Why is Obama still lying about this?

Generally an unmoderated forum for discussion of pretty much any topic. The focus however, is usually politics.
Howard Gap
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 9:14 pm
Location: Deep in the woods of Hendersonville, NC

Why is Obama still lying about this?

Unread post by Howard Gap »

It seems President Obama still can't be honest about the murder of four brave Americans.............

Breaking news on Benghazi: the CIA spokesman, presumably at the direction of CIA director David Petraeus, has put out this statement: "No one at any level in the CIA told anybody not to help those in need; claims to the contrary are simply inaccurate. ”

So who in the government did tell “anybody” not to help those in need? Someone decided not to send in military assets to help those Agency operators. Would the secretary of defense make such a decision on his own? No.

It would have been a presidential decision. There was presumably a rationale for such a decision. What was it? When and why—and based on whose counsel obtained in what meetings or conversations—did President Obama decide against sending in military assets to help the Americans in need?

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/pet ... 57896.html

User avatar
Colonel Taylor
Marshal
Posts: 994
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 8:51 pm

Re: Why is Obama still lying about this?

Unread post by Colonel Taylor »

Howard Gap wrote:It seems President Obama still can't be honest about the murder of four brave Americans.............

Breaking news on Benghazi: the CIA spokesman, presumably at the direction of CIA director David Petraeus, has put out this statement: "No one at any level in the CIA told anybody not to help those in need; claims to the contrary are simply inaccurate. ”

So who in the government did tell “anybody” not to help those in need? Someone decided not to send in military assets to help those Agency operators. Would the secretary of defense make such a decision on his own? No.

It would have been a presidential decision. There was presumably a rationale for such a decision. What was it? When and why—and based on whose counsel obtained in what meetings or conversations—did President Obama decide against sending in military assets to help the Americans in need?

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/pet ... 57896.html
Because he knows no other way of life, it's second nature to him. If he told the truth his head would pop off. :-H

User avatar
Stinger
Sub-Lieutenant
Posts: 1944
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 10:18 pm

Re: Why is Obama still lying about this?

Unread post by Stinger »

I guess asking for logic and honesty from con extremists is just way too much to ask. They need their lies and illogic like green plants need sunshine.

How is not putting something in motion the same as telling someone not to do something? Where did Obama lie?

User avatar
Bungalow Bill
Ensign
Posts: 1340
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 8:12 pm
Location: Downtown Mills River

Re: Why is Obama still lying about this?

Unread post by Bungalow Bill »

Who cares? The CIA is just a government version of Murder Incorporated. Good riddance.

:---P

Supsalemgr
Marshal
Posts: 923
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 6:39 pm

Re: Why is Obama still lying about this?

Unread post by Supsalemgr »

It is good to know Bunghy is such a patriot for disliking an organization that is trying to keep us safe.

perspctv
Red Shirt
Posts: 96
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 5:55 pm

Re: Why is Obama still lying about this?

Unread post by perspctv »

Supsalemgr wrote:It is good to know Bunghy is such a patriot for disliking an organization that is trying to keep us safe.
What do you fuckwits think you are doing with President Obama?

User avatar
Bungalow Bill
Ensign
Posts: 1340
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 8:12 pm
Location: Downtown Mills River

Re: Why is Obama still lying about this?

Unread post by Bungalow Bill »

The CIA has a long history of overthrowing governments, both democratic and not, that
were no threat to the U.S. and assassination attempts against foreign leaders. They are
largely the dirty work and hit squad for U.S. imperialism. Killing CIA agents is simply the old
idea of the best defense being a good offense. No one mourns when a member of the mob
is whacked. Same thing here.


http://old.disinfo.com/archive/pages/dossier/id453/pg1/


Yep, the armchair generals know exactly what should have been done just by dint of sitting in
front of their computer screens. Hilarious.

User avatar
rstrong
Captain
Posts: 5889
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:32 am
Location: Winnipeg, MB

Re: Why is Obama still lying about this?

Unread post by rstrong »

Speaking of unsubstantiated and wingnutty anti-Obama claims:

Back in 2008/2009 the birthers used to tell me that it was only a matter of time before they were proven correct, because Obama's birth certificate had yet to be tested in court. On that and other issues, his eligibility had yet to be proven in court.

The birthers have now had their day in court - and lost - 258 times. (PDF link)

Total Actions: 175
Birthers win: 0
Birthers lose: 166
Pending: 9

Total Appellate Court
Rulings: 70+
Birthers win: 0
Birthers lose: 70+

Total Supreme Court
Rulings1: 22
Birthers win: 0
Birthers lose: 22

For all those court cases, books, billboards and other claims, the birthers have yet to come up with any credible evidence whatsoever that Obama is ineligible.

User avatar
Tertius
Squadron Leader
Posts: 379
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 11:07 pm

Re: Why is Obama still lying about this?

Unread post by Tertius »

Bungalow Bill wrote:Who cares? The CIA is just a government version of Murder Incorporated. Good riddance.

:---P
The CIA reports to Obama. What the CIA does and does not do is up to Obama.

User avatar
Stinger
Sub-Lieutenant
Posts: 1944
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 10:18 pm

Re: Why is Obama still lying about this?

Unread post by Stinger »

Tertius wrote:
Bungalow Bill wrote:Who cares? The CIA is just a government version of Murder Incorporated. Good riddance.

:---P
The CIA reports to Obama. What the CIA does and does not do is up to Obama.
Right. He uses Muslim mind-control methods to make every single CIA agent do his bidding.

And he uses Kenyan time-travel abilities to go back in time and force the CIA to take down countries and install puppets and kill people and stuff.

