The homophobic thread :>

[rstrong]

Your words are there for everyone to see. WHY you demanded that I post a link demonstrating with your own words what a dishonest, delusional little shit you are, I'll never know.

This BTW is just one more reason why you seem like such a Palin/Santorum/Carson/Trump fanboy. You make a stupid claim over and over again, on the record for everyone to see, for everyone to go back and check, and then suddenly one day you deny ever making it.

[Vrede too]

This is how all chats go with Seth Milner, regardless of topic. They devolve into discussion of how he's incapable of adult conversation and any issue back and forth is lost. Entertaining to the extent that it's fun to point out what a dishonest buffoon he is, but no intellectual stimulation is ever gained.

I've only spilled twice in 15 or so years of heavy computer use, and the first time the computer was past due for replacement. I guess the convenience is worth the risk.

I eat a lot of meals at the computer. It's my newspaper and TV.

I haven't lost a keyboard yet, and keyboards are cheap.

Ditto. Having breakfast right now less than 2 hours out of the shop. Wish me luck.

It's a laptop, keyboard fix isn't cheap.

[Vrede too]

Take action to make sure LGBT protections in North Carolina aren't overturned

Anti-LGBT extremists in the General Assembly are at it again. This time they are threatening to call a $42,000-a-day special legislative session in order to override Charlotte's recently passed nondiscrimination ordinance, which protects LGBT people and others from discrimination in public accommodations.

Tell your House representative to oppose the special session and support laws that extend equal treatment to LGBT North Carolinians.

[Seth Milner]

This is how all chats go with Seth Milner, regardless of topic. They devolve into discussion of how he's incapable of adult conversation and any issue back and forth is lost. Entertaining to the extent that it's fun to point out what a dishonest buffoon he is, but no intellectual stimulation is ever gained.

There's only four other adults here to "chat" with, and you know who two of them aren't. Speaking of entertaining, this forum is nothing but purely entertainment to me. When I want an anti-boredom fix, all I have to do is post some nonsense and watch you and your dance partner go into a mindless tail-spin while spitting and spewing your silly name-calling bullshit. Yes, it's fun, I'm glad to be humoring you. Spook says hi!

(Oh I forgot; that name is racist, sorry. I would have named him Bugger (Booger?), but then you would have screamed, cried,and brought out your list of adjectives because I was slurring homosexuals.)

Damn, can't win them all.

[Seth Milner]

I don't have a dog in this fight; not going to toss one in; but I found something mighty interesting about this so-called leader of transgender rights in N.C.; someone who thinks a man posing as a woman should be allowed to take a piss in the ladies room.

Take action to make sure LGBT protections in North Carolina aren't overturned

The homosexual leader of efforts in North Carolina to allow men to use women’s bathrooms is a convicted and registered sex offender, according to documents made available to Breitbart News.


Chad Sevearance is president of the Charlotte Business Guild, which describes itself as “a network of LGBT professionals, business owners, employees and individuals in the Charlotte area who meet to nurture a network of business contacts; encourage fellowship and support among community business, professional and charitable pursuits; and provide and promote positive role models in the LGBT community.”

Sevearance and his group have taken a lead role in seeking the right to allow males to use the restrooms and showers of females, including those of little girls, which is described by advocates as nothing more than nondiscrimination measures. Sevearance was quoted in the Charlotte Observer saying that because a recent bathroom “nondiscrimination ordinance” bill did not pass, “someone can ask me to leave a restaurant because I’m presumed to be gay or transgender.”

In 1998, Sevearance worked as a youth minister and in that capacity allegedly lured younger men to his apartment to spend the night where Severance showed them pornography and tried to talk them into sex. One boy testified that he woke up to find Severance “fondling him.” Severance was convicted on one charge of sexual molestation of a minor.

As a result of his 2000 conviction, Sevearance must register with the police on a regular basis for a minimum of ten years. His most recent mug shot and registration took place at the end of last year.

A reporter with the Charlotte Observer confirmed for Breitbart News that the Chad Sevearance they frequently quote is the same man who was convicted for sexual assault of a minor in 2000.

Repeated calls to the Charlotte Business Guild went unanswered.

Both the webpage and the Facebook page of Severance’s group have been disabled.

[O Really]

I don't know anything about this guy, or his group, but you do make some long jumps in assumptions. "so-called" leader of transgender rights in N.C" - apparently he's more than "so-called" whether or not he has a sketchy past. The Charlotte Business Guild was founded in 1992 as an advocacy and networking group for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender businesspeople, and has operated legally and constantly since that time. As president of the group, it would seem he qualifies as a "leader." Whether " a man posing as a woman" should be able to use a women's rest room isn't the question. Most would say "no"; however, if it's a good costume, most probably wouldn't know who was in the next stall anyway. But a transgender is not a "man posing as a woman" nor a "woman posing as a man."

