:?:JTA wrote:/s
For the record just in case
Race, lets make this serious! It is nearly 2013.
- Vrede too
- Superstar Cultmaster
- Posts: 57242
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:46 am
- Location: Hendersonville, NC
Re: Race, lets make this serious! It is nearly 2013.
F' ELON
and the
FELON
1312. ETTD
and the
FELON
1312. ETTD
- O Really
- Admiral
- Posts: 23160
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm
Re: Race, lets make this serious! It is nearly 2013.
"Black" has always been subjective. As has "native American." Back in the day, only a little bit of "black" blood was necessary to be classified officially and socially as a "negro." It has never been necessary that both or either of ones parents actually be black to be called black. Not that I'm defending that, but really, we're mostly all mongrels. Why can't you identify socially and culturally as well as physiologically? And though it varies from tribe to tribe, generally one only has to be able to show direct descendace from somebody originally on tribal rolls to apply for tribal membership. If you look at a lot of people officially in a tribe, you'd never guess...but as long as their triple-great grandma or somebody was a real Indian, they're in.
Which brings up another interesting conundrum. Take Obama fr'intstance. One white parent, one black. Why is he black? Why is anyone with a black ancestor or parent black? Beyonce? All the beautiful women on "Bones?" I say let her be whatever she feels like.
Which brings up another interesting conundrum. Take Obama fr'intstance. One white parent, one black. Why is he black? Why is anyone with a black ancestor or parent black? Beyonce? All the beautiful women on "Bones?" I say let her be whatever she feels like.
-
- A bad person.
- Posts: 4891
- Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm
Re: Race, lets make this serious! It is nearly 2013.
That's illegal in all 50 states.JTA wrote:"Rain makes corn, corn makes whisky, whisky makes me and my horse start feeling a bit frisky."

-
- Commander
- Posts: 3898
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 4:04 pm
Re: Race, lets make this serious! It is nearly 2013.
What I wrote was sarcasm, I wasn't sure if it was evident. I didn't want to seem like a douche.Vrede too wrote::?:JTA wrote:/s
For the record just in case
You aren't doing it wrong if no one knows what you are doing.
- Vrede too
- Superstar Cultmaster
- Posts: 57242
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:46 am
- Location: Hendersonville, NC
Re: Race, lets make this serious! It is nearly 2013.
I'm not sure it's sarcasm
, and don't think it's douchey.

F' ELON
and the
FELON
1312. ETTD
and the
FELON
1312. ETTD
-
- A bad person.
- Posts: 4891
- Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm
- Colonel Taylor
- Marshal
- Posts: 994
- Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 8:51 pm
-
- Commander
- Posts: 3898
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 4:04 pm
Re: Race, lets make this serious! It is nearly 2013.
Come on man this is the year 2000 not 1953. Those terms aren't acceptable anymore,Colonel Taylor wrote:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
*Native-American and African-American.
You aren't doing it wrong if no one knows what you are doing.
-
- A bad person.
- Posts: 4891
- Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm
Re: Race, lets make this serious! It is nearly 2013.
I can go along with the "Native-American" label, but not "African-American". If someone is born in the US, they are "American", regardless of their color or birth lineage. (even 'ol rstrong up in Canada is an American)
For instance, I'm of Irish, German, and Scotch lineage, but I'm not referred to as "Irish-German-Scotch American". This is the silliest thing I've ever heard of.
A few years back when this politically-correct "African-American" label came into popularity, I was in this Black lady's house doing my job, when Darcell Grimes (WLOS) said something about "African-Americans" on TV. This lady went into a tizzy.
Quote: "I ain't no damn 'Affgan-Uhmurcan', I am a Negro that's called a Black woman. I wutten born in Affgah, my Mama and Daddy wutten born in Affgah; we was all born here in North Cahlina, in the sovren nation of the United States of Uhmerca; I am a damn Uhmercan!" "They can take that "Affgan-Uhmercan" sh*t and shove it up their a*ses!"
Good point .... I've been in agreement ever since.

