The homophobic thread :>

[Mr.B]

"Are you now claiming that you didn't screw up whether he was a member of that church and that you weren't mocking the bereaved, Mr.B Phelps?"

......... Now Open for Drive-Thru Service

I wasn't "mocking" the "bereaved"..... I thought it funny what he said. Problem with that, Miss Manners? That's as funny as people who get on these Judge So-and-So shows and try to impress the judge with their knowledge of three dollar words; i.e., "the perpetrator, the perp, etc.

As far as his being a member, so it was; they probably didn't know he was a closet "gay" until it was published in the obit.

[Mr.B]

"How did you get so broken?"

Spending too much money.

[bannination]

100 pages, congrats bannination!

Not far behind O Really's Gun Legislation and just ahead of Wneglia's Big Brother is Watching You and then your own The Religion Thread.

Guns, gays, goons and gods - How American of us.

Woot! I feel like I should give myself a prize.

.... and now I wait on Mr. B's sarcastic comment.

[Mr.B]

mock

1. to attack or treat with ridicule, contempt, or derision.
2. to ridicule by mimicry of action or speech; mimic derisively.
6. to use ridicule or derision; scoff; jeer
7. a contemptuous or derisive imitative action or speech; mockery or derision.

I wasn't "mocking" the "bereaved".....

Of course you were mocking the bereaved. It's both funny and pitiful when you lie about your own words when busted. You do it a lot.

"...because his 'constituents' complained"....

...he <actually> said "con-tish-u-ents"

How did you get so broken?

Ditto when you run away when your lie is exposed.

"Forbidden
Access to this resource on the server is denied!"
You screwed up your diversionary and no doubt whiny image.

Thank you for finally admitting that you didn't <actually> understand the video you watched after trying to give me grief for not understanding a video I didn't watch.

.....Serving Crybabies...our specialty (waahhh!)

[Mr.B]

"Woot! I feel like I should give myself a prize..... and now I wait on Mr. B's sarcastic comment.

You got your prize....one you really didn't expect to receive.....Vrede! (now that wasn't sarcastic; unless you have Vrede's mindset)

[Mr.B]

"I'm laughing, it's what I expect from a homophobe."

I'm laughing too... 0:-?> ...it's what I expect from a whiny atheist liberal. Carry on, your humorous barbs are overwhelming.

It's a good thing Banni keeps you around for the comic relief. Clowns are good stress relievers.

[Mr.B]

"Shun responsibility all you want by calling me names, none of them are so despicable as mocking the bereaved, lying about your own words when busted and running away when your lie is exposed."

Awwww...now, now. <sniff>

About as despicable as your referring to God as a bigot... To you, everyone who ignores your rants is either lying or running away.

Your worn-out whines are something we're used to hearing; but then again, it's your nature...you've got the can't-help-it disease.

[neoplacebo]

I often write letters to dead people I see in the obituary listings just to see if the letter comes back to me or if someone in that particular family is committing mail fraud. The results so far are about fifty fifty....

[Mr.B]

"your crybaby obsession with me is so overwhelming and desperate....."

Hey pot...meet kettle. Own it.

Mocking..ha! I mentioned one word of the guy's statement; get over it, you'll contract hives.

[Mr.B]

"Lie again, one you got called on last night."

Yeah...and you speak the truth, the whole truth, and anything but the truth...I know it's hard to be humble when you're great as you are.

[Mr.B]

"Plus, as you know I don't believe in God so it's stupid and whiny, as usual, to say that I called Her/Him anything. Rather, I'm saying that you've chosen to worship a bigoted God in order to rationalize your own bigotry."

Now you're lying. Inasmuch as I, (or other Bible-believing Christians) will not compromise my religious beliefs merely to satisfy your obscene and radical support for homosexuals, you call "the God" I worship a "bigoted God". Since you know I believe in one God; the God of Creation, that is in effect, calling God a bigot no matter how you attempt to sugar-coat your vile, blasphemous words.

The fact that you and others don't believe in God is the underlying reason you really support the homosexual agenda only because the Bible that Christianity and other Bible-believing faiths believes in and follows specifically, condemns it as an abomination.

You can spew your rights and tolerance agenda all you wish; God gave you a choice to make, and you've made yours.

I believe that humans are created equally and should be treated equally, but to endorse or support sinful lusts, whether it be homosexuality, adultery, polygamy, or any other deviation that 'the world' says is OK is not going to happen from me or anyone else who believes the Bible to be the Word of God.
You can scream about "churches" supporting homosexuals in the 'name of love and tolerance' all you want, sin is sin, no matter which "religion" supports it..

Call me all the names you wish...sticks and stones and all that.

[Mr.B]

"Can you continue indefinitely the dishonest denials and failure to admit that mocking the bereaved is wrong without just running away from it?"

Boy howdy! Ridiculing that one word really got your step-ins in a wad, didn't it? Can you continue indefinitely whining about that?

If the guy had not have been a homosexual, (or Black, possibly) you wouldn't have given my comment a second thought.

Crocodile tears and all that other stuff.

[bannination]

"Plus, as you know I don't believe in God so it's stupid and whiny, as usual, to say that I called Her/Him anything. Rather, I'm saying that you've chosen to worship a bigoted God in order to rationalize your own bigotry."

Now you're lying. Inasmuch as I, (or other Bible-believing Christians) will not compromise my religious beliefs merely to satisfy your obscene and radical support for homosexuals, you call "the God" I worship a "bigoted God". Since you know I believe in one God; the God of Creation, that is in effect, calling God a bigot no matter how you attempt to sugar-coat your vile, blasphemous words.

The fact that you and others don't believe in God is the underlying reason you really support the homosexual agenda only because the Bible that Christianity and other Bible-believing faiths believes in and follows specifically, condemns it as an abomination.

