billy.pilgrim wrote:bet they would desecrate their panties if a swat team rolled in
I'm all for it. MRAPS, heavy weapon, the whole ten yards. Fuck a peaceful resolution. If these ARMED shitheads are willing to die, then- as the reichwing fucktards themselves are so quick to opine about moozlums- then let's give them the opportunity.
Go shoot them down. (confiscate their weapons first)
Spoken like a true peace-loving, right-to-life, anti-government, flaming equal rights, polished-language, flaming liberal.
I've yet to meet a Democrat-voting, liberal-leaning individual who knew any words containing more than four letters; plurals not included.
To be fair, the Republican "conservatives" you worship consistently advocate the exact same SWAT team / MRAPS / heavy weapon /shoot them down tactics. What sets Boatrocker aside as a liberal is only that he also advocates the same for white people.
Yes, there IS a traditionally liberal position there: Treat everyone the same under the law, and there's much more incentive for bad treatment and bad laws to be corrected.
Boatrocker is "right-to-life"? Looks like Seth Milner failed a word "containing more than four letters", again, plus arithmetic given that Boatrocker and billy.pilgrim posted 20 of them just before Seth Milner stupidly said they didn't know any.
I blew that one, didn't I? You're correct though; Boatrocker is definitely a "kill that baby before it's born" and a "kill anyone who disagrees with me" kind of guy. My bad. Thanks for pointing it out.
Don't take life too seriously; No one gets out alive
rstrong wrote:
To be fair, the Republican "conservatives" you worship. . . Vrede too is teaching you well; your posts are becoming identical. No original thoughts of your own; or is that too stressing for you?
. . consistently advocate the exact same SWAT team / MRAPS / heavy weapon /shoot them down tactics. If I were a republican, I might agree with you; but that would be a drastic move on my part.
What sets Boatrocker aside as a liberal is only that he also advocates the same for white people. Where do you fit in there?
Yes, there IS a traditionally liberal position there: Treat everyone the same under the law, and there's much more incentive for bad treatment and bad laws to be corrected.
"Treat everyone the same under the law". . . sounds like it. I'm sure he appreciates your being his mouth-piece, though.
Don't take life too seriously; No one gets out alive
Seth Milner wrote:Vrede too is teaching you well; your posts are becoming identical. No original thoughts of your own; or is that too stressing for you?
Ah, the true sign of the wingnut: It's impossible for more than one person to come to the same conclusion about your wingnuttery, so it has to be a conspiracy.
billy.pilgrim wrote:bet they would desecrate their panties if a swat team rolled in
I'm all for it. MRAPS, heavy weapon, the whole ten yards. Fuck a peaceful resolution. If these ARMED shitheads are willing to die, then- as the reichwing fucktards themselves are so quick to opine about moozlums- then let's give them the opportunity.
Go shoot them down. (confiscate their weapons first)
Spoken like a true peace-loving, right-to-life, anti-government, flaming equal rights, polished-language, flaming liberal.
I've yet to meet a Democrat-voting, liberal-leaning individual who knew any words containing more than four letters; plurals not included.
You've proven you have zero grasp of your own hypocrisy, and that usually goes along with a complete inability to grasp irony, as well. You're 2 and oh, again. Fucktard. That one has eight letters.
People are crazy and times are strange. I'm locked in tight, I'm out of range.
I used to care, but, things have changed.
I blew that one, didn't I? You're correct though; Boatrocker is definitely a "kill that baby before it's born" and a "kill anyone who disagrees with me" kind of guy. My bad. Thanks for pointing it out.
Killing babies is something you liying nazi fucktards should never get into discussions about. As for killing "anyone who disagrees with me," it's never just anyone, and it depends on what we disagree on. Most folks I just file under Too Fucking Stupid to Breathe on Their Own and let them go to hell in their own preferred fashion. A few, yeah, I'm all for giving Darwin a 30.06 hand.
Just as you and your lying wingnut posse would be screeching for right now, if those white moron inbreds in Oregon were black guys with guns, ya fucking liar.
Oh, and if you don't like the F-word, feel free to FOAD.
People are crazy and times are strange. I'm locked in tight, I'm out of range.
I used to care, but, things have changed.
Boatrocker wrote:
You've proven you have zero grasp of your own hypocrisy, and that usually goes along with a complete inability to grasp irony, as well. You're 2 and oh, again. Fucktard. That one has eight letters.
