Good question, but possibly none. According to Nate Silver, "...contemporary presidential elections are bound to be relatively close because both parties have high floors on their support. Indeed, we’ve gone seven straight elections without a double-digit popular vote victory (the last one was Ronald Reagan’s in 1984), the longest such streak since 1876-1900."Vrede too wrote:Whether one thinks that Hillary deserves to be called a flawed person or not, she is undeniably a flawed candidate. How many of the Dem candidates you list would only have been ahead of Trump by an average of 6.2%
Hillary
- O Really
- Admiral
- Posts: 23182
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm
Re: Hillary
- Vrede too
- Superstar Cultmaster
- Posts: 57344
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:46 am
- Location: Hendersonville, NC
Re: Hillary
Yeah . . . but it's Trump.
I just found this comment under an article:


With now three different management groups in just 8 weeks ...... Donald Trump is running the 'Cleveland Browns' of campaigns.
F' ELON
and the
FELON
1312. ETTD
and the
FELON
1312. ETTD
- O Really
- Admiral
- Posts: 23182
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm
Re: Hillary
It's Trump, but don't forget he was in fairly decent shape before the convention. Sure, he was pandering to the red meat-eaters and droolers, but everybody expected him to do something different for the general election. Instead, he just kept getting worse. So as of both conventions, I think the numbers would have been fairly close no matter which Dem was running. And after, they started to diverge fairly quickly with Hillary pulling substantially ahead. So would generic Dems Kerry, Gore, et. al. pull away quicker? Maybe, but considering how unpopular she is, Hillary is so far taking Trump to the shed pretty handily. And most polls showed none of the others in the clown car would beat her, either, except for Kasich, who was never going to get nominated by the loons.
- Vrede too
- Superstar Cultmaster
- Posts: 57344
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:46 am
- Location: Hendersonville, NC
Re: Hillary
Vrede too wrote:100 years ago:Hillary Clinton's Nomination Coincides With Another Female Politician's Historic Victory
Hillary Clinton’s shattering this week of the highest, hardest glass ceiling in politics comes almost a century after another female politician celebrated a historic victory.
In 1916, Montanan Jeannette Rankin became the first woman elected to Congress. Rankin, a Republican, found her calling in the women's suffrage movement before heading to Washington.
Her feat, in some ways, was even more impressive than Clinton’s becoming the first woman to top a major presidential ticket considering it came at a time when many women didn't even have the right to vote....
Has Anything Changed for Female Politicians?Vrede too wrote:... Jeanette Rankin, 1st woman in Congress (MT, 1917), before national suffrage:
You stand on the shoulders of giants, Hillary. Young me might never have predicted a black as POTUS or that a woman might be.
Familiar echoes in the candidacy of Jeannette Rankin, the first woman elected to Congress.

F' ELON
and the
FELON
1312. ETTD
and the
FELON
1312. ETTD
- Vrede too
- Superstar Cultmaster
- Posts: 57344
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:46 am
- Location: Hendersonville, NC
Re: Hillary
How much do you know about Hillary Rodham Clinton? Take our quiz.
"Your score: 19 Correct, 8 Wrong
You answered 19 of 27 questions correctly for a total score of 70%.
Average reader score 60%."
So far, understanding that we'll never be unanimous on each item, the list includes:
She's better than Trump (or any other Republican). It really doesn't matter if she's the Devil's concubine or if she's the reincarnation of Tammany Hall.
Really no worse than Colin Powell and really, really no worse than Jeb!
Tried to get us universal healthcare 23 years ago, and took a truckload of unwarranted personal heat for it.
Has always kept fighting effectively no matter what was thrown at her.
Once having left Arkansas she never went back ("probably" a positive for her and Arkansas).
Hillary has the most directly applicable professional experience of most any other Presidential candidate, ever. And in all those jobs, she has done a competent job.
Building relationships and bridges. Hillary understands that.
Will try to overturn Citizens United and increase transparency in campaign funding.
Corrupt but competent, not slimy and shoddy.
Good DNC speaker lineup.
Fluent in Spanish VP pick.
Long time children's advocate.
Most progressive Dem Platform ever.
The Supreme Court!!!
Would be our 1st female Head of State, thus catching us up with several Muslim nations.
Mythological.
Better option for having access to all US nuclear weapons.
Looked great for her DNC speech, better than 1960 Nixon.
Doesn't look good on the honesty front except when you stand her next to ANYONE in the 2016 or 2012 Republican clown cars. And probably a few election cycles before that.
Crusader for the downtrodden.
Spent a long time advocating for women's rights, access to healthcare and more.... a successful woman ... she's set a good example in that regard.
A highly successful person who is capable of being President of the United States ... setting an example for anyone who cares to about it that hard work and persistence toward a goal can sometimes pay off - even against big odds.
Heroic.
She's the "family values" candidate. Never divorced, no affairs, didn't walk away from her marriage when her husband had an affair, no accusations of rape or sexual harassment.
Like "the hated New England (Patriots)" or like the mediocre Buffalo Bills, both of which are better than the Cleveland Browns.
Take the quiz if you're going to before opening the list addition spoilers.
"Your score: 19 Correct, 8 Wrong
You answered 19 of 27 questions correctly for a total score of 70%.
Average reader score 60%."
So far, understanding that we'll never be unanimous on each item, the list includes:
She's better than Trump (or any other Republican). It really doesn't matter if she's the Devil's concubine or if she's the reincarnation of Tammany Hall.

