Michael Brown was nothing more than a low-life street punk. In the robbery video, you can see his hand around the neck of the store owner as he walked out with the cigars in his hand. His size and strength was his weapon; a "Bad, Bad, Leroy Brown" wannabe. Despite the fact that he strong-arm robbed the store prior to his demise was not in any way considered when the riots started. In fact the news media changed his name....all you heard was "Unarmed Black Teenager Michael Brown".indago wrote: "So many lies by "witnesses", little wonder, then, the decision was to not prosecute Wilson."
I can't but wonder at the sensibility behind the city not showing the evidence that was presented to the grand jury before announcing the verdict against Wilson.
Instead, they announced the verdict, then proceeded to show the evidence...after the violence flared up again.
Did you see the interview with George Stephanopoulos? I believe 'ol George believed Wilson after that, but Robin Roberts was rather miffed; you could see it in her attitude. After seeing the interview, I couldn't see how the grand jury could indict him although I didn't believe Wilson's story at first.O Really wrote:"I'm shocked! Shocked I say. Who would have thought they'd have turned Wilson loose?"