Nah. Just whinin' about a "little snot"; or a big slimey booger. You choose.
(p.s. you're not fooling anyone, you read it.


neoplacebo wrote: ↑Tue Apr 16, 2019 11:16 amIn my post about the 1950's US activity in Afghanistan I said it was in the 1950's.
The principles of dam construction and irrigation systems is fundamentally the same as it was centuries ago; materials science has changed, along with methods of construction but irrigation is still moving water from one place to another, usually in a confined channel. Yes, I know the Morrison Knudsen Company history.
neoplacebo wrote: ↑Tue Apr 16, 2019 9:25 pmwater dissolving and water removing there is water at the bottom of the ocean under the water, carry the water remove the water at the bottom of the ocean letting the days go by, let the water hold me down letting the days go by, water flowing underground
into the blue again after the money's gone once in a lifetime water flowing underground and you may ask yourself what is that beautiful house? and you may ask yourself where does that highway go to? and you may ask yourself am I right? am I wrong? and you may say to yourself "my god what have I done?" same as it ever was same as it ever washttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IsSpAOD6K8
You seem to be asserting that there is a contiguous water table at various depths covering the entire planet. Draw yourself a flat map of the world and show your water table at whatever depths you choose; just make it a contiguous ribbon of water that appears at varying depths everywhere on the planet. Now realize if this were true, everything above that water table would spin off into space because there would be nothing anchoring any of the land to the planet itself.1 CAT FAN wrote: ↑Tue Apr 16, 2019 8:15 pmWe'll allow the identity of that someone, that got ran over by a bus, to continue to be unknown. That someone who posted the original article, may be along shortly cursing in pain.
neoplacebo wrote: ↑Tue Apr 16, 2019 11:16 amIn my post about the 1950's US activity in Afghanistan I said it was in the 1950's.
The principles of dam construction and irrigation systems is fundamentally the same as it was centuries ago; materials science has changed, along with methods of construction but irrigation is still moving water from one place to another, usually in a confined channel. Yes, I know the Morrison Knudsen Company history.The fundamentals of dams may be the same, but the advancement of drill technology, and proceeding deeper has steadily increased. They only had a mud rotary drill in the 1950's. With modern advancements in drilling technology, drilling deeper is limitless.
‘NO SERIOUS ATTENTION’
People who can afford it usually dig a well rather than depending on the city’s limited water system, but they are having to go ever deeper to reach the receding water.https://www.reuters.com/article/us-afgh ... SKBN1670FO
So, there's water underneath Afghanistan too. They just have to go deeper to get to it.
Yeah, looks like the military historians would have come out twenty years ago and said to the Generals and Admirals "man, I wouldn't do that shit if I was you" and pointed out that every entry into that place from Alexander the Great on down has met failure.Vrede too wrote: ↑Sun Oct 06, 2019 11:03 amAnger grows at civilian deaths by US, Afghan forces
This is George Orwell’s perpetual war.
How much money wasted?
Chelsea Manning is a hero.
We are still war criminals in Afghanistan.
Kids will soon be going there to kill and die that weren’t yet born when 9/11 happened.
It is and always will be “The Graveyard of Empires”.
Oh, they did - and were summarily ignored.neoplacebo wrote: ↑Sun Oct 06, 2019 11:20 am
Yeah, looks like the military historians would have come out twenty years ago and said to the Generals and Admirals "man, I wouldn't do that shit if I was you" and pointed out that every entry into that place from Alexander the Great on down has met failure.
To be fair, I did not spend much time worrying about our invasion. I thought that it wouldn't end well, but knew that it was inevitable after 9/11 and suspect that our real POTUS, Al Gore, would have done something similar. Otoh, I think the Iraq distraction and Afghan occupation were and are catastrophes.O Really wrote: ↑Sun Oct 06, 2019 11:30 amOh, they did - and were summarily ignored.neoplacebo wrote: ↑Sun Oct 06, 2019 11:20 amYeah, looks like the military historians would have come out twenty years ago and said to the Generals and Admirals "man, I wouldn't do that shit if I was you" and pointed out that every entry into that place from Alexander the Great on down has met failure.
Always wondered if Gore would have ignored the intelligence warnings like Shrub.Vrede too wrote: ↑Sun Oct 06, 2019 11:36 amTo be fair, I did not spend much time worrying about our invasion. I thought that it wouldn't end well, but knew that it was inevitable after 9/11 and suspect that our real POTUS, Al Gore, would have done something similar. Otoh, I think the Iraq distraction and Afghan occupation were and are catastrophes.O Really wrote: ↑Sun Oct 06, 2019 11:30 amOh, they did - and were summarily ignored.neoplacebo wrote: ↑Sun Oct 06, 2019 11:20 amYeah, looks like the military historians would have come out twenty years ago and said to the Generals and Admirals "man, I wouldn't do that shit if I was you" and pointed out that every entry into that place from Alexander the Great on down has met failure.
I always like to imagine that Gore would have been able to tell the difference between Afghanistan and Al-Qaeda and sent in a couple hundred special ops to deal with the major players.GoCubsGo wrote: ↑Sun Oct 06, 2019 1:56 pmAlways wondered if Gore would have ignored the intelligence warnings like Shrub.Vrede too wrote: ↑Sun Oct 06, 2019 11:36 amTo be fair, I did not spend much time worrying about our invasion. I thought that it wouldn't end well, but knew that it was inevitable after 9/11 and suspect that our real POTUS, Al Gore, would have done something similar. Otoh, I think the Iraq distraction and Afghan occupation were and are catastrophes.O Really wrote: ↑Sun Oct 06, 2019 11:30 amOh, they did - and were summarily ignored.neoplacebo wrote: ↑Sun Oct 06, 2019 11:20 amYeah, looks like the military historians would have come out twenty years ago and said to the Generals and Admirals "man, I wouldn't do that shit if I was you" and pointed out that every entry into that place from Alexander the Great on down has met failure.
That too.billy.pilgrim wrote: ↑Sun Oct 06, 2019 4:33 pmI always like to imagine that Gore would have been able to tell the difference between Afghanistan and Al-Qaeda and sent in a couple hundred special ops to deal with the major players.GoCubsGo wrote: ↑Sun Oct 06, 2019 1:56 pmAlways wondered if Gore would have ignored the intelligence warnings like Shrub.Vrede too wrote: ↑Sun Oct 06, 2019 11:36 amTo be fair, I did not spend much time worrying about our invasion. I thought that it wouldn't end well, but knew that it was inevitable after 9/11 and suspect that our real POTUS, Al Gore, would have done something similar. Otoh, I think the Iraq distraction and Afghan occupation were and are catastrophes.O Really wrote: ↑Sun Oct 06, 2019 11:30 amOh, they did - and were summarily ignored.neoplacebo wrote: ↑Sun Oct 06, 2019 11:20 amYeah, looks like the military historians would have come out twenty years ago and said to the Generals and Admirals "man, I wouldn't do that shit if I was you" and pointed out that every entry into that place from Alexander the Great on down has met failure.