Boatrocker wrote:Ted Nugent Doubles Down On Claim He Will Be "Dead Or In Jail" Because Of Gun Laws
Tick tock, Nugent, you asshole. Now, either go to jail or eat a bullet; show us your word is worth diddly-shit.

Start the countdown!
Boatrocker wrote:Ted Nugent Doubles Down On Claim He Will Be "Dead Or In Jail" Because Of Gun Laws
Tick tock, Nugent, you asshole. Now, either go to jail or eat a bullet; show us your word is worth diddly-shit.
No doubt. But that's not under control of the school, is it?Stinger wrote:I think Bill Maher's an ass who goes way to far, but he gets this one dead on.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b3vPkFhtGGI
The number one predictor of academic success is parental involvement.
No, it's not under control of anyone, so the simple-minded continue to hunt for simple solutions to highly-complex problems ... with expected results. I've heard a number of talking heads talk about issues like teacher quality, but the most important variable -- student quality -- is never mentioned.O Really wrote:No doubt. But that's not under control of the school, is it?Stinger wrote:I think Bill Maher's an ass who goes way to far, but he gets this one dead on.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b3vPkFhtGGI
The number one predictor of academic success is parental involvement.
Well said, but here's my beef. Everybody with a brain cell can see the contributing factors. But nobody in charge wants to address any issue that actually matters. So if the situation is that lack of parental involvement, or lack of parental education, produces students already behind by pre-K, then the question is, what do we do about that - not what do we do about an imaginary situation where all students begin equally.Stinger wrote:No, it's not under control of anyone, so the simple-minded continue to hunt for simple solutions to highly-complex problems ... with expected results. I've heard a number of talking heads talk about issues like teacher quality, but the most important variable -- student quality -- is never mentioned.O Really wrote:No doubt. But that's not under control of the school, is it?Stinger wrote:I think Bill Maher's an ass who goes way to far, but he gets this one dead on.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b3vPkFhtGGI
The number one predictor of academic success is parental involvement.
Just blame it on the teachers.
More and more research coming up to show that pre-K is too late to address the vocabulary gap. It's there by 4 and will stay there, apparently.
If everyone with a brain cell can see that, then no one with a brain cell is working on education reform because no one is talking about it.O Really wrote:Well said, but here's my beef. Everybody with a brain cell can see the contributing factors. But nobody in charge wants to address any issue that actually matters. So if the situation is that lack of parental involvement, or lack of parental education, produces students already behind by pre-K, then the question is, what do we do about that - not what do we do about an imaginary situation where all students begin equally.Stinger wrote:No, it's not under control of anyone, so the simple-minded continue to hunt for simple solutions to highly-complex problems ... with expected results. I've heard a number of talking heads talk about issues like teacher quality, but the most important variable -- student quality -- is never mentioned.O Really wrote:No doubt. But that's not under control of the school, is it?Stinger wrote:I think Bill Maher's an ass who goes way to far, but he gets this one dead on.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b3vPkFhtGGI
The number one predictor of academic success is parental involvement.
Just blame it on the teachers.
More and more research coming up to show that pre-K is too late to address the vocabulary gap. It's there by 4 and will stay there, apparently.
Bungalow Bill wrote:Somebody just punked the CPF site with ugly dick pictures. Hilarious.
Apparently one of society's less capable, from the Blueballs Debate Club, is visiting.