The homophobic thread :>

[Vrede too]

... If Seth Milner's "lingering in the men's room" is a life, nttawwt, I'll pass....

Ay seth, are you an archaeologist cuz I got a bone that ain't been touched in years.

You know where to find him, JTA.

[Seth Milner]

Ay seth, are you an archaeologist cuz I got a bone that ain't been touched in years.
Sounds as though you've got a personal problem; I'm not an archaeologist.
I don't fool with fossils, past or present, male or female.

[Vrede too]

A federal court in Alabama today issued a permanent injunction that will prevent state officials from enforcing the state’s ban on marriage equality.

[rstrong]

And once again...

After Many Years of Ugly Anti-Gay Rhetoric, Hate-Blogger Jim Hoft Announces He’s Gay

[Vrede too]

Love the subtitle: "The Stupidest Man on the Internet is now the Stupidest Gay Man on the Internet"

Linked from your article:

Homophobes likely to be closet gays, study finds

There have been other studies. We're waiting, Seth Milner and homerfobe.

[Seth Milner]

And once again...
After Many Years of Ugly Anti-Gay Rhetoric, Hate-Blogger Jim Hoft Announces He’s Gay

Headline: After Many Years of Ugly Anti-Gay Rhetoric, Hate-Blogger Jim Hoft Announces He’s Gay
Maybe I missed something, but I read the article, and no where did I see he announced he was a homosexual. I did read this:

"I’ve been a conservative activist for years. But today I’m coming out as a conservative gay activist."
That's hardly saying "I'm a homosexual".

[Seth Milner]

There have been other studies. We're waiting, Seth Milner and homerfobe.

From what I've read in past posts, you're no longer waiting on homerfobe; you two know each other quite well.

Your baiting won't work; your blowing out your ass again; you know I'm not homophobic.

[O Really]

And once again...
After Many Years of Ugly Anti-Gay Rhetoric, Hate-Blogger Jim Hoft Announces He’s Gay

Headline: After Many Years of Ugly Anti-Gay Rhetoric, Hate-Blogger Jim Hoft Announces He’s Gay
Maybe I missed something, but I read the article, and no where did I see he announced he was a homosexual. I did read this:

"I’ve been a conservative activist for years. But today I’m coming out as a conservative gay activist."
That's hardly saying "I'm a homosexual".

I think he did... http://www.breitbart.com/big-government ... can-party/

[Vrede too]

Headline: After Many Years of Ugly Anti-Gay Rhetoric, Hate-Blogger Jim Hoft Announces He’s Gay
Maybe I missed something, but I read the article, and no where did I see he announced he was a homosexual. I did read this:

"I’ve been a conservative activist for years. But today I’m coming out as a conservative gay activist."
That's hardly saying "I'm a homosexual".

"coming out ... gay" = "hardly ... homosexual"

:?: :?: :?:

[Seth Milner]

I think he did... http://www.breitbart.com/big-government ... can-party/

I stand corrected; in a round-about way. Two different articles, I commented on the link rstrong provided.

Headline: After Many Years of Ugly Anti-Gay Rhetoric, Hate-Blogger Jim Hoft Announces He’s Gay
Maybe I missed something, but I read the article, and no where did I see he announced he was a homosexual. I did read this:
"I’ve been a conservative activist for years. But today I’m coming out as a conservative gay activist."
That's hardly saying "I'm a homosexual".

"coming out ... gay" = "hardly ... homosexual"

You're saying that if someone is a "conservative gay-activist", they're a homosexual?

[O Really]

I think he did... http://www.breitbart.com/big-government ... can-party/

I stand corrected; in a round-about way. Two different articles, I commented on the link rstrong provided.

Oferpetesake, Seth. Doesn't it get tiring playing dense? The first article was interpreted by most everybody to mean the guy came out as gay. You interpreted it differently. The second article just clarified it for you. BTW, one could say (although it would be laughable) that they are a "conservative gay rights activist" and carry no connotation about their own orientation. But saying one is a "gay activist" is as clear as any other adjective in a similar sentence would be. "Blonde activist" " American activist" whatever.

[Vrede too]

Plus, "coming out" has a specific and intentional meaning in this context. Seth Milner fails English, again.

"playing dense"? Playing? He's still befuddled by alternate meanings of "gay" that have been around for hundreds of years.
http://www.blueridgedebate.com/viewtopi ... start=1120

[bannination]

Meanwhile, this is what they're installing in the new trans bathrooms.

[bannination]

There have been other studies. We're waiting, Seth Milner and homerfobe.

From what I've read in past posts, you're no longer waiting on homerfobe; you two know each other quite well.

Your baiting won't work; your blowing out your ass again; you know I'm not homophobic.

I call bullshit.
'BULLSHIT!

[Vrede too]

Seth Milner: I'm not homophobic, I just post like I am.

[rstrong]

Seth Milner: I'm not homophobic, I just post like I am.

He's also claimed repeatedly that he's not partisan. In between posting mindlessly partisan nonsense.

[Seth Milner]

There have been other studies. We're waiting, Seth Milner and homerfobe.

From what I've read in past posts, you're no longer waiting on homerfobe; you two know each other quite well.
Your baiting won't work; you're blowing out your ass again; you know I'm not homophobic.

I call bullshit.
'BULLSHIT!

Exactly what I said: Vrede is blowing bullshit out his ass again. Thank you for calling like it is; I'm proud of you, you big ol' bad administrator you!

[Seth Milner]

Seth Milner: I'm not homophobic, I just post like I am.
So tell me, O' Highly Offended One, in what way(s) am I homophobic?

He's also claimed repeatedly that he's not partisan. In between posting mindlessly partisan nonsense.
I'm merely following examples of those here who post their own silly bullshit.

[O Really]

Nothing wrong with being partisan. Politics is a team sport. Problem arises when loyalty to party overrides reason and logic, a situation in which Ryan, et. al. finds themselves now. Problem also arises when loyalty to a party has someone voting (or supporting) against their own interests. I am a partisan Democrat. There are very few instances in which I would vote for the non-Democrat in any election, even if the non-Democrat were otherwise a good choice. Why? (see sentence 2, above). But if Trump were the Democrat candidate, I would not vote for him, and would work against him.

[rstrong]

A big shout out to Greensboro, North Carolina!