The homophobic thread :>

[JTA]

I don't know if you're a homophobe or not, but you might want to look up what percentage of homosexual people are pedophiles compared to the percentage of heterosexual people who are pedophiles. Unless, of course, the risk of a loose pedophile isn't really your real issue.

I have no real issues, Counselor. I'm simply expressing an opinion. As far as the percentages of homosexuals, yada, yada; I could care less how many does what, under whose window, or for how much.

That'll be the day, Seth Milner isn't capable of looking up anything real that and a homophobe wouldn't want to.

Unlike your life "Mr." Vrede too, my life doesn't revolve around activist activities, who's homosexual and who's not, who's liberal and who's con, how much the earth is shrinking, etc. I express an opinion. If I want to research it first, I will if I feel it's a subject serious enough to "debate". Your petty drivel is boring.

So what you're saying is, you do in fact care.

[Vrede too]

Lotta noise coming from that anxiety closet.

... Unless, of course, the risk of a loose pedophile isn't really your real issue.

... I could care less ...

Good call, O Really, and he was still stupid enough to admit it.

[Seth Milner]

So what you're saying is, you do in fact care.

As far as the percentages of homosexuals, yada, yada; I could care less how many does what, under whose window, or for how much.

[Seth Milner]

Lotta noise coming from that anxiety closet.

... Unless, of course, the risk of a loose pedophile isn't really your real issue.

... I could care less ...

Good call, O Really, and he was still stupid enough to admit it.

Way to go, stupid shit. Apply words from a different post to emphasize your ignorance.

[O Really]

I have no real issues, Counselor. I'm simply expressing an opinion. As far as the percentages of homosexuals, yada, yada; I could care less how many does what, under whose window, or for how much.

Sure, an "opinion" can be fact-free. But some, such as myself, like to glean at least a modicum of knowledge about something before developing an opinion. I could say, for example, that Florida sunsets are beautiful. That's one type of opinion, comparing beautiful to not-beautiful, and some say beauty is in the eye of the beholder. But if I say Florida sunsets are the most beautiful in the world, and haven't seen any sunsets anywhere but Florida, it's a pretty worthless opinion.

In your quixotic charge to protect fair damsels from pervert dragons, it would seem to be helpful to know where the risk comes from. Have you thought through the concept (that you implied) that a homosexual male would be dressed up as a female intending to assault females? Doesn't that kinda go against their homosexualness? Besides, other than for fun and sport at some parades or festivals, homosexual men rarely dress as females anyway. They aren't trying to be female. They're attracted to males. Transgenders, on the other hand (male to female type) are female oriented, and also would not be the ones likely to assault the females in the restroom. So who's left that creates a risk? Mostly straight male pedophiles or rapists who prey on children or women in public restrooms, and who choose to dress in drag to go in. More likely that sort of person would not be in drag, but would enter when no one is around and jump on someone who comes in alone, right? Criminals may not be the sharpest knives in the drawer, but they're not all dumber than rocks, either.

As to the gender or sexual habits of the person in the next stall, how would one know without peering under the stall wall?

[JTA]

So what you're saying is, you do in fact care.

As far as the percentages of homosexuals, yada, yada; I could care less how many does what, under whose window, or for how much.

So you don't care a lot about what they do, but you do in fact care some, because you could still care less, implying you do care.

[Vrede too]

JTA, Seth Milner failed English, again.

... Criminals may not be the sharpest knives in the drawer,

Neither is Seth Milner.

but they're not all dumber than rocks, either....

Seth Milner is.

In the very rare cases where a straight male will pretend to be trans in order to get into the wholly unsexy public bathroom environment, what's the difference from the lesbians that straight females share bathrooms with every day?

As O Really says, predators will predate, they sure don't need the unlikely choice of going in drag to public bathrooms with stalls to do so.

[O Really]

So a lot of places now have restrooms marked "family" usually in addition to "men" and "women." My question for the restroom paranoia-prone is, what is one allowed to wear into the "family" restroom?

