The homophobic thread :>

[Vrede too]

Point still ducked, what a wuss!

You have been defending her. You sure are a wimp when busted, poor thing.

Are you still ducking or did banni's question confuse you?

You did reply to his comment, just stupidly or as a coward. You sure are a silly little wimp when busted, poor thing.

Still.

Lie, as usual when you're floundering. She started the job in Jan. 2015, two years after the SCOTUS handwriting was on the wall....

Lie run away from, as usual.

She's being paid 80K a year to not do her job, idiot, and she's getting donations by the truckload.

And that is the underlying reason that you and the SSM supporters have your undies in a twist. She's doing better in jail than at her job!!
It doesn't take a Philadelphia lawyer to see right through your fury! Hey, if she pulling one, in any form or fashion, she isn't so dumb after all!

No one cares if bigots transfer money among themselves, you're fantasizing again. You're ducking, as usual, your stupidity in posting that there's no "PROFIT" in it for her, though.

Ummm, she's in jail and SSM will happen in the county. Get back to us when you have a clue what you're posting about.

I never said it wouldn't.
Get back to us, whoever "us" that is really interested in this banter is, when you have a clue what you're posting about.

Whoosh. One doesn't have their job while sitting in jail, and all people care about is achieving equality, not what happens to the modern equivalent of an abandoned Japanese soldier still thinking he's relevant years after the war has been lost.

[bannination]

“Everyone must submit himself to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God. Consequently, he who rebels against the authority is rebelling against what God has instituted, and those who do so will bring judgment on themselves."

-- A god.

[JTA]

“Everyone must submit himself to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God. Consequently, he who rebels against the authority is rebelling against what God has instituted, and those who do so will bring judgment on themselves."

-- A god.

God voted for Obama!?!?!?!?

Does this mean the colonists back in 17 and 76 were rebelling against God?!?!?!?!?

[O Really]

Here's what the Fox News legal panel thinks about Davis and her lawyer. (Hint: the article contains words like "wrong" "ridiculously stupid" and "stunningly obtuse")
http://www.breitbart.com/video/2015/09/ ... ly-stupid/

[Vrede too]

... I got it that you believe anyone with sincere Christian beliefs that condemn homosexuality are bigots and homophobes....

You forgot "hypocrite, "wrong", "lead to chaos, anarchy", "ridiculously stupid", "stunningly obtuse", and "she can do her job — or she can get out".

... The homosexual supporters are just as hateful and full of sh*t as are the homosexual opponents; you know, tolerance, human rights and all that.

I guess that includes Faux Noise as quoted by Liarbart, too. Your bizarre opinion is held only by a rapidly diminishing number of bigots and homophobes and their pitiful apologists like you.

At O Really's link:

2016 Breitbart Primary (online poll, pick 1st through 3rd)

Thanks for voting! Here are the preliminary results:

TRUMP 41%
CRUZ 23%
CARSON 14%
FIORINA 5%
PAUL 3%

I voted TRUMP - CARSON - CRUZ.

[O Really]

I voted TRUMP - CARSON - CRUZ.

Dude! For someone with the privacy, ummm "concerns" you have I am shocked, shocked I say that you would actually click on anything on that site.

[bannination]

The Muslim Flight Attendant Who Won’t Serve Alcohol Was Suspended

Come all Christians, this lady needs some donations as well! Seth, get your wallet out!

[Vrede too]

Dude! For someone with the privacy, ummm "concerns" you have I am shocked, shocked I say that you would actually click on anything on that site.

I lied about my name, email address & zip code. It probably gave both of us cookies.

[O Really]

[ It probably gave both of us cookies.

Yeppers. 8 cookies. One visit, and I didn't even click their stupid poll.

[bannination]

[ It probably gave both of us cookies.

Yeppers. 8 cookies. One visit, and I didn't even click their stupid poll.

Looks like they use that communist software called Linux to run their website too. A real conservative website would be using capitalist software like Microsoft.

By voting in the Breitbart Primary you are opting-in to receive direct marketing from Breitbart and third parties and agree to our Privacy Policy.

Shocked, shocked I say...

[Seth Milner]

... I got it that you believe anyone with sincere Christian beliefs that condemn homosexuality are bigots and homophobes....

You forgot "hypocrite, "wrong", "lead to chaos, anarchy", "ridiculously stupid", "stunningly obtuse", and "she can do her job — or she can get out".
Typical liberal hate points?

... The homosexual supporters are just as hateful and full of sh*t as are the homosexual opponents; you know, tolerance, human rights and all that.

I guess that includes Faux Noise as quoted by Liarbart, too.
Who are they? Someone else you spew your hatred at? I'm not familiar with them.