For instance, I'm of Irish, German, and Scotch lineage, but I'm not referred to as "Irish-German-Scotch American". This is the silliest thing I've ever heard of.
A few years back when this politically-correct "African-American" label came into popularity, I was in this Black lady's house doing my job, when Darcell Grimes (WLOS) said something about "African-Americans" on TV. This lady went into a tizzy.
Quote: "I ain't no damn 'Affgan-Uhmurcan', I am a Negro that's called a Black woman. I wutten born in Affgah, my Mama and Daddy wutten born in Affgah; we was all born here in North Cahlina, in the sovren nation of the United States of Uhmerca; I am a damn Uhmercan!" "They can take that "Affgan-Uhmercan" sh*t and shove it up their a*ses!"
Good point .... I've been in agreement ever since.


- rstrong
- Captain
- Posts: 5889
- Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:32 am
- Location: Winnipeg, MB
Re: Race, lets make this serious! It is nearly 2013.
I go with "black." "African-Canadian" seems insulting as it implies being only partially Canadian. Few would want to be called "European-Canadian." Race and nationality are two different things.
The flip-side of this is that I don't "Native-Canadian" for aboriginal North Americans. It's insulting to the rest of us, as it implies that we're not native Canadian. I was born and raised in Canada, to Canadian parents and grandparents. I'm 100% native Canadian.
But 275 years later some pretentious revolutionaries called their new country the "united States of America." They even created a "Continental Congress" expecting that the entire continent would rush to join. When that failed they used their "Continental Army" to invade Canada in 1775. That failed too, as did their invasion in 1812.
Canadians generally accept that "American" means "someone from the US." Imagine if a while back in what was already called Europe, one country renamed itself "The United States of Europe" or more commonly, "Europe." And started calling themselves "Europeans" as a nationality. And created a "Continental Congress" claiming to represent the entire continent. And then invaded the other countries with their "Continental Army" when they failed to join.
People in Europe would today would avoid calling themselves Europeans too.
The flip-side of this is that I don't "Native-Canadian" for aboriginal North Americans. It's insulting to the rest of us, as it implies that we're not native Canadian. I was born and raised in Canada, to Canadian parents and grandparents. I'm 100% native Canadian.
The earliest known use of "America" for the New World was in 1507, referring to what is now known as South America.Mr.B wrote:(even 'ol rstrong up in Canada is an American)
But 275 years later some pretentious revolutionaries called their new country the "united States of America." They even created a "Continental Congress" expecting that the entire continent would rush to join. When that failed they used their "Continental Army" to invade Canada in 1775. That failed too, as did their invasion in 1812.
Canadians generally accept that "American" means "someone from the US." Imagine if a while back in what was already called Europe, one country renamed itself "The United States of Europe" or more commonly, "Europe." And started calling themselves "Europeans" as a nationality. And created a "Continental Congress" claiming to represent the entire continent. And then invaded the other countries with their "Continental Army" when they failed to join.
People in Europe would today would avoid calling themselves Europeans too.
-
- Commander
- Posts: 3898
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 4:04 pm
Re: Race, lets make this serious! It is nearly 2013.
Yeah I don't use the term African American either. I don't know of any black people that use it either. I think it's mostly used on TV and in college campuses in classes where students/teachers awkwardly use the term African American because they're unsure whether or not it's still PC to use the term "black".rstrong wrote:I go with "black." "African-Canadian" seems insulting as it implies being only partially Canadian. Few would want to be called "European-Canadian." Race and nationality are two different things.
The flip-side of this is that I don't "Native-Canadian" for aboriginal North Americans. It's insulting to the rest of us, as it implies that we're not native Canadian. I was born and raised in Canada, to Canadian parents and grandparents. I'm 100% native Canadian.
The earliest known use of "America" for the New World was in 1507, referring to what is now known as South America.Mr.B wrote:(even 'ol rstrong up in Canada is an American)
But 275 years later some pretentious revolutionaries called their new country the "united States of America." They even created a "Continental Congress" expecting that the entire continent would rush to join. When that failed they used their "Continental Army" to invade Canada in 1775. That failed too, as did their invasion in 1812.
Canadians generally accept that "American" means "someone from the US." Imagine if a while back in what was already called Europe, one country renamed itself "The United States of Europe" or more commonly, "Europe." And started calling themselves "Europeans" as a nationality. And created a "Continental Congress" claiming to represent the entire continent. And then invaded the other countries with their "Continental Army" when they failed to join.
People in Europe would today would avoid calling themselves Europeans too.
You aren't doing it wrong if no one knows what you are doing.
- Colonel Taylor
- Marshal
- Posts: 994
- Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 8:51 pm
- Bungalow Bill
- Ensign
- Posts: 1340
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 8:12 pm
- Location: Downtown Mills River
Re: Race, lets make this serious! It is nearly 2013.
African-American came late to the hyphenated name game. Terms like
Irish-Americans and Italian-Americans were already in use. Of course
there could be Swedish-Americans or Chilean-Americans, but it was
the most populous group of immigrants who had the hyphenated names.
African-American is somewhat unwieldy in everyday conversation, but
I don't see it as a big deal.
Irish-Americans and Italian-Americans were already in use. Of course
there could be Swedish-Americans or Chilean-Americans, but it was
the most populous group of immigrants who had the hyphenated names.
African-American is somewhat unwieldy in everyday conversation, but
I don't see it as a big deal.
-
- Commander
- Posts: 3898
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 4:04 pm
Re: Race, lets make this serious! It is nearly 2013.
I know some African Americans that are white. I think it's kinda cool because it goes beyond racial barriers, like that lady that was a white NAACP president, or Michael Jackson. Transcending racial boundaries by showing us anybody can be white or black or Canadian.