Really no worse than Colin Powell and really, really no worse than Jeb!

Tried to get us universal healthcare 23 years ago, and took a truckload of unwarranted personal heat for it.
Has always kept fighting effectively no matter what was thrown at her.
Once having left Arkansas she never went back ("probably" a positive for her and Arkansas).
Hillary has the most directly applicable professional experience of most any other Presidential candidate, ever. And in all those jobs, she has done a competent job.
Building relationships and bridges. Hillary understands that.
Will try to overturn Citizens United and increase transparency in campaign funding.
Corrupt but competent, not slimy and shoddy.

Good DNC speaker lineup.
Fluent in Spanish VP pick.
Long time children's advocate.
Most progressive Dem Platform ever.
The Supreme Court!!!
Would be our 1st female Head of State, thus catching us up with several Muslim nations.
Mythological.
Better option for having access to all US nuclear weapons.
Looked great for her DNC speech, better than 1960 Nixon.

Doesn't look good on the honesty front except when you stand her next to ANYONE in the 2016 or 2012 Republican clown cars. And probably a few election cycles before that.
Crusader for the downtrodden.
Spent a long time advocating for women's rights, access to healthcare and more.... a successful woman ... she's set a good example in that regard.
A highly successful person who is capable of being President of the United States ... setting an example for anyone who cares to about it that hard work and persistence toward a goal can sometimes pay off - even against big odds.
Heroic.
She's the "family values" candidate. Never divorced, no affairs, didn't walk away from her marriage when her husband had an affair, no accusations of rape or sexual harassment.
Like "the hated New England (Patriots)" or like the mediocre Buffalo Bills, both of which are better than the Cleveland Browns.
Take the quiz if you're going to before opening the list addition spoilers.
Spoiler:
F' ELON
and the
FELON
1312. ETTD
and the
FELON
1312. ETTD
- rstrong
- Captain
- Posts: 5889
- Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:32 am
- Location: Winnipeg, MB
Re: Hillary
Hillary's opponents - even among Democrats - like to claim that she voted for Bush II's invasion and occupation.Vrede too wrote:Voted against President Bush’s big tax-cut packages of 2001 and 2003.
She didn't. She voted to authorize military force after Bush II made an appeal that getting the vote would be a strong piece of leverage in order to finish the UN inspections.
But then Bush II went back on his word, didn't give the inspectors enough time, and invaded. And of course, Bush II and friends were outright lying about the evidence for WMDs.
Even if Hillary expected military force was inevitable, that could mean Tomahawk strikes or special forces raids on the WMD locations - or anywhere else that would hurt Saddam. It doesn't reasonably mean a full invasion and decade-long occupation of the entire country.
- Vrede too
- Superstar Cultmaster
- Posts: 57344
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:46 am
- Location: Hendersonville, NC
Re: Hillary
Most congressional Dems knew better, 147 - 111, and it was arguably the worst US resolution of the 21st Century. I think it's a better strategy to say she was wrong, as she has, than to try and make the case that she wasn't wrong.
F' ELON
and the
FELON
1312. ETTD
and the
FELON
1312. ETTD
- O Really
- Admiral
- Posts: 23182
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm
Re: Hillary
It's not really about Hillary directly, but Huma Abedin is finally dumping the Weiner.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/anthon ... &ocid=iehp
Republicans bashed her for standing by him, anybody want to take bets on how long it will take them to bash her for dumping him?
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/anthon ... &ocid=iehp
Republicans bashed her for standing by him, anybody want to take bets on how long it will take them to bash her for dumping him?
- rstrong
- Captain
- Posts: 5889
- Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:32 am
- Location: Winnipeg, MB
Re: Hillary
How long? There's no time interval involved.O Really wrote:Republicans bashed her for standing by him, anybody want to take bets on how long it will take them to bash her for dumping him?
To Republicans, female Democrats exist in a quantum state. Unnatural, unintuitive and and inexplicable by classical physics. Simultaneously both naïve and incompetent, yet cold and calculating. Inexperienced, yet Washington insiders. Elected "only because she's a woman", yet unqualified because she's a woman. Anti-marriage if she leaves a cheating husband, but "approving" the cheating if she stays with him. (Someone here made that claim not long ago.)
- neoplacebo
- Admiral of the Fleet
- Posts: 12446
- Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 1:42 pm
- Location: Kingsport TN
Re: Hillary
I wager it'll be on the Faux News shows starting this evening.O Really wrote:It's not really about Hillary directly, but Huma Abedin is finally dumping the Weiner.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/anthon ... &ocid=iehp
Republicans bashed her for standing by him, anybody want to take bets on how long it will take them to bash her for dumping him?
- Vrede too
- Superstar Cultmaster
- Posts: 57344
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:46 am
- Location: Hendersonville, NC
Re: Hillary
Interesting:
FBI Played Trick on Clinton During Email Probe, Newly Released Documents Show
Not that such things matter to HDS cons.
FBI Played Trick on Clinton During Email Probe, Newly Released Documents Show
Not that such things matter to HDS cons.
F' ELON
and the
FELON
1312. ETTD
and the
FELON
1312. ETTD
-
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 2334
- Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2015 7:52 pm
- Location: Somewhere on Lake Keowee, SC
- rstrong
- Captain
- Posts: 5889
- Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:32 am
- Location: Winnipeg, MB
Re: Hillary
Yes, Mr. Trump.
(What pray tell did Hillary forget about her emails or the Benghazi hearing?)

