Presidents* Trump & Putin bromance

[1 CAT FAN]

Has any of these allegations removed your President from the Oval Office. Six more years of whining to come.

We don't know yet, do we, since there hasn't been a presidential election since Trump snuck in. We'll see. As to impeachment, undoubtedly any other past President (no asterisks) would have been run out on a rail for pretty much any one of the hundreds of things Trump's done. But none of those people would have left Pence in office, either. If it's a choice of politics or ethics, most everybody elected will take politics

In other words, all the whining with allegations has changed nothing, Trump remains your President.

[Vrede too]

Barr, Rosenstein, Mueller, Senate Repugs, all of our intel agencies and even Pence ALL agree: You POSPOTUS fanboys were and still are useful idiots for Russia. However, you will never admit it. If you had the smarts and spines for that, you never would have become Trumpettes.

[1 CAT FAN]

On to the next allegation, Trump haters will be whining for the next 6 years.

[O Really]

[

In other words, all the whining with allegations has changed nothing, Trump remains your President.
[/quote]

Sure as of today, Trump is still President*
But if you really think all the whining, allegations, accusations, evidence, investigations, reports and general kerfuffle doesn't matter, you're not really much of a student of politics or of people.

[1 CAT FAN]

If you mean liberals, yeah, I enjoy seeing them have temper tantrums as well as whatever you fellas call yourselves. Whine on with the next allegation.

[O Really]

If you mean liberals, yeah, I enjoy seeing them have temper tantrums as well as whatever you fellas call yourselves. Whine on with the next allegation.

You have any idea how many of your posts are just generic taunting? Whether it's sports, politics, religion, whatever, you post only taunts. Why don't you occasionally pick something you'd like to talk about and maybe you would get better responses and less ridicule.

[1 CAT FAN]

If you mean liberals, yeah, I enjoy seeing them have temper tantrums as well as whatever you fellas call yourselves. Whine on with the next allegation.

You have any idea how many of your posts are just generic taunting? Whether it's sports, politics, religion, whatever, you post only taunts. Why don't you occasionally pick something you'd like to talk about and maybe you would get better responses and less ridicule.

Not one profanity slur, I applaud you, O Really. Generic taunts?

Skiping school in the name of climate change is.

What excuse did you use for "skiping" spelling class?
And what cause would you find worthy of skipping class?

[Vrede too]

You have any idea how many of your posts are just generic taunting? Whether it's sports, politics, religion, whatever, you post only taunts. Why don't you occasionally pick something you'd like to talk about and maybe you would get better responses and less ridicule.

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=2078&p=93914&hilit=nyuh#p93914

... Awww, if you can't actually dispute a single thing, a desperate and incorrect straw man along with childishly posting, "Nyuh-uh," just further humiliates yourself. Bless your heart.

Honestly, you're going to have to be way, way more sophisticated if you hope to have any impact here at all. Try, ummm, things like facts, logic and credible sourcing. We're not one of your low rent rightwing echo chambers. Stupid cartoons, dishonest galleries and, "You watch CNN, nyah, nyah, nyah," won't cut it. Unless, of course, your masochistic (nttawwt) goal is to be an object of derision and pity - in that case, carry on.

Be careful or he may play the Benghazi Benghazi Benghazi card, or the Vince Foster card, or the birth certificate card or any other of the hundreds they share. Don't forget - FDR's New Deal caused the Great Depression and Fox is an honest news source.

There was another similar recent post by someone other than me, but I can't remember what synonym for taunting/nyah, nyah, nyah was used. I don't think that 1 FAT CAN has the capacity for intelligent discussion. Any time s/he tries, the logic or factual fail is immediate and it devolves into s/he cowering from the flub. So, all we're ever gonna get is a lame, parroting impression of Rush Hannity.

[billy.pilgrim]

They just enjoy the continuous whining.

Where do you fall?

Do you agree with a candidate who uses the top secret confidential briefing candidates get from a sitting president to conspire with a brutal foreign dictator in order to win an election?


Or, more likely, you don't know any more about these atrocities that cost so many tens of thousands of American lives than what you read (or skimmed) in this thread.

Have I missed your answer?

[O Really]

They just enjoy the continuous whining.

Where do you fall?

Do you agree with a candidate who uses the top secret confidential briefing candidates get from a sitting president to conspire with a brutal foreign dictator in order to win an election?


Or, more likely, you don't know any more about these atrocities that cost so many tens of thousands of American lives than what you read (or skimmed) in this thread.

Have I missed your answer?

I'm sure there was a knowledgeable, well-phrased response somewhere. Maybe the dingo ate his answer. In the meantime, it more like is something like, "Why do you hate Clemson, nyah, nyah, nyah, snowflake?

[1 CAT FAN]

I don't think that 1 FAT CAN has the capacity for intelligent discussion. Any time s/he tries, the logic or factual fail is immediate and it devolves into s/he cowering from the flub. So, all we're ever gonna get is a lame, parroting impression of Rush Hannity.

What political party did you say that you support again?

[Vrede too]

Hundreds of former prosecutors say evidence against Trump supports charges

If Donald Trump weren’t president of the United States, he would have been charged with obstruction of justice, over 400 former federal prosecutors and Justice Department officials said Monday in an extraordinary public letter.