In any case, it's a ridiculous argument to start with. It's not particularly shocking to find unisex restrooms lots of places ... including in most people's homes. I'll bet even in the homes of some who are screaming about the "posers."

[JTA]

Did you know that all new houses are built with unisex bathrooms?

[O Really]

Did you know that all new houses are built with unisex bathrooms?

We should get back to the good ol' days when houses all had bathrooms clearly marked with male and female.

[Vrede too]

In the very rare cases where a straight male will pretend to be trans in order to get into the wholly unsexy public bathroom environment, what's the difference from the lesbians that straight females share bathrooms with every day?

[Seth Milner]

But a transgender is not a "man posing as a woman" nor a "woman posing as a man."
Regardless what's hanging between the legs or on the chest; a male is born with male chromosomes and a female is born with female chromosomes. You can cut off and re-arrange the outside and parts of the inside plumbing; but you can't change the body's chromosomes; therefore a man is still a man and a woman is still a woman regardless what they look like on the outside. Personally, I don't care if they have a new asshole sewn on their back; I'm just stating the difference

In any case, it's a ridiculous argument to start with. It's not particularly shocking to find unisex restrooms lots of places ... including in most people's homes. I'll bet even in the homes of some who are screaming about the "posers."
Sure, there's unisex bathrooms, but generally they're not in use by two of the opposite sex at the same time. Would you want your wife to be in a restroom and a dude in a dress come sauntering in?

Still, that doesn't change the fact that the one pushing for the change is a convicted sex offender.
I'm guessing he wants to dress like a woman so he can entice teenage boys.

In the very rare cases where a straight male will pretend to be trans in order to get into the wholly unsexy public bathroom environment, what's the difference from the lesbians that straight females share bathrooms with every day?
Probably no different than the homosexual males that frequent wholly unsexy public bathroom environments hoping to cop a score.

[Seth Milner]

Did you know that all new houses are built with unisex bathrooms?

We should get back to the good ol' days when houses all had bathrooms clearly marked with male and female.

That would be a novelty, wouldn't it; especially since in the good old days many homes didn't even have an inside bathroom . . or toilet.

[rstrong]

Still, that doesn't change the fact that the one pushing for the change is a convicted sex offender.

"The one?" There are many people around the world fighting for these rights.

No matter how righteous and just your cause - Christianity, America, freedom of the press, civil rights, bacon... you'll always find a monster who supports it too. That doesn't make your cause any less right and just. It doesn't mean that you and everyone else should abandon the cause.

Just think of what it would mean for Christianity alone, given its wealth of sex offender ministers and priests. Including the one in your story.

[billy.pilgrim]

Did you know that all new houses are built with unisex bathrooms?

We should get back to the good ol' days when houses all had bathrooms clearly marked with male and female.

That would be a novelty, wouldn't it; especially since in the good old days many homes didn't even have an inside bathroom . . or toilet.

Yeah, but back in them good ol days, we made sure that the African-Americans only had "colored" bathrooms inside or outside their homes and us while people had white only bathrooms in or outside at our houses.

It was just the businesses we required to have Men bathrooms, Women bathrooms and Colored Only bathrooms.

If you were colored it didn't matter if you had a weenie, or not

[Seth Milner]

If you were colored it didn't matter if you had a weenie, or not

Apparently, today, regardless of your color, or how you're dressed, it's not going to make any difference if you have a weenie or not.

The subject isn't centered on racial equality. The subject is the difference between a male and a female.

If a man wants to change his sex, or just wear feminine clothing, or a woman does the same; that's no biggie, and none of my business; and as far as being part of the human race, they should be afforded the same rights as anyone else; however, I draw the line at a strange "woman" taking a shit in the stall next to me. Or a woman discovering that a pervert dressed as a woman is jerking off in the next stall while peeping at her or her young daughter.

Still, that doesn't change the fact that the one pushing for the change is a convicted sex offender.

"The one?" There are many people around the world fighting for these rights.
Sex offenders, you mean? That's interesting, but not surprising.
"Rights"? You mean the right for a man to dress as a woman and enter women's restrooms?

No matter how righteous and just your cause - Christianity, America, freedom of the press, civil rights . . . (stupidity deleted)
Yeah, I know. There's no place in society for common decency and common good sense anymore.

... you'll always find a monster who supports it too.
As evidenced by your rebuttal to my post.

That doesn't make your cause any less right and just. It doesn't mean that you and everyone else should abandon the cause.
:?:

Just think of what it would mean for Christianity alone, given its wealth of sex offender ministers and priests. Including the one in your story.
Who's side are you on?
What another former poster harped on and you screaming liberals downplay: "Just because someone calls themselves . . "

[JTA]

Still, that doesn't change the fact that the one pushing for the change is a convicted sex offender.

"The one?" There are many people around the world fighting for these rights.