You aren't doing it wrong if no one knows what you are doing.
- Vrede too
- Superstar Cultmaster
- Posts: 57242
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:46 am
- Location: Hendersonville, NC
Re: Race, lets make this serious! It is nearly 2013.
You're living it, bro. It wasn't long ago that you were an Afro-American.
I'm not sure what part of the rainbow your current avatar comes from. 


Last edited by Vrede too on Mon Jun 15, 2015 6:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
F' ELON
and the
FELON
1312. ETTD
and the
FELON
1312. ETTD
- rstrong
- Captain
- Posts: 5889
- Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:32 am
- Location: Winnipeg, MB
Re: Race, lets make this serious! It is nearly 2013.
Someone can have Irish or Italian ancestry. But unless they speak with a stereotypical Irish or Italian accent or wear Irish or Italian flag shirts, no-one will refer to them as Irish-American and Italian-American. They're hyphenated-Americans typically only in the first or second generation. Or unless they choose and publicize that they're hyphenated-Americans, to demonstrate loyalty to the old country and it's sports team and beer.Bungalow Bill wrote:African-American came late to the hyphenated name game. Terms like Irish-Americans and Italian-Americans were already in use. Of course there could be Swedish-Americans or Chilean-Americans, but it was the most populous group of immigrants who had the hyphenated names. African-American is somewhat unwieldy in everyday conversation, but I don't see it as a big deal.
On the other hand someone can be black, a tenth-generation American wearing business formal, and others will automatically declare them African-American.
-
- Commander
- Posts: 3898
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 4:04 pm
Re: Race, lets make this serious! It is nearly 2013.
YessirVrede too wrote:You're living it, bro. It wasn't long ago that you were an Afro-American.I'm not sure what part of the rainbow your current avatar comes from.
You aren't doing it wrong if no one knows what you are doing.
- Vrede too
- Superstar Cultmaster
- Posts: 57242
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:46 am
- Location: Hendersonville, NC
Re: Race, lets make this serious! It is nearly 2013.
Yikes, these flashbacks are disturbing.
F' ELON
and the
FELON
1312. ETTD
and the
FELON
1312. ETTD
-
- A bad person.
- Posts: 4891
- Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm
Re: Race, lets make this serious! It is nearly 2013.

Some kinda title like "The Four-Eyed, Double-Lipped African-American that ate Cleveland" .... I think.
-
- A bad person.
- Posts: 4891
- Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm
Re: Race, lets make this serious! It is nearly 2013.
It still amazes me that many still think that Americans only live in the USA ..... If you don't believe me, tell some redneck that Mexicans are Americans or that French-speaking Canadians are Americans, etc.rstrong wrote:"The earliest known use of "America" for the New World was in 1507, referring to what is now known as South America."Mr.B wrote:(even 'ol rstrong up in Canada is an American)
(French-speaking Cajuns is a whole 'nuther matter ...)
