The homophobic thread :>

Generally an unmoderated forum for discussion of pretty much any topic. The focus however, is usually politics.
Post Reply
bannination
Captain
Posts: 5653
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:58 am
Location: Hendersonville
Contact:

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by bannination »

Image

bannination
Captain
Posts: 5653
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:58 am
Location: Hendersonville
Contact:

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by bannination »

Image

bannination
Captain
Posts: 5653
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:58 am
Location: Hendersonville
Contact:

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by bannination »

Image

Probably accurate for most.

User avatar
O Really
Admiral
Posts: 23582
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by O Really »

Vrede wrote: A sane and fiscally responsible Republican - Who knew that there were any left?
And one well aware that his re-election chances are a toss-up. Coming down hard on marriage equality now would pretty much ice his skids.

User avatar
homerfobe
Ensign
Posts: 1565
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 9:37 am
Location: All over more than anywhere else.

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by homerfobe »

Vrede wrote:
Pennsylvania won't appeal same-sex marriage case

...Gov. Tom Corbett's decision Wednesday means that same-sex marriage will remain legal in Pennsylvania, without the threat that a higher court will reinstate the ban...

"As a Roman Catholic, the traditional teaching of my faith has not wavered," Corbett said. "I continue to maintain the belief that marriage is between one man and one woman. My duties as governor require that I follow the laws as interpreted by the courts and make a judgment as to the likelihood of a successful appeal."...
A sane and fiscally responsible Republican - Who knew that there were any left?

Faggotry: It's not just for faggots anymore.
Proudly Telling It Like It Is: In Your Face! Whether You Like It Or Not!

User avatar
indago
Pilot Officer
Posts: 220
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2013 7:39 pm

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by indago »

homerfobe wrote:
Vrede wrote:Faggotry: It's not just for faggots anymore.
Speaking of faggots...


User avatar
homerfobe
Ensign
Posts: 1565
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 9:37 am
Location: All over more than anywhere else.

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by homerfobe »

indago wrote:
homerfobe wrote:
Vrede wrote:Faggotry: It's not just for faggots anymore.
Speaking of faggots...

Faggot horseshit propaganda. An attempt to make it appear that fag haters are secretly fags themselves. As for the video <sniff> <sniff> So sad. :thumbdown:
Proudly Telling It Like It Is: In Your Face! Whether You Like It Or Not!

User avatar
rstrong
Captain
Posts: 5889
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:32 am
Location: Winnipeg, MB

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by rstrong »

> The majority of states now!

And even in the hold-out states it's recognized by major employers including the federal government and large corporations.

The war is won, and winding down.

User avatar
homerfobe
Ensign
Posts: 1565
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 9:37 am
Location: All over more than anywhere else.

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by homerfobe »

Vrede wrote:
I predict Sons of the Homophobes marches in 2165. People will laugh and throw fruit at them.
People will throw fags at the homophobes? :wtf: :-0?>

the gay community set up a fruit stand outside the church's Sunday services.
Appropriately named: a fruit stand. A bunch of fruits standing around. :lol:
rstrong wrote: The majority of states now! And even in the hold-out states it's recognized by major employers including the federal government and large corporations. The war is won, and winding down.
Is that a hooray for the cocksuckers?
Vrede wrote: Your video - so true, so true. Multiple scientific studies have backed it up.
So how did you get your start? Were you convinced by some queer based scientific study? Queers have to have some bullshit study in an attempt to accuse everyone else of being queer just to justify their filthy existence.
Proudly Telling It Like It Is: In Your Face! Whether You Like It Or Not!

User avatar
Wneglia
Midshipman
Posts: 1103
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 7:00 pm

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by Wneglia »

Trinity Western University (Canada) Graduates Barred from Bar

Want to bet they make an exception for gay graduates of TWU?

Why not just interview the alumni about their beliefs rather than punishing them for the school they attended? What if they graduated before the "Community Covenant" was adopted?

:mrgreen:

Mr.B
A bad person.
Posts: 4891
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by Mr.B »

Vrede wrote: "Bolivia, 14,000 feet. We are everywhere."
"We"....? Is that an admission of anything...? :lol: :lol:

Mr.B
A bad person.
Posts: 4891
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by Mr.B »

Wneglia wrote:Trinity Western University (Canada) Graduates Barred from Bar

"Want to bet they make an exception for gay graduates of TWU?"
An example of Sodom and Gomorrah being the proverbial Phoenix rising from the ashes......

User avatar
rstrong
Captain
Posts: 5889
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:32 am
Location: Winnipeg, MB

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by rstrong »

Mr.B wrote:
Wneglia wrote:Trinity Western University (Canada) Graduates Barred from Bar

"Want to bet they make an exception for gay graduates of TWU?"
An example of Sodom and Gomorrah being the proverbial Phoenix rising from the ashes......
The goal is to PREVENT a Sodom and Gomorrah being the proverbial Phoenix rising from the ashes. Religion was the justification for hatred, slavery, war and stomping on human rights for too much of history, and we've had enough of it.

Many Christians - including the largest denomination of Protestants in the country - support same-sex marriages and won't stand for this school's policies.

