The real cost of ignorance: finally found!

Generally an unmoderated forum for discussion of pretty much any topic. The focus however, is usually politics.
User avatar
O Really
Admiral
Posts: 23651
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm

Re: The real cost of ignorance: finally found!

Unread post by O Really »

Vrede wrote:Do geniuses dress like that and shop at Walmart?

...

This whole chat is silly and kinda sexist, it's just personal taste.
You're right, but the only reason I keep on with it is that I still think you're looking at Palin through ideological lenses. Let's try this. We know Tina Fey to be very bright and, as far as I know, is not mean-spirited, yada. She did a great impersonation of Palin and, by all accounts, had the look down pat.
https://www.google.com/search?q=tina+fe ... 84&imgdii=_

So the question is, do you find Tina Fey attractive?

Mr.B
A bad person.
Posts: 4891
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm

Re: The real cost of ignorance: finally found!

Unread post by Mr.B »

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I personally don't find Sarah or Tina unattractive in the looks department. Since I'm not acquainted with their individual personalities, I can't speak for that type of attractiveness....meaning good looks isn't all there is to being attractive.

User avatar
neoplacebo
Admiral of the Fleet
Posts: 12708
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 1:42 pm
Location: Kingsport TN

Re: The real cost of ignorance: finally found!

Unread post by neoplacebo »

I find Katy Perry attractive, but she could be dumber than dirt for all I know. "Attractive" is a subjective term; lots of folks are "attracted" to things that others find repulsive. I find Tim Moffitt repulsive, not attractive. Hell, I consider that dumbass radioacative, scary crazy, and foul in all manner. As for Tina, I don't find her any more or less "attractive" in real life or in satire.....I give her the same mark for appearance as Sarah, plus a 10 for the impersonation. What's really attractive are magnets.

User avatar
O Really
Admiral
Posts: 23651
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm

Re: The real cost of ignorance: finally found!

Unread post by O Really »

More fun with an "unfiltered" Sarah.... http://wallstcheatsheet.com/politics/5- ... all&ref=OB

bannination
Captain
Posts: 5656
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:58 am
Location: Hendersonville
Contact:

Re: The real cost of ignorance: finally found!

Unread post by bannination »

O Really wrote:More fun with an "unfiltered" Sarah.... http://wallstcheatsheet.com/politics/5- ... all&ref=OB
FTA, and Sarah's mouth:
. “Go back to what our founders and our founding documents meant — they’re quite clear — that we would create law based on the God of the Bible and the Ten Commandments,” said Palin.
Yep, she has clearly never read them.

User avatar
O Really
Admiral
Posts: 23651
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm

Re: The real cost of ignorance: finally found!

Unread post by O Really »

Go Sarah! Go Sarah!
Palin compares "junk science" climate change to eugenics. ...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/10/2 ... lp00000592

User avatar
rstrong
Captain
Posts: 5889
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:32 am
Location: Winnipeg, MB

Re: The real cost of ignorance: finally found!

Unread post by rstrong »

Glad to see that climate deniers finally found a spokesperson who they can identify with on an intellectual level.

Post Reply