Why is Obama still lying about this?

[Leo Lyons]

I guess asking for logic and honesty from con extremists is just way too much to ask.

What would be the point? You dickheads wouldn't know logic and honesty if it slapped you in the face.

[Leo Lyons]

Obama has stated that he knew the embassy was under attack.

Please try again.

Why didn't he get those poor people help? Why didn't he protect them.

Because he doesn't have a blue suit with a red cape.

You jerkoff liberal Democrats seem to think so; are you lying?

[Leo Lyons]

Your dipshit president is not lily-white, dumbass; and I'm not speaking of skin color. You're one gullible dimwit if you think otherwise.

Nice of you to make such charges without a shred of evidence.
"Your president is not lily-white. He's guilty of something. I don't know what, and I have no proof, but I really, really, really, really hate him, so he is guilty of something." End of discussion. Dumbass.

No, I don't hate Broncobomma. The only people I hate are queers, pedophiles, murderers, and addicts. If you or Bronco fall into that category, then you're one that I hate.

Now back to the subject. Did you ever work for the government? Why are you so sure I haven't a shred of evidence? What evidence do you have to counter with to refute me?

You sit behind your keyboard with your ass in high gear refuting everything that anybody, that isn't liberal in their thinking, says,
and then you assault them with a barrage of foul names. You useless piece of shit, you and your clones in this forum is not worth the tissue it takes to wipe the ass of anyone on here that you refer to as 'cons'.

Generally, you don't see 'cons' calling you f**kfaces names and belittling you with their superior attitudes, so all of you can go straight to hell. You don't like that? Complain to that piece of shit you call your president.

[Stinger]

I guess asking for logic and honesty from con extremists is just way too much to ask.

What would be the point? You dickheads wouldn't know logic and honesty if it slapped you in the face.

Says the one who never presents it.

Still waiting for you to discredit anything I've ever posted.

You and Butt Ugly can't even discuss and issue. All you can do is sit of the sidelines at take potshots at the adults like a bunch of old harpies. Never argue any topic. Never post support. Never discredit the support anyone else posts.

Just sit around and say, "You're stupid for disagreeing with an ignorant dumbass like me. Nanny-nanny-boo-boo."

Best you can do.

[Stinger]

I guess asking for logic and honesty from con extremists is just way too much to ask.

What would be the point? You dickheads wouldn't know logic and honesty if it slapped you in the face.

Just one more way to keep from posting any support for your arguments.

Since you seem to be stuck on chickenchit, I'll give you a little push. Finish the following sentence.

"Your president isn't lily-white. I know this for absolute certain because . . . ."

[Stinger]

Then why aren't you waiting before joining the wingnut chorus?

The chorus is sung after the moonbats finish singing each stanza; you moonbats keep adding stanzas.

What have I posted about Libya that is unsupported, untrue or moonbatty?

You want proof from Leo the Lyin'?

All you'll ever get is more Big-Ugly-style chicken clucking. He'll make a few snide comments about others, but he sure as hell won't ever man up and debate a topic.

[Leo Lyons]

I guess asking for logic and honesty from con extremists is just way too much to ask.

What would be the point? You dickheads wouldn't know logic and honesty if it slapped you in the face.

Just one more way to keep from posting any support for your arguments.

Since you seem to be stuck on chickenchit, I'll give you a little push. Finish the following sentence.
"Your president isn't lily-white. I know this for absolute certain because . . . ."

There's no point in arguing anything with you; what part of "You dickheads wouldn't know logic and honesty if it slapped you in the face" are you having trouble comprehending? No one can have an intelligent debate with you because you lack the intelligence to carry on a conversation without you responding with your bold red 'chickenchit' name calling and belittling. You're just a first class asshole.

Here, I'll give you a push with your third-grade mentality statement; finish the following sentence: "My president is lily-white. I know this for absolute certain because . . . ."

You want proof from Leo the Lyin'? Watch yourself in a mirror for a while.

[Leo Lyons]

Then why aren't you waiting before joining the wingnut chorus?

The chorus is sung after the moonbats finish singing each stanza; you moonbats keep adding stanzas.

What have I posted about Libya that is unsupported, untrue or moonbatty?

I was generalizing your question about the chorus.

Seems your thoughts are stuck on your new-found phrases you've learned in the past few weeks:
FUBAR and Exploiting dead soldiers. You're a real piece of witticism.

[AntiAlias]

In other news, Leo Lyons constantly recognizes dickheads slapping him in the face.

[Leo Lyons]

In other news, Leo Lyons constantly recognizes dickheads slapping him in the face.

Nope...you ain't slapped me one time.

[Sometime Lefty]

Is there a PUI (Posting Under the Influence) statute on this forum?

[Leo Lyons]

You and Butt Ugly can't even discuss and issue. All you can do is sit of the sidelines at take potshots at the adults like a bunch of old harpies.
Well, we used to take potshots at the adults, but you damn little children kept getting in the way.

Never argue any topic. Never post support. Never discredit the support anyone else posts.
We've already covered that. It's like talking to a blaring loudspeaker.

Just sit around and say, "You're stupid for disagreeing with an ignorant dumbass like me. Nanny-nanny-boo-boo."
Nice to see you admit to being an ignorant dumbass.
You gonna have your own TV show called Nanny-nanny-boo-boo. You go boy, you've earned it!