Killing babies is something you liying nazi fucktards should never get into discussions about. As for killing "anyone who disagrees with me," it's never just anyone, and it depends on what we disagree on. Most folks I just file under Too Fucking Stupid to Breathe on Their Own and let them go to hell in their own preferred fashion. A few, yeah, I'm all for giving Darwin a 30.06 hand.
Just as you and your lying wingnut posse would be screeching for right now, if those white moron inbreds in Oregon were black guys with guns, ya fucking liar.
Oh, and if you don't like the F-word, feel free to FOAD. (Fuck Off And Die)
"I've yet to meet a Democrat-voting, liberal-leaning individual who knew any words containing more than four letters; plurals not included."
OK . . . I was wrong; you know a few more words; your Mommy teach you those big words? I'm sure your kids had a grand old time around your house learning those nice words, huh? Whether I like the words or not is not the point; you've just proven what I said about Democrats and Liberals.
(now Vrede too, give me some hell over my dog photo)
Don't take life too seriously; No one gets out alive
I don't know the origin of the quote about "Dem voting Liberal..." but it doesn't take very long at all to discover that people of all political stripes can be foul-mouths - or not. On the other hand, looking at the education level of the hardest core right wingers might provide some clues as to who knows only one-syllable words.
LOL, I checked because I knew you'd post that. banni posting a vulgarity doesn't make you an iota less foulmouthed, nor does it make you any less hypocritical and ridiculous when you whine about others being foulmouthed. Personal responsibility much?
He takes particular issue with an enormous dildo and a “bag of dicks” that appear to be made out of candy—a form of snack, so I’m not sure what his beef is here.
PR fail. You never highlight that you're laughingstocks and that it's making you mad.
Comments:
“Really, guys, it’s too much.
We already have WAY too many dicks here.”
...but they’re really tiny...
Thanks. This should help put a stop to this accidental dildo-sending. Problem solved.
We’ll stop sending you dildos when you stop acting like dildos.
That’s not fair. A dildo can actually satisfy a woman.
He can dress the big dildos in fatigues and give them AR-47s. They’d fit right in
They should just send their excess dildos to my new section 501(c)(19) charity Dildos for Gringos, where we match up a needy dildo with an angry white male, so they may work out their terrible anger in a constructive way.
Ungrateful, ungrateful swine. Some of us are out here grinding from sunup to sundown, breaking our backs day in and day out in this great country for the dream, for the chance to one day own our own bags of dicks and enormous dildos. Do they know how many people out there are go without massive dildos every single day? What these men take for granted...absolutely appalling. I’m disgusted.
Vrede too wrote:PR fail. You never highlight that you're laughingstocks and that it's making you mad . . .
Yep. They have no idea what they're doing, on any level, and their only success so far is in shining a bright light on their own dumbassery.
Maybe we should let them stay there a while.
People are crazy and times are strange. I'm locked in tight, I'm out of range.
I used to care, but, things have changed.
Vrede too wrote:PR fail. You never highlight that you're laughingstocks and that it's making you mad . . .
Yep. They have no idea what they're doing, on any level, and their only success so far is in shining a bright light on their own dumbassery.
Maybe we should let them stay there a while.
We could build a wall around the buildings and make them pay for it. It would be a beautiful wall and people would come from everywhere to see this magnificent beautiful wall.
Entrepreneurs could set up snack and dildo stands outside our beautiful wall and people could purchase snacks and dildos to throw over the tremendous wall from the viewing platforms.
Then we should let them stay for a while, say 10 to 15 years, or until they admit that they are codfish.
Trump: “We had the safest border in the history of our country - or at least recorded history. I guess maybe a thousand years ago it was even better.”
So, this woman's lawyer thinks that a lethal crime by a homicidal and suicidal terrorist couple was a preventable crime? In order for a crime to be preventable, it has to be foreseeable. This, unlike an armed robbery at a convenience store, was not.
Not that I would support it, either, but a far stronger case can be made for suing the crafters of US policy over the last decades.
It's what's known as a Steve Dallas lawsuit. Forget who is responsible; you go after whoever has the most money regardless of how remotely they're linked to the incident.
And it's not a question of whether she'll get paid. It's whether the lawyer will get paid.
Having convinced a grieving widow to file suit, the lawyer will likely extract payment from the widow if he can't extract one from the county.