If you want to school your kids around your particular interpretation of your particular religion - cherry-picking your hatreds and phobias from your holy book, go ahead. No-one in Canada will stop you. If you want to micro-manage your students thoughts and opinions OUTSIDE your school - and force them to conform to your hatreds and phobias OUTSIDE the realm of their courses - as this school does - go ahead. No-one in Canada will stop you.

But when they leave your school and enter the real world, don't expect those hatreds and phobias to be accommodated. A core principle of the lawyer's oath is to uphold the rights and freedoms of all according to the law. When a law school itself not only rejects that principle but makes students sign a covenant rejecting that principle, don't expect professional societies out in the real world to declare them professionals.

User avatar
O Really
Admiral
Posts: 23582
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by O Really »

"Just 29 percent of voters rated Corbett favorably, and only 35 percent approve of his job as governor, with his cuts to education spending cited as one of the top reasons for disapproval."

Cuts to education not taken too well, eh? Ya hear that McCrory? Scott? Tillis?

User avatar
rstrong
Captain
Posts: 5889
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:32 am
Location: Winnipeg, MB

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by rstrong »

Vrede wrote:You don't mind, do you rstrong?
I don't mind. I haven't wandered that far south in 20 years.

I do however question the wisdom of giving them a state with nukes.
Vrede wrote:Is anyone boycotting your new stamp?
No, but the guy from the Halloween franchise went on a rampage.

bannination
Captain
Posts: 5653
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:58 am
Location: Hendersonville
Contact:

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by bannination »

Texas Republicans want to criminalize homosexuality.


..... negative effects of religion.... and a waste of taxpayer dollars.

User avatar
homerfobe
Ensign
Posts: 1565
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 9:37 am
Location: All over more than anywhere else.

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by homerfobe »

What's the positive effects of homosexuality? What is positive anything by being a queer? What do queers, twat twinkies, and their perverted like gain by a fag pride parade? Cop refuse to work fag pride parade In a parade celebrating one thing or the other you don't see half naked asses sticking out from leather chaps or half naked cowboys, clowns, cops or anything else that a warped, twisted, perverted nasty assed faggot can conjure up. Why should a cop be forced to work a parade featuring lowlife scum lifestyles he doesn't believe in? Does he not have any rights himself? The fags scream rights, where's his rights? They don't count? Do filthy faggots think they are the only ones entitled to rights? If I was that cop, I'd gloat in my paid leave then sue the hell out of the PD if they reprimanded me for violating my rights. Piss on them f**king queers. They don't deserve the time of day no more than any other lowlife pervert.
Proudly Telling It Like It Is: In Your Face! Whether You Like It Or Not!

Mr.B
A bad person.
Posts: 4891
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by Mr.B »

I can agree with part of Homey's post. Why are homosexuals practically naked marching in their parades? You don't see that type of behavior in any other types of parades. Imagine yourself sitting and watching the Apple Festival parade or Christmas parade where the participants are wearing next-to-nothing. How would you feel about men dressed only in penis sock thongs and feathers or sprayed-on underwear? Or women wearing pants with the crotches cut out?

Homosexuals are up in arms over equality; what does that type of public lewd exhibitionism have to do with equality...or how does it help their cause?

The policeman simply didn't want to march with those who dressed (undressed) like that.

I don't blame him; I would taken the suspension too....that's not about tolerance; it's about common decency.

Mr.B
A bad person.
Posts: 4891
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by Mr.B »

Vrede wrote: "On planet "Mr. B. homerfobe" Catholics could refuse to serve Methodists, blacks could refuse to serve whites, Muslims could refuse to serve women, pacifists and fiscal conservatives could refuse to serve veterans and soldiers, cons could refuse to serve Hispanics, even citizens, and I could blithely let bigots die. Yuck."
Aren't you rather confused? I'm not speaking of racism or discrimination, I spoke of tolerance toward homosexuals and common decency on their part.

"Remember, your "team" wears white hoods, includes Tammy Faye Bakker, dons nazi uniforms, dresses Tea Party goofy, or threatens violence by marching armed."
My team? Guilt by association, maybe? I've never associated myself with the KKK, religious charlatans, or any other off-the-wall group that called themselves or associates their actions with Christianity.

"Bigot" and "homophobe" seem to be the gist of your vocabulary; a label you slap on anyone who opposes homosexuality regardless of why they oppose it, whether it be outright hate or religious belief. There's quite a difference in hate and religious belief, but your "team" can't or won't see through that, and that attitude can only fuel hatred towards homosexuals.

User avatar
O Really
Admiral
Posts: 23582
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm

Re: The homophobic thread :>

Unread post by O Really »

What percentage of the gay population do you suppose dresses (or undresses) strangely and marches in the parade? Yet it seems somehow reasonable to paint everyone with the same mascara? And do we accuse other parading groups as being representative of those not involved? All Philadelphians are mummers? Ever been to Mardi Gras or practically any other parade in New Orleans? There's some strange costumes (many with little or no clothing) on a lot of ostensibly straight people. Such costumes would indeed be inappropriate at an Apple Festival or Christmas parade, but then Mardi Gras, Gay Pride, Anti-Abortion aren't intended to be Christmas parades, are they?

Post Reply