User avatar
Bungalow Bill
Ensign
Posts: 1340
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 8:12 pm
Location: Downtown Mills River

Re: Why is Obama still lying about this?

Unread post by Bungalow Bill »

Then I suppose he knows more about what the situation was than all the armchair generals
here in their computer command headquarters. :)

Supsalemgr
Marshal
Posts: 923
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 6:39 pm

Re: Why is Obama still lying about this?

Unread post by Supsalemgr »

Time will tell. Patience is a virtue and getting all the facts (uncovering the coverup) will tell us exactly the answer to famous question from Watergate. "What did the president know and when did he know it?"

Reality
Wing commander
Posts: 485
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2012 4:39 am

Re: Why is Obama still lying about this?

Unread post by Reality »

"...other cons here will unpatriotically swallow and promote anything in their desperation to exploit the brave dead for craven partisan ends. Shame."

We cons are not the ones who are lieing about who let these brave Amercians die and we are definitely not the ones who will go to the end of earth to defend the one who is lieing about what happened.

Good old Vrede, tries to exploit the right to know into a lack of patriotism. If there has been any eploitation in this fiasco it has been Obama and Hillary and that idiot that respresents us at the UN.

The Obama Administration blew another one and you cannot stand to admit the one that you have so laboriously defended made a terrible mistake. How could he disappoint you like that? Doesn't he realize who you are?

User avatar
Stinger
Sub-Lieutenant
Posts: 1944
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 10:18 pm

Re: Why is Obama still lying about this?

Unread post by Stinger »

Reality wrote:"...other cons here will unpatriotically swallow and promote anything in their desperation to exploit the brave dead for craven partisan ends. Shame."

We cons are not the ones who are lieing about who let these brave Amercians die and we are definitely not the ones who will go to the end of earth to defend the one who is lieing about what happened.

No, you're the ones who are using slain American fighting men as a political football in yet another "Shoot first. Aim later." attempt to blame Obama for something.

Frickin' unpatriotic bottom feeders is what you are.


The Obama Administration blew another one and you cannot stand to admit the one that you have so laboriously defended made a terrible mistake.

Thanks for proving my point. You're the ones who are using slain American fighting men as a political football in yet another "Shoot first. Aim later." attempt to blame Obama for something.

Frickin' unpatriotic bottom feeders.

Reality
Wing commander
Posts: 485
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2012 4:39 am

Re: Why is Obama still lying about this?

Unread post by Reality »

Didn't say you were lieing Verde. Pay attention.

I said you are defending the liar. Well, I guess if you defend a liar that makes you a liar also.

Of course O' Really would disagree. Attorneys defend liars all the time.

Reality
Wing commander
Posts: 485
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2012 4:39 am

Re: Why is Obama still lying about this?

Unread post by Reality »

Stinger/Vrede, the cojoined super patriots who's closest tie to patriotism was fondling a GI Joe doll.

Reality
Wing commander
Posts: 485
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2012 4:39 am

Re: Why is Obama still lying about this?

Unread post by Reality »

The plot thickens. Word on the street is General Ham wasn't going along with the charade (post failure lies) because he had forces ready to go and was told not to engage. Supposedly that order came from Penatta

Benghazigate: General Ham: “No Order to Protect Consulate” (VIDEO)

"Benghazigate is now a focus, but it should be remembered that there have been countless Benghazigates in Afghanistan, where US forces were denied air and artillery support while under fire. That should be the real focus of this conversation. What happened in Benghazi is what has been going on in Afghanistan for some time. It’s the outcome of the Obama Administration’s CVE and Hearts and Minds program that puts Muslim sensibilities first and American lives last."


http://frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfiel ... ate-video/

Obama to nominate Army Gen. Rodriguez to lead AFRICOM

http://www.stripes.com/news/obama-to-no ... m-1.193564

Okay Vrede et al, work on this for a while. Get back to us when you have your ducks all lined up.

User avatar
Stinger
Sub-Lieutenant
Posts: 1944
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 10:18 pm

Re: Why is Obama still lying about this?

Unread post by Stinger »

Reality wrote:Didn't say you were lieing Verde. Pay attention.

I said you are defending the liar. Well, I guess if you defend a liar that makes you a liar also.

Of course O' Really would disagree. Attorneys defend liars all the time.
Logic fail. First, you have to prove someone is lying, not just really, really, really, really believe that they did because you really, really, really, really want it to be true.

You haven't proved anything; ergo, your whole line of reasoning isn't reasoning. It's knee-jerk supposition.

SSDD.

User avatar
Stinger
Sub-Lieutenant
Posts: 1944
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 10:18 pm

Re: Why is Obama still lying about this?

Unread post by Stinger »

Reality wrote:Stinger/Vrede, the cojoined super patriots who's closest tie to patriotism was fondling a GI Joe doll.
Butt Ugly, the cowardly disgrace to the uniform, who champions insubordination, doesn't understand chain of command, uses slain Americans for political footballs, who obviously has some weird attachment to dolls, and who runs like a scared chicken from every mistake he's made in his life.

Reality
Wing commander
Posts: 485
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2012 4:39 am

Re: Why is Obama still lying about this?

Unread post by Reality »

Stinger, if you are not Vrede why do you always post when she does and why are you so quick to come to her defense.

But lety's get back to the Obama Benghazi cover up.

The Commander in Chief fires the General (Hamm) for not taking action to defend our embassy when the General was told not to by SECDEF who by the way, reports directly to Obama. Evidently the General wants no part of the cover up so he gets canned.

When the General retires, we will get the real story unless he's been offered a cushy job in industry to keep his mouth shut.

Post Reply