[Vrede too]

Depends on the family.




Or:



Or:

[bannination]

how much the earth is shrinking, etc. I express an opinion. If I want to research it first, -

So you're an earth shrinker eh?

The Earth gains mass every day tweetledum.

[Seth Milner]

how much the earth is shrinking, etc. I express an opinion. If I want to research it first, -

So you're an earth shrinker eh?
The Earth gains mass every day tweetledum.

Vrede too has taught you well, doofus. Now get off your knees.

[Seth Milner]

Depends on the family.




Or:



Or:

Or:
The too-strong family:

[Seth Milner]

I've seen them up close. You can smell them long before you see them . . . seriously.

[Vrede too]

North Carolina just passed one of the nation's most anti-LGBTQ laws

... And on Wednesday, the North Carolina legislature held a special, $42,000-a-day session to pass a sweeping anti-LGBTQ bill that not only repeals Charlotte's ordinance, but bans future local laws that protect LGBTQ people. And on the exact same day, the governor signed the bill into law....

Most North Carolinians support these legal protections: In a 2015 survey by the Public Religion Research Institute, 64 percent of North Carolina respondents said they favor laws that protect LGBTQ people from discrimination in jobs, housing, and public accommodations. That was a little below the national average of 71 percent, but still a strong majority in favor of such protections....

One big risk: It could spark a national firestorm.... Eventually, the (Indiana) controversy forced the state legislature to clarify that the law is not meant to allow discrimination against LGBTQ people, but only after reportedly hurting its tourism industry....

Bigots like Seth Milner owe us a bunch of bake sales to cover their insistence that we all pay for their pathetic fear and hate.

North Carolina legislators touted the "bathroom myth" to defend their opposition to a ban

Behind Gov. McCrory and other North Carolina lawmakers' opposition to Charlotte's ordinance is the bathroom myth: the idea that if trans people are legally allowed to use the bathroom that corresponds to their gender identity, men will take advantage of the law to enter women's bathrooms to harass and sexually assault women. McCrory and others cited this myth to argue that Charlotte's law raises public safety concerns.

But even with the Charlotte ordinance, sexual assault remained illegal in Charlotte and North Carolina.

Moreover, there's absolutely no evidence that the passage of nondiscrimination laws leads to more sexual assaults or harassment.

Experts from 12 states with laws that protect LGBTQ people from discrimination told Media Matters that they don't know of a single reported instance of sexual assaults in bathrooms stemming from the laws.

In another investigation, Media Matters also found that 17 school districts around the country with protections for LGBTQ people, which collectively covered more than 600,000 students, had no problems with harassment in bathrooms or locker rooms after implementing their policies.

One big hurdle, which reportedly killed South Dakota's bathroom bill: Banning trans students from using the school bathroom that comports to their gender identity could violate federal law, particularly Title IX. The Justice Department and Department of Education interpret the law not just to ban sex discrimination in federally funded schools, but also ban anti-trans discrimination. So by passing an anti-trans bathroom law, North Carolina could risk big federal funds for public schools....

Once again, Seth Milner's pants-wetting cowardice and paranoia is shown to not be based on anything real, poor thing.

[Seth Milner]

Bigots like Seth Milner owe us a bunch of bake sales to cover their insistence that we all pay for their pathetic fear and hate.

Once again, Seth Milner's pants-wetting cowardice and paranoia is shown to not be based on anything real, poor thing.

"But even with the Charlotte ordinance, sexual assault remained illegal in Charlotte and North Carolina." . . . duh! ya think?

[Vrede too]

Lotta noise coming from that anxiety closet.

[Seth Milner]

Lotta noise coming from that anxiety closet.

Look again where the aniexty is . . .

[Vrede too]

Lotta noise coming from that anxiety closet.

Good boy.

[Seth Milner]

Lotta noise coming from that anxiety closet.

Good boy.

Still lusting after me . . .

[Vrede too]

Good boy.