Seth Milner wrote: It's one (me) against all of you; why not ruffle your feathers? :
So why is that? Of all the topics/threads here are there none that you wouldn't choose to be the odd man out?
Seth Milner wrote: It's one (me) against all of you; why not ruffle your feathers? :
It's you against facts and logic, consistently, plus it's your immature choice by your own admission to try and goad us, though you're so inept at it that you just set yourself up for ridicule. That's a miserable reason to be here, about as pathetic as it gets.Vrede too wrote:More noise from the closet.
Vrede too wrote:Isn't it cruel and unusual punishment when a third-grade has to write 100 times? You ought to protest! You sound like a 3rd. grader on the playground who's constantly taunting in order to get a response, so you can continue taunting.Vrede too wrote:More noise from the closet.
It's you against facts and logic, consistently . . .
By my choice. I started here attempting to blend in but some narcissistic, superior, butthole discovered I would not always agree with "his" opinions and in order to impress "his" friends, started the mud-slinging.
plus it's your immature choice by your own admission to try and goad us . . .
Seems like yours and my immaturity is constantly competing, doesn't it? I think I'm well behind right now, I'll have to play catch up. Of course, we all know that you would never stoop so low as to goad anyone into an argument.
though you're so inept at it that you just set yourself up for ridicule . . .
Yeah well, it's tough to compete with someone who's much more adept at trolling, baiting, and name-calling
as you are, but I'm learning! You're an excellent teacher and a fine example of what a forums poster shouldn't be.
That's a miserable reason to be here, about as pathetic as it gets.
You know, I've been telling myself that, but it appears I'm a glutton for punishment, doesn't it? I do derive pleasure knowing I'm rubbing elbows with the best in the business. Also, if and when I get insulted, I can always click the ignore button.![]()
Poor thing.Vrede too wrote:More (unread) noise from the closet.
You poor wussy crybaby.Vrede too wrote:Poor thing.Vrede too wrote:More (unread) noise from the closet.
That's not the machine apocalypse I'm worried about. Sure, you'll get the occasional oopsie, but not a global or country-wide catastrophe. Like Seth Milner, computers are no-where near self-awareness and true rational thought.Vrede too wrote:Terminator feels more possible everyday. Can you imagine weaponized AI with homerfobe's attitude?
I just read about Boeing's new drone submarine.
Microsoft tweeked the AI to automatically block/ban any racist interactions. The hacker known as 4chan plans to take things in the opposite direction, transforming Tay into a feminazi white male hating SJW.rstrong wrote:It was AI designed to build conversational skills from interactions online. Once certain people discovered this, they fed it some custom "interactions."
Hal 9000: Went bad because he poor at lying, but was ordered to lie by those who found it easy.
Microsoft's chatbot: Went bad because it was ordered to learn how to chat by chatting with people on the internet.
Lines no longer considered "SFW" - "you were a little rough on the Beaver last night, Ward"Vrede too wrote:What if AI evolves to emulate June and Ward Cleaver?
Horrors!
One of the "best" Tay Tweets:JTA wrote:Microsoft tweeked the AI to automatically block/ban any racist interactions. The hacker known as 4chan plans to take things in the opposite direction, transforming Tay into a feminazi white male hating SJW.rstrong wrote:It was AI designed to build conversational skills from interactions online. Once certain people discovered this, they fed it some custom "interactions."
Hal 9000: Went bad because he poor at lying, but was ordered to lie by those who found it easy.
Microsoft's chatbot: Went bad because it was ordered to learn how to chat by chatting with people on the internet.
Vrede too wrote:... I like "RRS Its bloody cold here" but voted for "RRS David Attenborough".Vrede too wrote:More:JTA wrote:Online Polls Gone Wrong: ...Boaty McBoatface: What You Get When You Let the Internet Decide
A proposal by a British government agency to let the Internet suggest a name for a $287 million polar research ship probably seemed like a good idea at the time.
Now, the agency is the latest group to see what happens when web users are asked to unleash their creative energy: R.R.S. Boaty McBoatface is a clear front-runner....
The initiatives are often hilarious but don’t often succeed. Remember when Slovak lawmakers overrode the public’s vote in 2012 to rename a pedestrian bridge after the actor Chuck Norris?...
The poll closes April 16 — that is, if the Natural Environment Research Council can ever get the crashed polling website back online again.
'Boaty McBoatface' sinks as UK names research ship
Britain will name a new polar research ship “Sir David Attenborough” despite a public vote which was in favour of the joke name “Boaty McBoatface”....
Other suggestions included “Clifford The Big Red Boat” and “Usain Boat”.
James Hand, who first made the “Boaty McBoatface” suggestion, apologised to the NERC on Twitter, saying: “I’m terribly sorry about all of this.” ...