New Jobless numbers and more BLAME

[Colonel Taylor]

Initial claims for state unemployment benefits rose 78,000 to a seasonally adjusted 439,000
Wages down, jobless claims up, Stock market going down Go ahead and Spin away.
One question though has any Lib or Dem ever been responsible for anything or is every problem in the world just BLAME a Con? Just wondering before the twisting starts.

[Supsalemgr]

It is obviously just a coinicidence.

[O Really]

Only the Colonel (and of course the late Mdispo), could take an article entitled "Sandy Spurs Jump in Jobless Claims; Inflation Nudges Up" and turn it into a post on "lib" irresponsibility and blame.

[Colonel Taylor]

There are no Dems quoted in the article, BLAMING or otherwise, and we did have a devastating hurricane that Colonel Taylor is still apparently unaware of. The "fiscal cliff" is mentioned, but everyone better informed than Colonel Taylor knows that it's the result of a bipartisan agreement.

Well at least vred thru the Blame in there anyway. Ummm the article BLAMES the Hurricane, now you believe that's the reason for the stock market going down and the wages being lower. You just believe that.

Yep, as usual, Colonel Taylor is doing all the BLAMING and TWISTING here.

Just like when he didn't understand his own link, BLAMED Obama for taking "a stab at Romney", then ran away like a little baby without so much as an "Opps" when his own link proved him wrong - If Franken-storm Sandy disrupts voting, what then?

That was explained the guy recanted afterwards and of course true or not the guy was going to deny it. I said he should be charged with some kind of a crime for accusing/lying.

Just like when he didn't understand his own link, BLAMED everyone from a "liberal guvmit TV station" to "liberals", "fellow lib", Kevin Clash, the article, Crock Hunter and me, then ran away like a little baby without so much as an "Opps" when he was proven wrong - Say it ain't so Elmo

It's a pattern.

[neoplacebo]

No doubt about it; a sure fire coincidence. All those businesses flooded / damaged / destroyed, leaving all the people who worked at them without a job to go to. This is probably why the jobless numbers rose as they did. It could be because of the storm damage or it could be due to some sort of foul magic and flat out trickery and maybe a little treachery thrown in as well. I myself will just go ahead and BLAME Jersey governor Christie and TWIST the facts to show that the foul storm Sandy was caused by Christie falling off a pier in Jersey, thus creating a giant pseudo tsunami that inverted on itself and inundated the coastal areas from Jersey down to Maryland. That damn Christie. I blame him and twist to suit. Ok?

[O Really]

It is obviously just a coinicidence.

I had a coin incidence once at the fountain at the Met.

[neoplacebo]

I just this morning had an exact nine coin incident at the post office when I had to buy two stamps. They demanded nine coin incidents on the spot for those government documents. I was lucky to not be arrested in yet another unfortunate coin incidence.

[neoplacebo]

It's less than cheap; it's free.

[Colonel Taylor]

Well at least vred thru the Blame in there anyway.

Forget your own thread title already?

Ummm the article BLAMES the Hurricane,

That you disagree is what makes your post so funny. The article also talks about the steady economic improvement prior to Sandy. Didn't you notice?

now you believe that's the reason for the stock market going down

As I said, the article also mentions the "fiscal cliff', a bipartisan creation. Didn't you notice?

and the wages being lower.

The article doesn't mention wages going up or down. I love how when you post stupid and get caught you double down by just making things up.

You just believe that.

You just believe that this article has anything at all to do with partisan BLAME shifting. That's how you are.

That was explained

Yep, you BLAME someone else, as you always do.

the guy recanted afterwards

Your own thread-starting article said that the accusation had been investigated and found to be without foundation. That did not stop you from saying flat out that he had sex with a 16 year old.

and of course true or not the guy was going to deny it.

True or not, your own article's refutation or not, you chose to believe that the accuser was being honest.

I said he should be charged with some kind of a crime for accusing/lying.

So what? You ignored your own article, you made the false accusation, you accused us of supporting pedophilia just because we were more cautious, you screwed up a bunch more facts, you BLAMED the article for all your flubs, then you ran away without so much as an admission of error, apology to all those you smeared, or even an "Opps."

Don't worry too much about it. We all know that you have no common sense or personal responsibility. It's just cheap entertainment to point it out over and over and over again.

Yes it is cheap and entertaining the way you Twist things, get a life will ya!

[Bungalow Bill]

That why you've got to love the nutjobs. They start a thread about new jobless numbers
and never bother to mention that the headline of their own link names Sandy as the chief
reason. Winguts=Hilarious.

[Colonel Taylor]

That why you've got to love the nutjobs. They start a thread about new jobless numbers
and never bother to mention that the headline of their own link names Sandy as the chief
reason. Winguts=Hilarious.

At least you figured it out anyway. BLAME is right in the title. Others are still chasing their tail.

