I've only spilled twice in 15 or so years of heavy computer use, and the first time the computer was past due for replacement. I guess the convenience is worth the risk.
Vrede too wrote:I've only spilled twice in 15 or so years of heavy computer use, and the first time the computer was past due for replacement. I guess the convenience is worth the risk.
I eat a lot of meals at the computer. It's my newspaper and TV.
I haven't lost a keyboard yet, and keyboards are cheap.
Vrede too wrote:I've only spilled twice in 15 or so years of heavy computer use, and the first time the computer was past due for replacement. I guess the convenience is worth the risk.
You really ought to stand back from the computer when you're engaging in heavy computer use on the porn sites. Just sayin' . . . (Oh, that convenience being worth the risk thingy.)
Don't take life too seriously; No one gets out alive
Seth Milner wrote:If you weren't so much of a walking rectal-orifice and
Seth Milner wrote:You really ought to stand back from the computer when you're engaging in heavy computer use on the porn sites. Just sayin' . . . (Oh, that convenience being worth the risk thingy.)
If Seth Milner isn't Homerphobe, he's sure developing the same obsessions.
That's Laurel & Hardy - a Hollywood superstar duo in the late 1920s and 1930s.
It's Seth's way of expressing his delusion that if more than one person disagrees with him, they must somehow be working together. It's the sort of delusion usually seen in conspiracy theorists. (Granted, his often repeated "You gonna take away everyone's guns!!!" claim would qualify.)
rstrong wrote: (Granted, his often repeated "You gonna take away everyone's guns!!!" claim would qualify.)
You're a liar. Post a link(s) where I've said that.
That's why I post the Laurel & Hardy dancing gif that represents you and Vrede too. You both make up shit that I don't say, or twist what I do say to change it's meanings. Then YOU start in with your obsessive Huckabee/Palin bullshit. Grow up, little clown.
Don't take life too seriously; No one gets out alive
That's Laurel & Hardy - a Hollywood superstar duo in the late 1920s and 1930s. Wow JTA! Aren't you glad we have our own human encyclopedia to tell us any/every thing we didn't know?
I'm sure you didn't know who that was, huh? The nose knows!
Don't take life too seriously; No one gets out alive
Seth Milner wrote:I'm not a gunhugger; I just believe it's my right to own a gun of my choice, and to use it if deemed necessary.
Let me ask you and your fuming anti-gun cohorts this question: Let's suppose for a moment this nation was successful in banning and enforcing a ban on firearms; then what? Do you really think that firearms are going to magically disappear? Explain to me, specifically, what you, et al, define as "gun control", and if you had a hand in it, what your proposal would be.
England and Australia have the strictest gun laws, yet their gun-related incidents have not decreased; in fact they've increased.
No-one had suggested "banning and enforcing a ban on firearms." No-one was suggesting that they'd "magically disappear." And your claim about England and Australia was pure delusional wingnuttery.
You'll find plenty of other examples in the same thread - where everyone else is talking about merely holding gun owners to a higher level of responsibility for gun *ownership*, while you hallucinate it into things like holding them responsible for criminals' use of guns.
"Let's suppose for a moment this nation was successful in banning and enforcing a ban on firearms"
This statement is a far cry from your asinine claim of "his often repeated "You gonna take away everyone's guns!!!" claim"
As always, NO-ONE was talking about banning firearms, before once again you started arguing against against a ban on firearms. And you went on from there as if that's exactly what we were demanding. ("Do you really think that....")
As I noted, you need only to look through that thread to find other examples. And there are other threads where you've done it.
Your words are there for everyone to see. WHY you demanded that I post a link demonstrating with your own words what a dishonest, delusional little shit you are, I'll never know. But it's not something anyone has ever had trouble doing before. You're welcome.
If you want to move the goalposts again - like when you demonstrated what dishonest, delusional little shit you are over the torture issue - go ahead. But you can do your own research *.
* I kid. No-one believes that you're capable of doing your own research.
(Oh, that convenience being worth the risk thingy.)
Seth Milner isn't Homerphobe.
