"Trump taps Callista Gingrich ..."
Oh my.

Not that I really care who the U.S. ambassador to the Vatican is, but it's hilarious that Trump is sending a home wrecking adulteress. If it gets Newt out of the country, too, it's a good thing.
Good. Leave your religion out of our schools, and we'll won't force science into your churches.
Let's just give the Saudi's a huge arms deal to arm them to the teeth, and then at the same time try to institute a "Muslim ban".
Vrede too wrote: ↑Thu May 18, 2017 11:24 amNo one here has ever complained about a possibly iffy case like this, crybaby, and no one sane swallows the Faux Noise version of events. For example, Faux Noise never mentions that the memorandum it links says, "This coaching memorandum is not considered disciplinary in nature and will not be included in your personnel file." Big whup. So, homerfobe has screwed up twice, again.
We had a more egregious case at my hospital last year. A doctor was asking all patients if he could pray with them early in his exam. There is nothing wrong with staff participating in patient-initiated prayer, but it's wholly inappropriate for someone in a position of so much power to put patients in the position of complying or worrying if they'd get substandard care if they refused. He was on a short term contract which was not renewed.
Dollah Akbar.bannination wrote: ↑Sun Jun 04, 2017 9:00 amLet's just give the Saudi's a huge arms deal to arm them to the teeth, and then at the same time try to institute a "Muslim ban".
![]()
Absolutely correct. In the name of Nobody. The Nobody that took the time to teach that person the meaning of respect for themselves or other peoples property or lives. The Nobodys that decided that discipline is not something to be taught in school. Examples:O Really wrote: Have you ever heard of anybody being beheaded, bombed, or hung on behalf of atheism?" He then made a motion similar to slitting a throat and shouted, "In the name of ... nobody!"
O Really wrote: ↑Sun Jun 04, 2017 11:44 amRastafarian Pastafarian wears colander and gets AZ driver's license. https://www.yahoo.com/news/guy-wears-co ... 51403.html ...
JTA wrote: ↑Sun Jun 04, 2017 2:09 pmIs it possible that that's more of a correlation though, and waning religious beliefs isn't necessaroly the cause of more "rebellious" youth and disrespectful shitty adults?
Seems like bad parenting is more to blame than anything.
Shit runs downhill. People act and react as to what they see and hear at home; or don't see and hear at home.
In addition to that, being surrounded by a bunch of shitty people increases the likelihood of you becoming shitty as well. They say a person is a mixture of their five best friends.
It's called peer pressure or the pack mentality. Going with the flow.
On the flip side, I guess can see how the fear of God could keep some people in line. We wouldn't need things like laws and threat of punishment by the state if all people were truly good. And laws have been around for millennia.
I don't think it's the fear of God as much as it is knowing Biblical directions for Godly living. Take the commandments for example.
Every commandment is being broken in today's society. Stealing, murdering, disrespecting parents, destroying other peoples property or wanting it for themselves, etc.
Truly good people don't need to be coerced to do good.
Proper training at home can hardly be called coercion; unless your referring to Mommy or Daddy telling a kid that they'll get a goody if they're a good little boy or girl.
Being good simply due to threat of divine punishment does not make a person good,
My earthly punishment was a hell of a lot scarier than thoughts of a divine punishment after I die. That's my point. These damn hand wringing, snot slinging, panty waisted, so-called psychologists and educators who whine about parental discipline should have their own asses kicked.
but for those with a penchant for violence, I agree that religion can be helpful in keeping some people in line, but it can also be used more nefariously (terrorism, etc.)
Again it's not religion that should be a total tool in teaching respect and discipline, common sense is the best tool. But as long as drugs, greed, and fuck the world attitudes abound, you can forget that.
No-one is arguing against teaching discipline or respect in schools. Schools still do that. We're against teaching a state religion in schools, but that's an entirely different thing.
All of these crimes were just as common in the great 1950s as they are now. More so, even. The great 1950s were a myth for everyone outside the new white middle-class suburbs.homerfobe wrote: ↑Sun Jun 04, 2017 1:23 pmExamples:
The young woman who stole knives at Walmart and then hacked a Uber driver to death.
The young woman who slapped a c-store clerk because the gas pump refused her credit card.
The trashy mouthed punks who stand up in a classroom and curse at or strike their teachers.
The degraded filth that parades their half naked bodies down the street in a parade in the name of perverted sex.
The fugged up judges who rule that filth and gutter attitudes are normal behavior and their words and actions, even in public view, are protected.
One more time:
Uh.... they do still teach religion classes, and it's perfectly acceptable to discuss it.homerfobe wrote: ↑Sun Jun 04, 2017 1:23 pm
I'm nothing when it comes to religion, but I've got enough damn brains to know that when religion was allowed to be discussed in a classroom and the students were taught the principles of religion, there was a hell of a lot more respect for other people. Since that O'Hare bitch, morals have gone to the frigging dogs. How many of you jumped up and cursed or punched your teacher, or your parents? Nobody?