The joint statement, which had 417 signers by early afternoon, rebuts Attorney General William Barr’s assertion that the evidence of potential obstruction uncovered by special counsel Robert Mueller was “not sufficient” to establish that Trump committed a crime.

“Each of us believes that the conduct of President Trump described in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report would, in the case of any other person not covered by the Office of Legal Counsel policy against indicting a sitting President, result in multiple felony charges for obstruction of justice,” the statement reads.

It was signed by, among others, Bill Weld, a former U.S. attorney and Massachusetts governor who is running against Trump for the 2020 Republican nomination; John Martin Sr., a former U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York; and Paul Rosenzweig, senior counsel to independent counsel Kenneth Starr, who led the investigation that led to the impeachment of President Bill Clinton....

[1 CAT FAN]

Have I missed your answer?

Idk, billy.pilgrim it's possible that you were preoccupied.

[1 CAT FAN]

Hundreds of former prosecutors say evidence against Trump supports charges

If Donald Trump weren’t president of the United States, he would have been charged with obstruction of justice, over 400 former federal prosecutors and Justice Department officials said Monday in an extraordinary public letter.

The joint statement, which had 417 signers by early afternoon, rebuts Attorney General William Barr’s assertion that the evidence of potential obstruction uncovered by special counsel Robert Mueller was “not sufficient” to establish that Trump committed a crime.

“Each of us believes that the conduct of President Trump described in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report would, in the case of any other person not covered by the Office of Legal Counsel policy against indicting a sitting President, result in multiple felony charges for obstruction of justice,” the statement reads.

It was signed by, among others, Bill Weld, a former U.S. attorney and Massachusetts governor who is running against Trump for the 2020 Republican nomination; John Martin Sr., a former U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York; and Paul Rosenzweig, senior counsel to independent counsel Kenneth Starr, who led the investigation that led to the impeachment of President Bill Clinton....

Bill Weld, a former U.S. attorney and Massachusetts governor who is running against Trump for the 2020 Republican nomination. What political party did you say you support?

[1 CAT FAN]

‘Game over’

"Democrats want to keep searching for imaginary evidence that supports their claims, but it is simply not there," House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) said in a statement. The House's No. 2 Republican, Rep. Steve Scalise (R-La.), added that Democrats "ought to apologize to the American people."

Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.), a key Trump ally on Capitol Hill, added in an interview that the lack of charges from Mueller's team should put an abrupt end to Democratic investigations on Capitol Hill.

“Prosecutors have one job, and that’s to prosecute and indict,” Meadows said.. “And if Bob Mueller in two-and-a-half years of investigation — which includes both the FBI and special prosecutor’s time — doesn’t bring charges, I don’t know how much longer we need to be talking about collusion and obstruction.” https://www.politico.com/story/2019/04/ ... se-1281024

[Vrede too]

U.S. Treasury's Mnuchin refuses to release Trump's tax returns to Congress

Clearly illegal. What's being hidden:
45SHOLE has been lying about his wealth;
45SHOLE legally yet unpatriotically dodges every tax he can and pays a far lower rate than the average American;
How beholden 45SHOLE is to Putin, the Saudis and other unsavory actors.

Mnuchin has a difficult job competing with Alexander Acosta, Barr, David L. Bernhardt, Bolton, Jim Bridenstine, Carson, DeVos, Gina Haspel, Thomas Homan, Kathy Kraninger, Kevin McAleenan, Mick Mulvaney, Ajit Pai, Perry, Pompeo, Wilbur Ross and Andrew R. Wheeler for WORST agency head.

[Boatrocker]

Bottom line:
If there was anyfucking thing in that report to "exonerate" dumb donald, validate any rethuglikkklan talking points or embarrass democrats, the goddam thing would be on 5000 billboards across the interstate highway system, published in its entirety in any and every paper willing to print it and handed out like business cards by donald frederickovich, who would be autographing them like they were bibles.

[Vrede too]

We knew that it was coming, the constitutional crisis is now here.

Trump invokes executive privilege on full Mueller report as Democrats vote to hold Attorney General Bill Barr in contempt

For better or worse 45SHOLE is forcing the House to begin impeachment proceedings.

[Vrede too]

As I just said:

House Speaker Pelosi: Trump making impeachment case by ignoring subpoenas

So, is he being stupid, does he see a gain by impeachment and the nearly inevitable failure to convict by the Senate, or does he not care either way because of the Senate so he'll just do what he feels like?

[neoplacebo]

As I just said:

House Speaker Pelosi: Trump making impeachment case by ignoring subpoenas

So, is he being stupid, does he see a gain by impeachment and the nearly inevitable failure to convict by the Senate, or does he not care either way because of the Senate so he'll just do what he feels like?

My guess is that Bitch McConnell has told him not to worry about it. I would love to see McConnell's face, though, if all of a sudden all the GOP Senators got an ethical epiphany and voted to shitcan trump. McConnell would likely drop dead right there on the Senate floor. Two for the price of one as it were. Former TN Senator Bob Corker recognized trump for what he was, but Marsha Blackburn took his place so it's a net zero.