Your bizarre opinion is held only by a rapidly diminishing number of bigots and homophobes and their pitiful apologists like you.
You forget easily: "UNLESS explicitly stated, there is no endorsement, support, adoration, or advocacy for any subject matter."
I neither support or condone Ms. Davis' actions. You're really good at mischaracterizing other's words and thoughts; when they won't play with you, you resort to childish name-calling and accusations. You and that homerfobe guy come from the same mold; you're in many ways so much like him/her, except for the filth part; which I imagine could surface in you if given the proper circumstances.

[Seth Milner]

The Muslim Flight Attendant Who Won’t Serve Alcohol Was Suspended

Come all Christians, this lady needs some donations as well! Seth, get your wallet out!

So? She made her choice and the airline made theirs. I see your atheist ilk jumping up and down in glee. Maybe you should get your wallet out and send that website a summary pittance so they can continue their sad website. Now read my signature below and comprehend, if you can.

[JTA]

The Muslim Flight Attendant Who Won’t Serve Alcohol Was Suspended

Come all Christians, this lady needs some donations as well! Seth, get your wallet out!

Turns out my new religion requires me to not work. I just converted today, so I guess I'm gonna have to inform my boss tomorrow. If they fire me you think I should sue for discrimination?

[Seth Milner]

Turns out my new religion requires me to not work. I just converted today, so I guess I'm gonna have to inform my boss tomorrow. If they fire me you think I should sue for discrimination?

My curiosity compels me to ask: What did you turn into?

[O Really]

... I got it that you believe anyone with sincere Christian beliefs that condemn homosexuality are bigots and homophobes....

You forgot "hypocrite, "wrong", "lead to chaos, anarchy", "ridiculously stupid", "stunningly obtuse", and "she can do her job — or she can get out".
Typical liberal hate points?

Fox News as reported by Breitbart. You can't get much more anti-"liberal" than that unless you invite Ann Coulter to the party.

[rstrong]

The Muslim Flight Attendant Who Won’t Serve Alcohol Was Suspended

Come all Christians, this lady needs some donations as well! Seth, get your wallet out!

So? She made her choice and the airline made theirs.

Funny though, how much your attitude is completely different when it comes to Davis despite similar circumstances.

[Seth Milner]

Funny though, how much your attitude is completely different when it comes to Davis despite similar circumstances.

How so? and what similar circumstances? Please elaborate.

[O Really]

Main difference: Davis is an elected government official; Stanley works in private industry. That makes a difference in whether a judge can order her to perform the work or be in contempt. If Davis had been an employee rather than elected, she could/would have been fired/suspended, exactly like Stanley. But the claim by each is identical: "I have a belief that says I can't perform an important part of my job, and you (employer) need to let me out of doing that part of my job."

[Seth Milner]

Funny though, how much your attitude is completely different when it comes to Davis despite similar circumstances.

How so? and what similar circumstances? Please elaborate.

Main difference: Davis is an elected government official; Stanley works in private industry. That makes a difference in whether a judge can order her to perform the work or be in contempt. If Davis had been an employee rather than elected, she could/would have been fired/suspended, exactly like Stanley. But the claim by each is identical: "I have a belief that says I can't perform an important part of my job, and you (employer) need to let me out of doing that part of my job."

OK. Thanks for the clarification of his statement. I didn't get the gist of rstrong's accusation, especially when I had previously written:
"I neither support or condone Ms. Davis' actions." I don't support or condone the flight attendant; the airline did what they felt was in the best interest of their business.
I still ask rstrong though, how is my attitude completely different?

[O Really]

"I neither support or condone Ms. Davis' actions." I don't support or condone the flight attendant; the airline did what they felt was in the best interest of their business.
?

Well, I could accurately say that "I neither support or condone Ms. Davis' actions," too, (I think you meant to have an "oppose" in there somewhere), but that's not really the question. She did what she did, and my or your approval or disapproval doesn't matter. The question is pretty simple to ask, however. What is an appropriate action for a judge to take when a person repeatedly refuses to comply with a court order? Since we no longer have stocks and floggings, it seems the choices are: (1) ignore it and allow the continued non-compliance, which of course would not be doing his job; (2) fine her; (3) toss her in jail. Continuing negotiations with her and her bottom feeding lawyer would also be reasonable, except that that path had pretty well run out of road.

Those who "support" Davis are saying that her clear and demonstrable contempt should be ignored because she's doing so based on her religion. So where does that path lead? The possibility of anyone being able to ignore court orders with impunity if they simply say "religion made me do it." This case is different from any other non-compliance contempt case only in that her "supporters" just don't like the law that she refused to follow, even though that train has not only left the station, but is long gone down the track. But they're happy to let Davis pretend to be a "martyr" on an issue she has no chance of winning. They all know the law isn't changing; that absent either an agreement to let the Deputies do their job or resigning, that the judge has little alternative to keeping Davis in jail. If they really wanted to "support" Davis, they'd send her a couple of real lawyers and encourage her to take a path that will let her keep her job. That path apparently remains open and so far the "supporters" aren't helping her go down it. With friends like those...