(What pray tell did Hillary forget about her emails or the Benghazi hearing?)
-
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 2334
- Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2015 7:52 pm
- Location: Somewhere on Lake Keowee, SC
Re: Hillary
You've already forgotten?rstrong wrote:Yes, Mr. Trump.![]()
(What pray tell did Hillary forget about her emails or the Benghazi hearing?)

Don't take life too seriously; No one gets out alive
- rstrong
- Captain
- Posts: 5889
- Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:32 am
- Location: Winnipeg, MB
Re: Hillary
You're unable to name anything?Seth Milner wrote:You've already forgotten?rstrong wrote:Yes, Mr. Trump.![]()
(What pray tell did Hillary forget about her emails or the Benghazi hearing?)
-
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 2334
- Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2015 7:52 pm
- Location: Somewhere on Lake Keowee, SC
Re: Hillary
You first.rstrong wrote:You're unable to name anything?Seth Milner wrote:You've already forgotten?rstrong wrote:Yes, Mr. Trump.![]()
(What pray tell did Hillary forget about her emails or the Benghazi hearing?)
Don't take life too seriously; No one gets out alive
- rstrong
- Captain
- Posts: 5889
- Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:32 am
- Location: Winnipeg, MB
Re: Hillary
In other words, no.Seth Milner wrote:You first.rstrong wrote:You're unable to name anything?Seth Milner wrote:You've already forgotten?rstrong wrote:Yes, Mr. Trump.![]()
(What pray tell did Hillary forget about her emails or the Benghazi hearing?)
You made the claim. If you can't back it up, why would you expect me to?
-
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 2334
- Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2015 7:52 pm
- Location: Somewhere on Lake Keowee, SC
Re: Hillary
I posted a meme that made the claim. I make no claim to it's accuracy/inaccuracy.rstrong wrote:You made the claim. If you can't back it up, why would you expect me to?
Don't take life too seriously; No one gets out alive
- rstrong
- Captain
- Posts: 5889
- Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:32 am
- Location: Winnipeg, MB
Re: Hillary
As always for you, it was based on a mindless Trump / Tea Party claim.Seth Milner wrote:I posted a meme that made the claim. I make no claim to it's accuracy/inaccuracy.