Mr.B wrote:Yeah, I can't send or receive PM's.
I deleted them myself by accident. I discovered if I delete them before they're read, they don't get read!
I honestly believe now though, that Banni can't fool with PM's.
You wouldn't let a subject go until the other wearied of being hounded on and on and the other gave you satisfaction by admitting an "opps". Failure of the other to submit to your harassment, whether they were right or wrong, got them branded a "coward" or any other new word/phrase of the month you happened to stumble upon.Vrede too wrote:Mr.B wrote:Banni has restored most phpBB codes except for my ability to send or receive PMs, or hide my presence as being logged in. I believe the reason for that is because Vrede is in a blind panic that I will reveal his identity via PM to any one of the "con wingnuts" that he so vehemently trashed over the years. If that is true, that's absolutely silly, because I could have done that long before any of this surfaced; either by PM or email.
I have not asked banni to do anything re your PMing,
I didn't say you did.
am well aware that stopping your PMs would not stop your sleaze, have said several times that you already posted enough that the non-slow,
non-lazy con wingnuts could figure it out without any further help from you,
If they had, don't you think they'd be gloating over it?
have told you several times that they can't do me any harm since my posts are gone,
Personally, I don't think it's your posts they're interested in.
would bet my home that you have already discussed my real life ID with others
One other...none you would be afraid of knowing who you are. There are still some decent people here but you are too
self-absorbed to realize it.
and, not having been privvy to the PMs between you and banni, have no opinion as to what banni's done other than mild amusement that it irks you.
Ain't bothered me that much; just a minor setback.
My points are proved, again[color=#BF0000]Vrede too[/color] wrote:[color=#004080]Mr.B[/color] wrote:... No one 'thought' something, they were 'delusional',
Only when they were delusional, see above.
or 'fantasizing',
That was always your fantasizing things about me, see above.
bring up the subject again, you were 'obsessing'.
95% of your posts here for the past year or more have been obsessing about gays, me and God, pretty much in that order. Other than your gay obsessed buddy homefobe, everyone else has broader interests.
... My even typing this will be labeled as 'whining'.
7 pages of it so far. More whining ignored.
So....do I get my status back? I think I've proved by now that, despite the underhandedness of my actions, I'm no sleazier than the one who is at the center of this controversy. At least now, I have some degree of satisfaction. My ♠ in the hole and all that....bannination wrote:Yep, I'm not a liar. Congratulations. Even offered to give Colonel Taylor a tour of administrative functions, of course he doesn't want to, he's just bitching and knows there is no substance.Mr.B wrote:Yeah, I can't send or receive PM's.
I deleted them myself by accident. I discovered if I delete them before they're read, they don't get read!
I honestly believe now though, that Banni can't fool with PM's.
homerfobe wrote:... I'm Black, black as the ace of spades ...
Nttawwt, but maybe you two should keep some things private.Mr.B wrote:... My ♠ in the hole ...
Vrede too wrote:homerfobe wrote:... I'm Black, black as the ace of spades ...Nttawwt, but maybe you two should keep some things private.Mr.B wrote:... My ♠ in the hole ...
Good one! However...not related. ☻
Re: The Whining ThreadVrede wrote: "You've already got a ton of unanswered posts on the General Discussion topics page. Did you notice?"
Hadn't noticed until you mentioned it, so I went back to see what I posted in each thread. There was nothing especially posted, except in the Religion thread, that would warrant a reply. Unlike you, the others don't deem it absolutely necessary to reply to every post in order to debunk it or run the poster into the ground by picking it apart. If you remember, and I'm sure you do; it used to be that practically every thread had your name as the last poster; something about that "having to have the last word" comes to mind.
"I wouldn't know, I'm not a mind reader. What do you think they're interested in?"
You're not an idiot either...(in that sense, that is.)
".....how you'll whine for 8+ pages....."
You mean when I'm replying to your 8+ pages of whining...? Do tell.
"There are two cons that have condemned you privately and one that's debunked you publicly."
So...when do I start crying? Anyone at all can say what they please here; this is an open forum, remember? Why would any "con" slink around and condemn me "privately", in a PM I'm assuming, to you? Until proven, I callon that one.
Wneglia did not "debunk me"; he said, in essence, even though his name has been brought up, he wanted no part of this affray. He did say he wasn't offended by your posting his photo; that's big of him; small of you to do it anyway without asking first. Also, he said he took offense in the filth and vulgarity in the blasphemous and sacrilegious photos and "cartoons" that you loons were posting.
GoCubsGo wrote:"Does this make Mr. B an ace-hole?" :angel4:
Nah....different spelling.
Wneglia wrote:... I cannot fault Vrede, as it was not only done without malice, and was my fault for being stupid enough to use my real name when initially registering in the original Blue Ridge forum. This is the first non-professional forum I have participated in, and had I known the potential hazards of non-anonymitiy, I would never have done it, but once it was done, anyone could google my name and get pages of hits....
Vrede too wrote:... I am not offering an opinion on what if any sanctions should be imposed on Mr.B. That would be too self-serving. The physical threat months ago was funny to me and I urged that there be no penalty then, but now that it's become a pattern of behavior the situation is different.
Feel free to weigh in to help banni decide. Any conclusion is fine with me and maybe _____'s way is best - Isn't shunning an appropriately Christian thing? If the decision is nothing, I'm fine with that. I can hold my own for as long as I feel like and y'all are creative enough to hold him accountable one way or the other....
Lying POS....You were not "outed". Unlike you Mr. B has more integrity than to "out" you. Now, you may have been FOUND out but I know nothing more of you today than the first day you opened your condescending maw against one of my opinions. So continue in your pity party. However, do not offer up a challenge that you lack the guts to participate in yourself coward. It proves you as the hypocrite we all know you are!Vrede too wrote: Ummm, I was already outed, idiot. That's the whole point of this thread. You're the one saying that it's hiding to remove my post history, yet you don't have the balls to leave your post history while outing yourself.
It's obvious you're enjoying the wallowing in your own pity party and playing the part of the poor victim, but you're not garnering any more sympathy (or pity) from your peers, who, in case you haven't noticed, are not posting any comments on your behalf to your ongoing rants, ravings, and slobbering shrieks. You have nothing more to prove, so the constant re-hashing and re-quoting from you is nothing but hilarious entertainment; you know, like that "professional wrasslin' " thingy...?Vrede too wrote:"It's blasphemous to claim that you are an agent of God in citing biblical justification for your prying, escalation of disagreement and sleazy behavior.""Vrede reaps what he sows."
Maybe you like this better?
"Nor did you ever think your *attitude towards others would one day jump up and bite you in the ass?"
*which includes your own sleazy behavior.