People who aren't taking this very well.

Supsalemgr · Unread post by **Supsalemgr** » Sat Nov 10, 2012 5:23 pm

It is Saturday and party time in Oxford.

O Really · Unread post by **O Really** » Sat Nov 10, 2012 11:10 pm

I'm particularly happy that Obama's race had nothing to do with anybody voting against him.

We know this of course because of all those people who assured us that it was "his policies, not his race" that mattered to them, even though they couldn't explain any given policies or show how those policies differed from the last white guy in office. But maybe those people were, ummm..."mistaken." ... http://www.floatingsheep.org/2012/11/ma ... se-to.html

Stinger · Unread post by **Stinger** » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:49 pm

Add Fox News and Rich Noyes (NewsBusters, Media Research Center) with an article about "Five ways the mainstream media tipped the scales in favor of Obama

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/11/ ... z2BwupJXmi

Pretty much just more wingnut lies, spin, and lie-by-omission. SSDD.

He should have written the article about how Fox's chronic stream of lies fooled wingnuts into thinking Rmoney would win.

\V/ · Unread post by **\V/** » Mon Nov 12, 2012 7:49 am

I came across this video

I just had to share it~

neoplacebo · Unread post by **neoplacebo** » Mon Nov 12, 2012 11:56 am

Vrede wrote:
Leo Lyons wrote:...the U.S. is full of liberal dumb-f**ks led by a dumb-f**k...

There you have it; the voice of authority.

Apache · Unread post by **Apache** » Mon Nov 12, 2012 3:17 pm

Someone has started a petiton to have SC removed also. What is even funnier, most of the signatures are OUT OF STATE!!!!!

Stinger · Unread post by **Stinger** » Mon Nov 12, 2012 7:44 pm

Poor teenager didn't take it well. I feel sorry for her.

What she tweeted:

Some of her responses:

I wonder if she's closed her Twitter account.

rstrong · Unread post by **rstrong** » Tue Nov 13, 2012 11:32 am

Vrede wrote:Secession of the State of South Carolina

Love the bonus "Martial Law Any Second Now" wingnuttery.

billy.pilgrim · Tue Nov 13, 2012 11:58 am

rstrong wrote:
Vrede wrote:Secession of the State of South Carolina
Love the bonus "Martial Law Any Second Now" wingnuttery.

clemond is having a little trouble with his petition

it was started on 2/27/2009

1 Mr. Clemond Griffin II Moncks Corner South Carolina USA View
Feb 27, 2009

do any y'all know this goober

back to the story - started on 2/27/2009 and as of 11/13/2012 he has added another 115 signitures - here are 114, 115 and 116

116 N/G kilgore moron idiot street N/G USA View
Nov 13, 2012

115 Dr. Bogdan Gheorghiu Spartanburg SC USA N/G Nov 13, 2012

114 ms heda van deventer MYRTLE BEACH SOUTH CAROLINA USA View
Nov 13, 2012

Dr. Bogdan????

billy.pilgrim · Tue Nov 13, 2012 12:00 pm

but honestly, wouldn't it be a good idea to let them have their own country?

bannination · Unread post by **bannination** » Tue Nov 13, 2012 8:16 pm

billy.pilgrim wrote:but honestly, wouldn't it be a good idea to let them have their own country?

Probably not, once they realize they can't make it on their own (red state moochers) we'll enviably go to war with them. Could you imagine a bunch of starving religious racists with no power but an arsenal of nuclear weapons?

Middle east comes to mind...

billy.pilgrim · Tue Nov 13, 2012 9:04 pm

bannination wrote:
billy.pilgrim wrote:but honestly, wouldn't it be a good idea to let them have their own country?
Probably not, once they realize they can't make it on their own (red state moochers) we'll enviably go to war with them. Could you imagine a bunch of starving religious racists with no power but an arsenal of nuclear weapons?

Middle east comes to mind...

agreed, probably a bad idea

Supsalemgr · Unread post by **Supsalemgr** » Wed Nov 14, 2012 6:26 am

We all know this secession stuff is all nonsense. However, since the libs have weighed in I might as well suggest an alternative observation. Let's say SC, or any other state does secede. Then they rewrite Welfare laws that basically make people give 40 hours a week for any benefits. I suggest there would be a mass immigration to those states that do not require it. I wonder if libs would then enforce "their borders"?

bannination · Unread post by **bannination** » Wed Nov 14, 2012 6:34 am

Supsalemgr wrote:We all know this secession stuff is all nonsense. However, since the libs have weighed in I might as well suggest an alternative observation. Let's say SC, or any other state does secede. Then they rewrite Welfare laws that basically make people give 40 hours a week for any benefits. I suggest there would be a mass immigration to those states that do not require it. I wonder if libs would then enforce "their borders"?

That was my point, we'd eventually go to war because the red state takers would be trying to take from a productive society. Protecting borders is obvious.

You take care of your own, we take care of our own.

Supsalemgr · Unread post by **Supsalemgr** » Wed Nov 14, 2012 7:11 am

So they would turn their back on the exact people who put them in office?

billy.pilgrim · Wed Nov 14, 2012 9:26 am

Supsalemgr wrote:So they would turn their back on the exact people who put them in office?

that comprehension thingie still eludes the forum tag-along

Leo Lyons · Unread post by **Leo Lyons** » Wed Nov 14, 2012 9:31 am

Re: People who aren't taking this very well.

Just wait until 2013 comes around. We'll see who, on what side of the fence, ain't taking what so well.

Something about a 'fiscal cliff' comes to mind.

2014's gonna be a bitch; you know, that Obamacare thingy.

rstrong · Unread post by **rstrong** » Wed Nov 14, 2012 9:56 am

Leo Lyons wrote:2014's gonna be a bitch; you know, that Obamacare thingy.

ObamaCare is settled. With more benefits kicking in in 2014, it'll only be good for the Democrats.

O Really · Unread post by **O Really** » Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:18 am

Vrede wrote:
Leo Lyons wrote:Re: People who aren't taking this very well.

Just wait until 2013 comes around. We'll see who, on what side of the fence, ain't taking what so well.

Something about a 'fiscal cliff' comes to mind...
Given the election and exit poll results, my guess is that the GOP will either compromise drastically on tax cuts for the rich or take the lion's share of the heat for not doing so. If rightwing extemist Ryan gets his way it will be the latter:
Ryan: No Mandate for Obama in Election

But, there are voices of political wisdom and fiscal sanity:
5 Republicans who think the GOP should stop coddling the rich

I'll also guess that any deficit reduction will be limited by sucking up to the Pentagon.

Yeah, and a poll out yesterday said that if they don't reach agreement and go over the cliff, 60% will blame the GOP vs. 29% blaming Obama.

O Really · Unread post by **O Really** » Wed Nov 14, 2012 3:13 pm

This guy definitely didn't take it well.. http://www.wptv.com/dpp/news/political/ ... ls-himself

Slow business for a tanning salon in Key West. Imagine that.