[Stinger]

, get a life will ya!

Translation from Mangle-ish to English -- "I lost another one, but this is my attempt to play it off and fool everyone. Pretty good, huh?"

Not really. Fooled no one.

Grow a brain, will ya?

[O Really]

OK, I understand during the last four years, there is some logic in Republicans hoping nothing will get better and Obama will get blamed and run out on a rail. Fine. They tried it, it didn't work. It would seem that now, however, would be a good time to get off that self-destructive track since he can't be elected again. What now - do you guys wish things deteriorate for the next four years in hopes of reducing the Dems chances of getting somebody else elected? Can you simply not stand the thought that if things get better - no matter from what cause - that Obama might get some credit?

You had your chance, and you gave it your best shot to trash all things Obama for four years. McConnell's "The single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president" was an abject failure. Isn't having a lame duck President an opportunity to lighten up a bit? Rhetorical question, nevermind.

[Colonel Taylor]

OK, I understand during the last four years, there is some logic in Republicans hoping nothing will get better and Obama will get blamed and run out on a rail. Fine. They tried it, it didn't work. It would seem that now, however, would be a good time to get off that self-destructive track since he can't be elected again. What now - do you guys wish things deteriorate for the next four years in hopes of reducing the Dems chances of getting somebody else elected? Can you simply not stand the thought that if things get better - no matter from what cause - that Obama might get some credit?

You had your chance, and you gave it your best shot to trash all things Obama for four years. McConnell's "The single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president" was an abject failure. Isn't having a lame duck President an opportunity to lighten up a bit? Rhetorical question, nevermind.

So I figure you are Ok then with the Blame everything on everybody else scenario for four more years ha?

[O Really]

So I figure you are Ok then with the Blame everything on everybody else scenario for four more years ha?

I'm more into finding causes and solutions. If that comes across to you as "BLAME" fine. It wouldn't be the first bone you've chewed long after the meat was gone.

[Colonel Taylor]

So I figure you are Ok then with the Blame everything on everybody else scenario for four more years ha?

I'm more into finding causes and solutions. If that comes across to you as "BLAME" fine. It wouldn't be the first bone you've chewed long after the meat was gone.

So are denying that Obama has BLAMED everything from the economy to his wife's hemorrhoids on someone else? You can't be serious can you. Spin away.

[Colonel Taylor]

If I recall NY,NJ and Conn new unemployment filings for the week were around 6500. How do you account for the other 71,500? Oh and many states have mention due to power outages many haven't been able to file claims the last few weeks.
You don't think it has anything to do with the Obamacare or a slowing economy do ya? Drink up now!
So spin spin spin. Da twisting pole!

[Colonel Taylor]

...Just like when he didn't understand his own link, BLAMED everyone from a "liberal guvmit TV station" to "liberals", "fellow lib", Kevin Clash, the article, Crock Hunter and me, then ran away like a little baby without so much as an "Opps" when he was proven wrong - Say it ain't so Elmo

It's a pattern.

Mirror, Colonel Taylor. Clean up your own act, then we won't laugh at you for whining about BLAMING . . . Well, we still will when the BLAME, like with the Shrubcession, is warranted and the vast majority of Americans see it the same way. In those instances it's just you trying to inaccurately BLAME Obama. Mirror again.

Bla bla bla it's all Georgie's fault that all we have.

[O Really]

You don't think it has anything to do with the Obamacare or a economy do ya? !

No, I haven't seen anything to show that might be the case. No numbers showing a slowing economy. And nothing about Obamacare changed from November 1 to November 15. But if you've got an article or some credible reference that links the employment issues in your article with slowing economy or Obamacare, I'll be happy to read it.

[Colonel Taylor]

...Just like when he didn't understand his own link, BLAMED everyone from a "liberal guvmit TV station" to "liberals", "fellow lib", Kevin Clash, the article, Crock Hunter and me, then ran away like a little baby without so much as an "Opps" when he was proven wrong - Say it ain't so Elmo

It's a pattern.

Mirror, Colonel Taylor. Clean up your own act, then we won't laugh at you for whining about BLAMING . . . Well, we still will when the BLAME, like with the Shrubcession, is warranted and the vast majority of Americans see it the same way. In those instances it's just you trying to inaccurately BLAME Obama. Mirror again.

Bla bla bla it's all Georgie's fault that all we have.

Yeah, I was pretty sure Colonel Taylor would not be able to explain himself, take responsibility for his own actions, admit the truth about the Shrubcession, end his hypocrisy or otherwise respond in an informed, mature or intelligent manner.

That's why we like him, he's the epitome of an unthinking, unaccountable Faux Noise puppet.

Figures vred wouldn't have the guts to admit Obama has been in charge for four years and is still BLAMING others for everything wrong in his life.