You can spew your rights and tolerance agenda all you wish; God gave you a choice to make, and you've made yours.

I believe that humans are created equally and should be treated equally, but to endorse or support sinful lusts, whether it be homosexuality, adultery, polygamy, or any other deviation that 'the world' says is OK is not going to happen from me or anyone else who believes the Bible to be the Word of God.
You can scream about "churches" supporting homosexuals in the 'name of love and tolerance' all you want, sin is sin, no matter which "religion" supports it..

Call me all the names you wish...sticks and stones and all that.

Is interracial marriage still a sin in your world to Mr. B? Just curious, I'm still trying to build a profile of the "true Christian" (tm).

[Mr.B]

"Is interracial marriage still a sin in your world to Mr. B? Just curious, I'm still trying to build a profile of the "true Christian" (tm).

I don't recall ever saying or reading anywhere that it was.


Copy and paste these.....it looks better: TM ®

Shrink it down to size 50.

[bannination]

"Is interracial marriage still a sin in your world to Mr. B? Just curious, I'm still trying to build a profile of the "true Christian" (tm).

I don't recall ever saying or reading anywhere that it was.

... and that's exactly what the majority of Christians will be saying about gay marriage in 30 years.

This is strange though, Christians of a 100 years ago would think you're not a "true Christian" for thinking interracial marriage is ok, and Christians 30 years from now will think you're not a "true Christian" because you thought homosexual marriage was a sin.

........and you wonder why people have a problem with this.....?????

Every generation thinks they are the "true Christian" and yet, every generation's beliefs are incompatible with the last.

[Mr.B]

"If different faiths define sin differently then sin is not sin."

You're not making sense.....
It was God, in whom "faiths" are based that defined sin, not the churches, not the denominations, and not the religions. Any church can stand up and say ''our 'theology' is the correct one, yours isn't."

Again, sin is sin, no matter who, how or what sugar-coats it.

"First, you know that their (sic) are tolerant and loving churches."
Uh-huh...many of them have homosexual "pastors" too. Because they are "tolerant and loving" to homosexuals doesn't mean that God has come along and changed His mind about what He told Moses to write; man is attempting to change God and the Bible....won't happen.

"Just because yours is discriminatory and hateful doesn't give you the right to speak for all Christians."
I'm not speaking for all Christians. Anyone who believes that homosexuality is OK by God's Word is not a Christian anyway.
So what part of "anyone else who believes the Bible to be the Word of God" are you having trouble in comprehending?


"Then, you know that I have often applauded the tolerant and loving churches."
Sure you have; you along with everyone else who hates God and His Word. Churches can be "tolerant and loving churches" towards homosexuality all they want, they can scream it in the streets, post it on flyers, or go knocking door to door. No "church" doctrine or public proclamation is going to change the Word of God; "man shall not lie with man as he lies with a woman" (or vice-versa).....oops! I forgot...."you said because the Bible says so doesn't cut it"....silly me; how would I dare contradict you?

[O Really]

Mr.B may very well have never said nor read that many in the Christian faith believe(d) inter-racial marriage to be a sin. But it's pretty easy to find something to read about it. Here's a scholarly discussion of the issue:

http://faithandheritage.com/2011/05/the ... egenation/

Turns out, one has to be creative in, ummmm, "interpretation" to find inter-racial marriage prohibited in the Bible, but find it they did. Sort of..

"Paul referred to the broader meaning of these laws against hybridization, and against yoking an ox and an ass to a plow (Deut. 22:10), in II Corinthians 6:14. . . . Unequal yoking plainly means mixed marriages between believers and unbelievers and is clearly forbidden. But Deuteronomy 22:10 not only forbids unequal religious yoking by inference, and as a case law, but also unequal yoking generally. This means that an unequal marriage between believers or between unbelievers is wrong. Man was created in the image of God (Gen. 1:26), and woman in the reflected image of God in man, and from man (I Cor. 11:1-12; Gen. 2:18, 21-23). “Helpmeet” means a reflection or mirror, an image of man, indicating that a woman must have something religiously and culturally in common with her husband. The burden of the law is thus against inter-religious, inter-racial, and inter-cultural marriages, in that they normally go against the very community which marriage is designed to establish."

[Mr.B]

"Is interracial marriage still a sin in your world to Mr. B? Just curious, I'm still trying to build a profile of the "true Christian" (tm).

I don't recall ever saying or reading anywhere that it was.

... and that's exactly what the majority of Christians will be saying about gay marriage in 30 years.
This is strange though, Christians of a 100 years ago would think you're not a "true Christian" for thinking interracial marriage is ok, and Christians 30 years from now will think you're not a "true Christian" because you thought homosexual marriage was a sin.
...and in 30 years God's Word will still say the same it says today. "Just because someone calls themselves a Christian........"
........and you wonder why people have a problem with this.....?????
I have no problem with it. Sin is sin; not hard to recognize.

Every generation thinks they are the "true Christian" and yet, every generation's beliefs are incompatible with the last.
Yes, you and Vrede have pointed out many times what a "Christian" is, and many times I've given you the differences. (see above)

[Mr.B]

"...against yoking an ox and an ass to a plow"

Speaking of "yoking an ox and an ass together"......just think :-0?> ....Vrede and Bannination......

(it's up to you to figure out which is which!)

[O Really]

If "sin is sin; not hard to recognize," it seems there wouldn't have been all the discussion and disagreement over the centuries as to what constitutes "sin." I'm pretty sure we could all come up with examples of man-made "sins" held to be such with all the fervor of the true believer. Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't some protestant denominations consider dancing to be sinful? Find that in the Bible, eh?