No matter how righteous and just your cause - Christianity, America, freedom of the press, civil rights, bacon... you'll always find a monster who supports it too. That doesn't make your cause any less right and just. It doesn't mean that you and everyone else should abandon the cause.

Just think of what it would mean for Christianity alone, given its wealth of sex offender ministers and priests. Including the one in your story.

Hitler was a vegetarian and a nazi. Therefore all vegetarians are nazis.

Nah (just vegans).

[O Really]

So, Seth, it's your contention that all transgenders (whether totally or partially reconstructed and regardless of costume), and cross-dressers are all dangerous and looking to cause harm to people of the opposite sex in public bathrooms, is that it? Many would disagree. But let's put it in a real world context. Most transgendered people are not recognizable as such unless they tell you or for some other reason (like Caitlin Jenner) it's public knowledge. If a person looks like a woman (or man) and goes into the public restroom that matches their clothing, probably nobody will ever notice. Certainly nobody is going to come up with an easy way to screen them. (TSA guys patting down at the door to the loo?)

It's all a product of fear-mongering sleazy imaginations that has very little application in reality. I'm not saying some pedophile couldn''t dress up like a female and try to grab girls from the bathroom. They could. They also dress up like ice cream truck drivers, nice guys with lost dogs, and "friends of you mom." But pedophiles are a different issue from transgenders - unless, of course, you want to try to argue that all transgenders are pedophiles.

[billy.pilgrim]

If the subject is about different sexes peeing in the stall next to you and has nothing to do with race, then how come the single "colored only" bathroom isn't about all the different sexes peeing in the stalls next to each other.

And what about the repug wide stance senator, where does he pee?

If you were colored it didn't matter if you had a weenie, or not

Apparently, today, regardless of your color, or how you're dressed, it's not going to make any difference if you have a weenie or not.

The subject isn't centered on racial equality. The subject is the difference between a male and a female.

If a man wants to change his sex, or just wear feminine clothing, or a woman does the same; that's no biggie, and none of my business; and as far as being part of the human race, they should be afforded the same rights as anyone else; however, I draw the line at a strange "woman" taking a shit in the stall next to me. Or a woman discovering that a pervert dressed as a woman is jerking off in the next stall while peeping at her or her young daughter.

Still, that doesn't change the fact that the one pushing for the change is a convicted sex offender.

"The one?" There are many people around the world fighting for these rights.
Sex offenders, you mean? That's interesting, but not surprising.
"Rights"? You mean the right for a man to dress as a woman and enter women's restrooms?

No matter how righteous and just your cause - Christianity, America, freedom of the press, civil rights . . . (stupidity deleted)
Yeah, I know. There's no place in society for common decency and common good sense anymore.

... you'll always find a monster who supports it too.
As evidenced by your rebuttal to my post.

That doesn't make your cause any less right and just. It doesn't mean that you and everyone else should abandon the cause.
:?:

Just think of what it would mean for Christianity alone, given its wealth of sex offender ministers and priests. Including the one in your story.
Who's side are you on?
What another former poster harped on and you screaming liberals downplay: "Just because someone calls themselves . . "

[Seth Milner]

So, Seth, it's your contention that all transgenders (whether totally or partially reconstructed and regardless of costume), and cross-dressers are all dangerous and looking to cause harm to people of the opposite sex in public bathrooms, is that it? Many would disagree.
No, that's not what I'm saying. I'm addressing the impostors who would take advantage of such a silly law.

But let's put it in a real world context. Most transgendered people are not recognizable as such unless they tell you or for some other reason (like Caitlin Jenner) it's public knowledge. If a person looks like a woman (or man) and goes into the public restroom that matches their clothing, probably nobody will ever notice. Certainly nobody is going to come up with an easy way to screen them. (TSA guys patting down at the door to the loo?)
That's my point.

It's all a product of fear-mongering sleazy imaginations that has very little application in reality. I'm not saying some pedophile couldn''t dress up like a female and try to grab girls from the bathroom. They could. They also dress up like ice cream truck drivers, nice guys with lost dogs, and "friends of you mom." But pedophiles are a different issue from transgenders - unless, of course, you want to try to argue that all transgenders are pedophiles.
Again, that's my point. Why not leave things as they were? Out of sight, out of mind, you know? With the sex offender wanting to go public with his desire to "co-ed" toilets, he's done nothing more than incite your so-called "fear-mongering." You still didn't answer my question I asked you.

[Seth Milner]

If the subject is about different sexes peeing in the stall next to you and has nothing to do with race, then how come the single "colored only" bathroom isn't about all the different sexes peeing in the stalls next to each other.
I didn't live as an adult in that era; I can't answer that.

And what about the repug wide stance senator, where does he pee?
I can't answer that either; I don't keep up with repugs, demrats, or senators.

[Vrede too]

Shhhh, nobody tell Seth Milner that he's been sharing bathrooms with gay men and some women transitioned to men his entire life.