Supsalemgr wrote:If you will reread my post I think one will see it was my feeling. If my lib friends don'r agree with it that is fine with me.
Rightwingers do not value facts.. .. when presented with facts they offer platitudes about everyone's opinion being valid and should be treated with respect.. That simply isn't true.. "Gut feelings" are not the same as facts..
The far right had their ass handed to them this election.. The days of anti-science, professing my religion with every breath rightwing nitwittery are numbered and if the GOP does not cull the knuckle-draqgers, we will be witness to even greater demonstrations of sanity from those not clinging to the right rail..
If many of the wingnuts didn't have a history of parroting whatever nonsense comes
down the pike, however nonsensical it is, there might be more forbearance for their
opinions, but since they don't there isn't. And if you think only liberals voted for Obama,
you're really way out there.
bannination wrote:
I disagree that "liberal factions believe that anything a conservative says, regardless of the source" is true. If some of the conservatives would post reputable sources for their information they might change peoples opinions about some things. In my opinion when some of the conservatives here are presented with factual information that disproves a particular assertion, they concede that thread and then bring up the same darn thing in another thread after it's been accepted as bonk. -- Remember how worn out Obama's birth certificate was? .. and how they didn't care a bit about Romney's?
Stinger is right, an opinion itself doesn't deserve any respect. When it's an unfounded opinion that clearly contradicts evidence, someone is probably going to be called an idiot. However, when you have an opinion based on at least some evidence, that's debate time and not name calling time.
Good post Bannination----except-----regardless what's posted, one or the other of the political factions is going to deem it as "bonk". Neither side believes that what one posts is from 'reputable sources'----the liberals call it wingnut sources, the conservatives just sit back laughing and let the moonbats rave! Let the cussin' begin!
Pretty much just more wingnut lies, spin, and lie-by-omission. SSDD.
Stinger wrote:If liberal dumb**ks run circles around you so that you can't even participate in a conversation, what does that make you? A dumbestf**k.
A dumbestf**k on an even keel with you.
Get back to me when you make an intelligent post that's actually about a topic. It appears that both here and on the defunct forum, you were just to chickens--t to do so.
When I first posted in the TN forum, it was you that couldn't even participate in a conversation;
Sorry, but your selective stupidity is letting you down bigtime. I participated in any number of conversations, backing my assertions up with verifiable, factual support from credible sources.
Funny that I've never seen you do that.
you jumped my ass accusing me of being another poster because I wrote on a subject that the other poster had written about earlier.
Yeah, dolt. Mister X made a big deal about the sheriff's armored vehicle some 4 months earlier. You went back through something like 40 pages of threads to find that particular thread and resurrect it, spouting the same noise Mister X had 4 months earlier.
Your story was something like, "Well, I just showed up on this forum and wondered, out of the clear blue sky, if anyone had discussed the idea of local sheriff's departments purchasing armored vehicles, so I did a search and . . . lo and behold, there was a thread about Henderson county purchasing an armored vehicle for the sheriff. I just couldn't believe my luck."
None of the rest of us believed it either.
Then there was the rather detailed knowledge you had of a forum troll from six months before you registered.
I can't remember the dumbass lie you tried to peddle on that one, but it didn't pass the sniff test either.
And now you whine about getting caught. Poor wittle Wyin' Weo.
Personally, I don't give a flyin' frig who cusses who, I just consider their mentality level and that, like you, their veins are coursing with pink Kool-Aid.
Kool Aid is that which doesn't make sense, has no factual support, and is easily discredited.
Since you've never been able to discredit a single thing I've posted, your asinine statement "like you, their veins are coursing with pink Kool-Aid" just shows how much of a chicken s--t you really are.
If you'd been man enough to prove even one thing I've said was Kool Aid, you might have some balls and some ground to stand on, but you continue to prove you have neither.
Your lame "conversations" don't interest me anyway.
I know. You prefer not to discuss anything. You just want to yap from the sidelines.
Stinger wrote:...None of the rest of us believed it either...
I had no opinion.
Exception noted.
What odds would you give on a poster disappearing, a new poster appearing, resurrecting a months' old thread -- a rather esoteric topic about a sheriff's armored vehicle -- and jumping right in where the poster who disappeared left off ... without any sort of coherent or rational explanation?
Not a definitive call, just a guess on the odds.
We won't get into the extensive knowledge of a six-months-old troll infestation for which there was also no coherent or rational explanation.
