Another possible motive may be, steal the plane, kill the passengers by flying to 45,000 ft, land in a remote area, hide and paint the plane, equip it as the ultimate dirty bomb and a quick flight with full tanks to tel Aviv, or new York with near empty tanks

it will make the news again
Trump: “We had the safest border in the history of our country - or at least recorded history. I guess maybe a thousand years ago it was even better.”

User avatar
rstrong
Captain
Posts: 5889
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:32 am
Location: Winnipeg, MB

Re: and the motive is.....?

Unread post by rstrong »

idiotic as it may be – it is a motive
No, it doesn't rise above crack-addled delusion even enough to be considered even an idiotic motive.

The "20 technology nerds" worked for a company based in Austin Texas. The US government routinely stops US companies from exporting even non-classified technology, and can order its citizens to do damn near anything it wants when it comes to national security. Even in Malaysia, it could have stopped those technicians from getting on a plane with a simple phone call.

If the technicians had Chinese classified technology, killing them neither denies it to the Chinese nor obtains it for the US.

As for the place being "fly by wire", NO, that does not mean that it could be flown remotely. Nor does it mean that the radios and oxygen systems could be turned off remotely.

User avatar
homerfobe
Ensign
Posts: 1565
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 9:37 am
Location: All over more than anywhere else.

Re: and the motive is.....?

Unread post by homerfobe »

billy.pilgrim wrote:Why does anyone seem to think that anyone would take over a plane, incapacitate or murder the passengers, fly around radar, and then fly it to the middle of nowhere until it ran out of fuel? And the motive is…?--------it will make the news again
Now ask yourself why anyone would strap high velocity explosives to themselves to maim and kill as many innocent people as they can, as well as blowing their own ass all to hell. If it is determined to be the pilot's doings, which it may be, he will be looked upon as a martyr in the name of his stupid ass religion. If the pilot is at fault, he knew it will eventually come to light and his name will go down in history, and he will be hailed a hero to his cause. All them virgins, you know.

I'm willing to bet the pilot is at fault.
Proudly Telling It Like It Is: In Your Face! Whether You Like It Or Not!

User avatar
rstrong
Captain
Posts: 5889
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:32 am
Location: Winnipeg, MB

Re: and the motive is.....?

Unread post by rstrong »

homerfobe wrote:If it is determined to be the pilot's doings, which it may be, he will be looked upon as a martyr in the name of his stupid ass religion.
So you're saying that he's Christian?

Christian Science Monitor: Americans are more approving of terrorist attacks against civilians than any major Muslim country except for Nigeria.
The survey, conducted in December 2006 by the University of Maryland's prestigious Program on International Public Attitudes, shows that only 46 percent of Americans think that "bombing and other attacks intentionally aimed at civilians" are "never justified," while 24 percent believe these attacks are "often or sometimes justified."

Contrast those numbers with 2006 polling results from the world's most-populous Muslim countries – Indonesia, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Nigeria. Terror Free Tomorrow, the organization I lead, found that 74 percent of respondents in Indonesia agreed that terrorist attacks are "never justified"; in Pakistan, that figure was 86 percent; in Bangladesh, 81 percent.
For every Muslim group you can find that supports such a thing, you can find - even in modern times - a Christian group with a similar attitude.

User avatar
k9nanny
General
Posts: 777
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 3:11 pm

Re: and the motive is.....?

Unread post by k9nanny »

rstrong wrote: As for the place being "fly by wire", NO, that does not mean that it could be flown remotely. Nor does it mean that the radios and oxygen systems could be turned off remotely.
Mr. Finch could do it. :mrgreen:
Se Non Ora, Quando?

User avatar
billy.pilgrim
Admiral
Posts: 15632
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 1:44 pm

Re: and the motive is.....?

Unread post by billy.pilgrim »

rstrong wrote:
idiotic as it may be – it is a motive
No, it doesn't rise above crack-addled delusion even enough to be considered even an idiotic motive.

The "20 technology nerds" worked for a company based in Austin Texas. The US government routinely stops US companies from exporting even non-classified technology, and can order its citizens to do damn near anything it wants when it comes to national security. Even in Malaysia, it could have stopped those technicians from getting on a plane with a simple phone call.

If the technicians had Chinese classified technology, killing them neither denies it to the Chinese nor obtains it for the US.

As for the place being "fly by wire", NO, that does not mean that it could be flown remotely. Nor does it mean that the radios and oxygen systems could be turned off remotely.

sorry, but it was an attempt at sarcasm - yes, gannon is an idiot on a grand scale and his mumblings should not have been repeated, even in my poor attempt at sarcasm.

But still, what we are hearing doesn’t begin to make any sense because the description of the turn, the systems shutdown, the altitude change rules out technical problems and there is no motive.

Why isn’t anyone even discussing how this plane may be ultimately used? - faux has been comparing it to the tv show Lost and the whacko Christians are claiming god did it as a rapture warm-up, so wild speculation is alive and well. So what about a little speculation about how a stolen jet could be used?
Trump: “We had the safest border in the history of our country - or at least recorded history. I guess maybe a thousand years ago it was even better.”

User avatar
billy.pilgrim
Admiral
Posts: 15632
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 1:44 pm

Re: and the motive is.....?

Unread post by billy.pilgrim »

homerfobe wrote:
billy.pilgrim wrote:Why does anyone seem to think that anyone would take over a plane, incapacitate or murder the passengers, fly around radar, and then fly it to the middle of nowhere until it ran out of fuel? And the motive is…?--------it will make the news again
Now ask yourself why anyone would strap high velocity explosives to themselves to maim and kill as many innocent people as they can, as well as blowing their own ass all to hell. If it is determined to be the pilot's doings, which it may be, he will be looked upon as a martyr in the name of his stupid ass religion. If the pilot is at fault, he knew it will eventually come to light and his name will go down in history, and he will be hailed a hero to his cause. All them virgins, you know.

I'm willing to bet the pilot is at fault.
what? you really think he passed up a chance to use the plane as a weapon (for all to see and recognize) in order to secretly martyr himself in a way that no one will ever recognize – damn man – you could qualify for the faux and bff morning show
Trump: “We had the safest border in the history of our country - or at least recorded history. I guess maybe a thousand years ago it was even better.”

Post Reply