perspctv wrote:It is interesting to see how many righties want to forget their former personas.
I agree with them.
They should be embarrassed.
Sort of how the Republican Party left the entire previous Republican administration uninvited to their convention, has been careful not to mention them for the entire election campaign, and gets offended when someone else mentions them. It reminds me of the people edited out of Soviet and Chinese photos, paintings, tapestries and records.
Winston Smith survived and now works for the Republican Ministry of Truth.
It's kind of like Lance Armstrong's vacated titles. There was no president from 2001 to 2009.
And if there was, he's certainly not responsible for anything that happened on his watch or the aftermath of anything he put into motion.
And if you mention the name "Bush," then you're "blaming Bush" even if you're only pointing out a historical fact.
Ah, the ever elusive and much maligned Vrede ... we finally get to meet.
Though, to be honest, you were accused as being everyone ... including me.
Truly an honor ... thanks!
For those who did not participate on the BRN forum, you can see the newly arrived Mike is being welcomed by the left leaning, liberal, wing nuts that live in a fantasy world. Big on insults, small on substance. Mike fits right in.
Back to you Verd. "And if you mention the name "Bush," then you're "blaming Bush" even if you're only pointing out a historical fact"......and ....if you mention Clinton, Slick Willie that is, or the Peanut Farmer from Plains, you're not pointing out historical facts either now are you?. Libs, chameleons with such short memories.
perspctv wrote:It is interesting to see how many righties want to forget their former personas.
I agree with them.
They should be embarrassed.
The funny thing here is the libs making fun of names and who has what. Yet you fail to mention that JUST TWO of your liberal buds had MORE ALIASES then there were con posters on the BRN forums.
Irony!
Colonel Taylor wrote:
The funny thing here is the libs making fun of names and who has what. Yet you fail to mention that JUST TWO of your liberal buds had MORE ALIASES then there were con posters on the BRN forums.
Irony!
perspctv wrote:It is interesting to see how many righties want to forget their former personas.
I agree with them.
They should be embarrassed.
Sort of how the Republican Party left the entire previous Republican administration uninvited to their convention, has been careful not to mention them for the entire election campaign, and gets offended when someone else mentions them. It reminds me of the people edited out of Soviet and Chinese photos, paintings, tapestries and records.
Dan Senor (former "blame Bush" neocon Iraq hawk) survived as well and serves as some kind of Ubergruppenfuhrer in the Romney camp.
John Sununu also survived and serves as Minister of Propaganda and Spin Doctor.
Last edited by neoplacebo on Fri Oct 26, 2012 8:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
Colonel Taylor wrote:
The funny thing here is the libs making fun of names and who has what. Yet you fail to mention that JUST TWO of your liberal buds had MORE ALIASES then there were con posters on the BRN forums.
Irony!
More paranoia.... everyone's Vrede, etc.
So are you in denial? Vrede and Stinger didn't have dozens of different forum names? Never thought banni would outright lie to protect his liberal friends.
Don't you remember the reason for that? I do; it's because they kept getting booted when you and others unable to take the shame of being wrong and stupid would complain to the wet nurse. Nothing to deny about it, sport.
neoplacebo wrote:Don't you remember the reason for that? I do; it's because they kept getting booted when you and others unable to take the shame of being wrong and stupid would complain to the wet nurse. Nothing to deny about it, sport.
Umm I never reported anyone, just keep making things up why don't ya. Although a few libs reported me I even told names and why! So quickly you forget. At one time if you asked they told ya.
So you also deny they had more forum names then con posters? Have to love lib logic, break the rules, get slammed, cheating is OK!
PBO, I spent 4 weeks in time out in the old forum. I'm confident the cons didn't whine to the wet nurse and at least one of the libs, in a PM, denied they didn't do it. Not sure about the others but I doubt the action taken against me was the result of a complaint. I ask but got a canned answer from the M/A that was mostly excerpts from the forum rules.
My supposition is con complaints to the "wet nurse" was not the culprit in the demise of the BRN forum. Others on here have their own suppositions. No one really knows.
Reality wrote:PBO, I spent 4 weeks in time out in the old forum. I'm confident the cons didn't whine to the wet nurse and at least one of the libs, in a PM, denied they didn't do it. Not sure about the others but I doubt the action taken against me was the result of a complaint. I ask but got a canned answer from the M/A that was mostly excerpts from the forum rules.
My supposition is con complaints to the "wet nurse" was not the culprit in the demise of the BRN forum. Others on here have their own suppositions. No one really knows.
Yup I was branded and given a time out also and took it never coming back with aliases, must be a liberal thing, rules and taxes are for the others not them mentality. And at least once I was reported by a sniveling liberal who threatened to go to the law. What a group of wusses.