Is there a PUI (Posting Under the Influence) statute on this forum?

Strange you should ask that now. That should have been asked long before it was announced that this would be an uncensored forum where anyone could call you any name they wanted to. I've taken the liberty to give back similar to what is being given.

[Sometime Lefty]

Please it's Mr. Lefty!! I was talking about The Piper/Leo Lyons.

[Bungalow Bill]

Just another tiresome old homophobe who won't like the future.

[Stinger]

Now back to the subject.

You're too much the wuss to actually discuss a topic. Instead of discussing or debating a topic and demonstrating how ignorant and incompetent you really are, you will try to say things to appear clever.

Fail.


Did you ever work for the government?

See? Instead of backing up your assertions, you create some straw man to attack. Irrelevant. Pointless. Your life in a nutshell.

Why are you so sure I haven't a shred of evidence?

Because you don't have any. You've never discussed a topic before. You don't have the brains or the balls to actually debate a topic.


What evidence do you have to counter with to refute me?

What is it with the nutjobs and the chickenchit illogic? It's a frickin' epidemic. Is it contagious or are they all that frickin' clueless?

First, you can't prove a negative, dumbass. There's a gaggle of bigfoots having a kegger in my backyard. What evidence do you have to counter with to refute me?

Second, it's not my job, forum toddler. If you assert something is factual in a debate and your assertion is questioned, it's YOUR frickin' job to prove YOUR frickin' assertion.

That is, unless you're a frickin' wuss who has to squat to pee.

You sit behind your keyboard with your ass in high gear refuting everything that anybody, that isn't liberal in their thinking, says,

No, I refute anything that anyone says that isn't true. It's just that 98% of the lies, distortions, and factual errors seem to be coming from the unhinged Obama-haters who have a deep-seated need to twist the facts to fit their prejudices.

And, yes, I do refute them with information from credible sources.

Sorry you can't keep up. Maybe you should find a kiddie forum somewhere where everyone's gullible enough to chug the Kool Aid and not intelligent enough to apply common sense and critical judgment.

and then you assault them with a barrage of foul names.

Only when they stay stuck on stupid. I don't suffer fools gladly.

Everyone's makes mistakes, but when you refuse to admit or correct your mistake in the face of contrary evidence that's true beyond reasonable doubt, you're a dipshit.

Poor wittle you. You want to act like a dumbass, but you don't want anyone to call you a dumbass.

Grow a pair.

You useless piece of shit,

Coming from a mouth-breather like you, that's probably one of the best compliments I could get.

you and your clones in this forum is not worth the tissue it takes to wipe the ass of anyone on here that you refer to as 'cons'.

Right. You gullible, deluded dumbasses JUST BELIEVE every cockamamie nutjob fairy tale that comes down the pike, and the ones who are too smart to do so aren't worthy.

More of your dumbass illogic.

Generally, you don't see 'cons' calling you f**kfaces names and belittling you with their superior attitudes,

Bull . . . Shit!!! I came to the Blue Ridge forum and started discussing politics, and the next thing I know, the Three (Combined IQ) Stooges are out belittling me and calling me names because I could prove my assertions and they couldn't.

so all of you can go straight to hell. You don't like that? Complain to that piece of shit you call your president.

You're not significant enough for me to call the dog pound.

And after the predictable rant, you're right back where I said you would be -- yammering and stammering with no proof to back up anything you said.

You spouted off and have no proof. You ran your mouth and can't back it up.

SSDD.

And like a true con, when your nose is rubbed in your incompetence, you blame someone else.

[The Piper]

Please it's Mr. Lefty!! I was talking about The Piper/Leo Lyons.

And what is that comment supposed to mean? Are you insinuating that I and Leo are one and the same?
How do you reach that conclusion?
I don't know where or why you reached that assumption, but you are WRONG.
I don't even recall that I've ever commented on one of your posts.

An explanation is in order.....an apology is not out of the question.

[Stinger]

You and Butt Ugly can't even discuss and issue. All you can do is sit of the sidelines at take potshots at the adults like a bunch of old harpies.
Well, we used to take potshots at the adults, but you damn little children kept getting in the way.

Funny how the damn little children can discuss issues intelligently and post supporting evidence while you can only snipe from the sidelines.

Never argue any topic. Never post support. Never discredit the support anyone else posts.
We've already covered that. It's like talking to a blaring loudspeaker.

That's the little excuse you keep telling yourself whenever your awareness of your incompetence grows too large to ignore. I don't know if you're dumb enough to fall for it, but we sure aren't.

Just sit around and say, "You're stupid for disagreeing with an ignorant dumbass like me. Nanny-nanny-boo-boo."
Nice to see you admit to being an ignorant dumbass.
You gonna have your own TV show called Nanny-nanny-boo-boo. You go boy, you've earned it!

Didn't "admit" anything, dumbass. That's just your illiteracy having a symbiotic reaction with your stupidity.

I was quoting you. I don't call people stupid for disagreeing with me. I call people stupid for disagreeing with the facts.

You're the one sitting on the sidelines making comments about people you're afraid to debate.

[The Piper]

I miss everything! Gone a few hours, miss a brawl, get called someone else's name; damn it all!

Somebody Left The Cage Door Open!!!

[Tertius]

Howard your original question must be rhetorical. Obama lies about everything.

[Bungalow Bill]

Pin the tail on the nutjob.