With a few spelling errors to boot.....

http://m.newsok.com/ten-commandments-mo ... le/3728824
What's stupid about commanding not to steal, kill, screw your neighbor's wife (or daughter), honoring your parents, etc?bannination wrote:I always wonder why they stop at ten, I mean the first ten are pretty stupid, but the good stuff starts later!
You miss the point:homerfobe wrote:What's stupid about commanding not to steal, kill, screw your neighbor's wife (or daughter), honoring your parents, etc?bannination wrote:I always wonder why they stop at ten, I mean the first ten are pretty stupid, but the good stuff starts later!
I've always heard that they were called the Ten Commandments, not the Ten Suggestions, although neither title means anything nowadays; people's scruples have gone to hell. Don't believe me; read your quote.
That's logical, I'm screwed because my great great grandparents did something to offend the almighty.visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children to the third and fourth generations of those who hate
Agreed 100 percent, O Really.O Really wrote:I don't know why these people keep stepping on their own dicks on this issue. The ten commandments aren't a bad guide on how to live your life, but have a decidedly religious meaning as usually presented. No reason OK City can't allow private individuals to put up monuments on its property - but what else have they allowed? Nothing wrong with putting up statues, icons, signs, etc. representing various religions in the area, but putting up only one? Seriously?
Simple rule: if you allow one religious statue, you have to allow one from anybody else who wants one. If you let one private individual put up a ten commandments statue, you have to allow other private individuals to put up statues that might contain pentagrams or stars and crescents.
In what alternate universe is it not more reasonable for the city to just stay out of the religion business than to deal with having to let the Church of Body Modification put up a statue of Pinhead on your lawn?
Interesting point, Banni.bannination wrote:Even the first commandment has god admitting there are other gods and you are not to worship them. :-)
Your ass is grass, and God's name just might be John Deere.bannination wrote:That's logical, I'm screwed because my great great grandparents did something to offend the almighty.
Not that I'm a religious scholar, but that's about the most asinine statement I've ever heard. Catholic doctrine?mike wrote:If you're not a believer, you should, still, have nothing to worry about.
Your inaccurate disparagement aside, Leo, do you believe it is reasonable that a non-believer would imagine anything in the Bible would pertain to them personally?Leo Lyons wrote:Not that I'm a religious scholar, but that's about the most asinine statement I've ever heard. Catholic doctrine?mike wrote:If you're not a believer, you should, still, have nothing to worry about.
Yet more disparagement, eh, Leo? Is that all you got?Leo Lyons wrote: I suppose he could go hide behind a curtain and confess his waywardness to a man in a dress who might not have washed his hands after the encounter with the altar boy...
Oh no, there's plenty more. I won't waste it here though.mike wrote: Yet more disparagement, eh, Leo? Is that all you got?![]()