Surviving a nuclear attack.

Generally an unmoderated forum for discussion of pretty much any topic. The focus however, is usually politics.
Post Reply
bannination
Captain
Posts: 5656
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:58 am
Location: Hendersonville
Contact:

Surviving a nuclear attack.

Unread post by bannination »

It's long, but it could save your life.



User avatar
Dryer Vent
Pilot Officer
Posts: 149
Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2012 1:55 pm

Re: Surviving a nuclear attack.

Unread post by Dryer Vent »

Image

bannination
Captain
Posts: 5656
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:58 am
Location: Hendersonville
Contact:

Re: Surviving a nuclear attack.

Unread post by bannination »

Dryer Vent wrote:Image
Yeah.... the government's instructions on keeping a biological threat out of your home by using duct tape reminded me of their past incompetence on nuclear attacks.

I guess it's not really about the instructions is it? It's about keeping stupid people from panicking, or keeping them busy.

User avatar
rstrong
Captain
Posts: 5889
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:32 am
Location: Winnipeg, MB

Re: Surviving a nuclear attack.

Unread post by rstrong »

A few years ago Turkey had an earthquake that collapsed several schools in an area where the schools were the only big cement structures around. The classrooms had desks like the ones shown above, and the kids were trained to hide under them.

Lesson learned: Many kids were crushed under their desks when the desk legs collapsed under the weight of the cement floor above. Kids who hid *between* the desks were far more likely to survive.

User avatar
rstrong
Captain
Posts: 5889
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:32 am
Location: Winnipeg, MB

Re: Surviving a nuclear attack.

Unread post by rstrong »

Worst Response To A Crisis, 1985:
From a readers' Q and A column in TV GUIDE: "If we get involved in a nuclear war, would the electromagnetic pulses from exploding bombs damage my videotapes?"

User avatar
rstrong
Captain
Posts: 5889
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:32 am
Location: Winnipeg, MB

Re: Surviving a nuclear attack.

Unread post by rstrong »

"We've got bad news and worse news. First the bad news: A UNC-CH poll showed that as many as one in five Southerners believes 'The South would be a lot better off if it had won the War Between the States. Now the worse news: A private survey found that South Carolina has more nuclear warheads than any other state."
- Lew Powell

JTA
Commander
Posts: 3898
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 4:04 pm

Re: Surviving a nuclear attack.

Unread post by JTA »

I grew up near a nuclear plant. There were signs in a few locations that warned residents to tune in to station XXXX if sirens sounded for more than three minutes, I guess for evacuation instructions.

After 9-11 everyone was freaking out thinking a hijacker might try to crash a plane into it since it's in a highly populated region.
You aren't doing it wrong if no one knows what you are doing.

User avatar
homerfobe
Ensign
Posts: 1565
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 9:37 am
Location: All over more than anywhere else.

Re: Surviving a nuclear attack.

Unread post by homerfobe »

Seems as though the basic instructions have been ignored. Earthquake damages are quite different from projected nuclear damage.
Stick your head between your knees and kiss your a s s goodby.
Proudly Telling It Like It Is: In Your Face! Whether You Like It Or Not!

User avatar
homerfobe
Ensign
Posts: 1565
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 9:37 am
Location: All over more than anywhere else.

Re: Surviving a nuclear attack.

Unread post by homerfobe »

Vrede wrote:
homerfobe wrote:Seems as though the basic instructions have been ignored. Earthquake damages are quite different from projected nuclear damage.

Seems as though you ignored basic comprehension. rstrong was clearly referring to earthquakes which, as a matter of fact, are not that dissimilar from nuclear blast damage.

Stick your head between your knees and kiss your a s s goodby.

Is that what you learned in the Navy, or is it just something else you're confused about? I've been taught quite different in disaster response.
Not that I'm making any extrapolations, but it's noteworthy that the only two military lifers we've had in this forum are as immature and foolish as homerfobe and "Reality".
That's a joke older than you are stupid, but it's noteworthy that you are more gullible and idiotic than you're been given credit for, and that's scraping the bottom.
Last edited by homerfobe on Sun Jan 27, 2013 4:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Proudly Telling It Like It Is: In Your Face! Whether You Like It Or Not!

User avatar
Wneglia
Midshipman
Posts: 1103
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 7:00 pm

Re: Surviving a nuclear attack.

Unread post by Wneglia »


User avatar
homerfobe
Ensign
Posts: 1565
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 9:37 am
Location: All over more than anywhere else.

Re: Surviving a nuclear attack.

Unread post by homerfobe »

Vrede wrote: I know the joke, dummy, but you're the one that confused nuclear blast damage with thermal and radiation damage and you're the one that posted the joke as truth in this discussion. Excuuuse me if I can't always tell the difference between when you're an idiot and just pretending to be one, the former is so, so common.
There's no excuuuse for you. You're so gullible, you can't discern truth from reality.

You're the idiot here, and you don't even have to pretend.
Proudly Telling It Like It Is: In Your Face! Whether You Like It Or Not!

User avatar
Dryer Vent
Pilot Officer
Posts: 149
Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2012 1:55 pm

Re: Surviving a nuclear attack.

Unread post by Dryer Vent »

The only two survivors of a nuclear war:

Cockroaches AND

Image

User avatar
Wneglia
Midshipman
Posts: 1103
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 7:00 pm

Re: Surviving a nuclear attack.

Unread post by Wneglia »

Vrede wrote:
Wneglia wrote:Life After Chernobyl

:mrgreen:
Yes, the animals that survive the radiation and can reproduce are doing well. That just shows that habitat loss and human depredation are even more limiting. It doesn't say anything about how the animals are being affected, how humans would be, or how the animal success would compare to a control population without humans and the radiation.

C'mon, you know how to set up legit radiation-related experiments, and which ones lend themselves to no conclusion at all.
Radio-Adaptation
Hormesis and evolution in action?

:mrgreen:

User avatar
homerfobe
Ensign
Posts: 1565
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 9:37 am
Location: All over more than anywhere else.

Re: Surviving a nuclear attack.

Unread post by homerfobe »

hee hee. I've been put on ignore! Something about heat in the kitchen and stuff comes to mind. :lol: :lol: :lol:
Proudly Telling It Like It Is: In Your Face! Whether You Like It Or Not!

User avatar
Boatrocker
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 2066
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 11:53 am
Location: Southeast of Disorder

Re: Surviving a nuclear attack.

Unread post by Boatrocker »

Unless it the most limited of exchanges, I don't want to survive a nuclear attack. I''d rather be right smack in the bullseye at ground zero.
People are crazy and times are strange. I'm locked in tight, I'm out of range.
I used to care, but, things have changed.

User avatar
rstrong
Captain
Posts: 5889
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:32 am
Location: Winnipeg, MB

Re: Surviving a nuclear attack.

Unread post by rstrong »

"The third angel blew his trumpet, and a great star fell from heaven, blazing like a torch, and it fell on a third of the rivers and on the springs of water. The name of the star is Wormwood. A third of the waters became wormwood, and many people died from the water, because it had been made bitter."
- Revelation 8:10-11

The Ukrainian word for Wormwood is Chernobyl.

User avatar
neoplacebo
Admiral of the Fleet
Posts: 12708
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 1:42 pm
Location: Kingsport TN

Re: Surviving a nuclear attack.

Unread post by neoplacebo »

Well, then we have quite a bit more excitement to anticipate.

Post Reply