The "Benghazi was caused by a YouTube video" claim is fake new on your side's part.
There were in fact a number of riots across the middle-east that were undeniably motivated by the video. And so in the hours after the attack the administration merely refused to label it terrorism until the facts came in. By the evening following the attack, Hillary's position was saying,"we know the attack in Libya had nothing to do with the film. It was a planned attack, not a protest."
Obama even took flak from those on the right rallying gullible partisan wingnuts - see mirror for details - because the day after the attack he called it an "act of terror" rather than "terrorism."
Also there's nothing "fake news" about peaceful protests. (If you disagree, we can also use any number of violent protests to paint whites as never having peaceful protests.) Nor was "Hands Up Don't Shoot" "fake news." It was inaccurate in the Michael Brown case, but given the many cases where it IS accurate, it was a reasonable assumption at the time. But your latest attempt to get racist alt-right street cred is noted.
"When the stupidity and offensiveness of your alt-right post is pointed out..." Good grief! I spell it out for you and it turns out you don't know what it means...instead you go into a pants-wetting® tirade screaming about you being so stupid and offended!
Since you failed to whine about this fake photo taken from the store's CC camera, I'll give you another chance.
(I suppose that by showing this series of photos of the store owner being bullied by a much larger assailant, this makes me a "racist" in your little mind)
Mr.B wrote:Since you failed to whine about this fake photo taken from the store's CC camera, I'll give you another chance.
No need, Klan-boy. I got it right the first time:
rstrong wrote:Nor was "Hands Up Don't Shoot" "fake news." It was inaccurate in the Michael Brown case, but given the many cases where it IS accurate, it was a reasonable assumption at the time.
Mr.B wrote:"Since you failed to whine about this fake photo taken from the store's CC camera, I'll give you another chance."
"No need, Klan-boy. I got it right the first time"
"Klan-boy"? I suppose it was the Klan that recorded the videos? Exposing the truth about a street-bully is Klan tactics?
Oh wait, I get it now...the fact that he was Black gave him license to run rough-shod over anyone who stood in the way of his getting what he wanted? No...YOU didn't get it the first time; and YOU still ain't got it.
What Klan-boy conveniently ignores is the years and years of now proven systemic racist policing in Ferguson that lit a spark over what was perhaps not the best incident to choose.
If you want to achieve greatness stop asking for permission.
1312. ETTD. 86 47.
Vrede too wrote:What Klan-boy conveniently ignores..."
Right on cue, as expected, Dumb and Dumber never fail to disappoint;
rstrong even taught Vrede a new phrase.
It's almost the middle of the month, Vrede, better dream up a new phrase-of-the-month on your own.
Vrede too wrote:What Klan-boy conveniently ignores is the years and years of now proven systemic racist policing in Ferguson that lit a spark over what was perhaps not the best incident to choose.
It's both hilarious and pathetic how perverted, testicle-obsessed Mr.B sticks with a meme after having made a complete ass of himself with it so many times before.
Vrede too wrote:Yep, not counting homerfobe, who is a worm by anyone's standards, ovine Mr.B never ever disagrees with a con. In contrast, rstrong and I spat all the time - nukes, protected speech, drugs, desolate , pipelines, shot cops (I partially backed up Mr.B on that one), sports, The Simpsons, tech, who to blame for Justin Bieber, etc. Mr.B is a pitifully projecting idiot, again.
If you want to achieve greatness stop asking for permission.
1312. ETTD. 86 47.
Vrede too wrote:"It's both hilarious and pathetic how perverted, testicle-obsessed ( ) Mr.B sticks with a meme after having made a complete ass of himself with it so many times before." "Testicle-obsessed" ... At least you can say I have the balls to "stick with" it..
Vrede too wrote:Yep, not counting homerfobe, who is a worm by anyone's standards, ovine Mr.B never ever disagrees with a con. In contrast, rstrong and I spat all the time - nukes, protected speech, drugs, desolate , pipelines, shot cops (I partially backed up Mr.B on that one), sports, The Simpsons, tech, who to blame for Justin Bieber, etc. Mr.B is a pitifully projecting idiot, again. Geeze, I'm really sorry Vrede...I didn't mean to hurt your feelings...
"A Cop texting And driving in Fergus Ont. and the news says the cop is trying to blame the bus driver for this and keep on Sharing this post and get it notice by lots."
I can't decide which is funnier; the photo or the commentary...
Mr.B wrote:"A Cop texting And driving in Fergus Ont. and the news says the cop is trying to blame the bus driver for this and keep on Sharing this post and get it notice by lots."
The bits about texting and the cop blaming the bus driver were made up by the internet. You might want to review the title of this thread.
The real incident happened two years ago. According to real news reporting, both vehicles were stopped. "The vehicle in front moved. The officer assumed that it was going to go forward. The vehicle stopped suddenly, and the officer struck the back of the vehicle."
, pipelines, 
