Also, no credentials are listed for Greg White. NEWS TARGET doesn't even say that he writes articles, it calls them "posts". You pick the oddest sources, Wneglia.
Anyhow, the article is ridiculous on its face. No one is "taking" the Hammond Ranch, the poaching dispute and criminal arson by the Hammonds were on leased federal land.
Fail. The protesters occupied the Malhuer Refuge, not the Hammond Ranch or even the federal land the Hammonds were leasing.... This would also explain why U.S. authorities have been coming down so hard on protesters. Officials aren’t prosecuting individuals because of the Hammond controversy. Officials are coming down on protesters because they are occupying a valuable piece of land; a piece of land that was promised to the Russians.....
Then, there's the question of whether there's any uranium there at all, let alone "a gold mine" (dumb comparison) of it. There are no uranium mines in OR, possible deposits may not even reach as far north as the Hammonds' ranch, and demand and price are decreasing thanks to arms control and the collapse of the nuclear power industry. "Follow" what "money"?
Plus, the Hammonds have rejected any association with the VanillaISIS occupiers, another broken link in the imaginary chain.
Not that I'm a fan of the Clinton Foundation's dancing on the edge of ethical behavior, but your goofy claim based on a way inaccurate article from a secretive source would have been better called: Flubbed tortuous link to the Clintons.