What were the lies?Colonel Taylor wrote:
(Please source them.)
What were the lies?Colonel Taylor wrote:
1. Obama falsely claimed that Romney said “we should ask Pakistan for permission†prior to going there to kill someone. What Romney said was, “keep our options quiet.â€Âbannination wrote:What were the lies?Colonel Taylor wrote:
(Please source them.)
Military horses are also used in the "Old Guard" or Caisson Platton.Tertius wrote:Obama does not know what our military is doing. No horses really!
http://www.military.com/video/operation ... 907912001/
I dunno, so far it looks like you're the liar, not Obama.gongoozler wrote:1. Obama falsely claimed that Romney said “we should ask Pakistan for permission†prior to going there to kill someone. What Romney said was, “keep our options quiet.â€Âbannination wrote:What were the lies?Colonel Taylor wrote:
(Please source them.)
2. Obama accused Romney of lying when Romney said “you and I agreed†that some US troops should be left in Iraq. Obama failed to negotiate keeping 3,000 to 4,000 support troops there; Romney said he would have left 10,000 to 30,000.
3. Obama said military unemployment is lower than for the general population. Not true of veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan.
4. Obama claimed the record would back him up when he accused Romney of opposing any federal “help†or “assistance†for troubled automakers. In fact, the record shows Romney supported federal loan guarantees.
5. Obama wrongly claimed Romney called Russia the “biggest geopolitical threat facing America.†Actually, Romney called Russia a “foe†and not a “threat.†He said “the greatest threat that the world faces is a nuclear Iran.â€Â
Source: The Third Presidential Debate
OBAMA: You did not say that you would provide government help.bannination wrote:What were the lies?Colonel Taylor wrote:
(Please source them.)
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1012/82736.htmlThe American auto industry is vital to our national interest as an employer and as a hub for manufacturing. A managed bankruptcy may be the only path to the fundamental restructuring the industry needs. It would permit the companies to shed excess labor, pension and real estate costs. The federal government should provide guarantees for post-bankruptcy financing and assure car buyers that their warranties are not at risk.
Colonel Taylor wrote:OBAMA: You did not say that you would provide government help.bannination wrote:What were the lies?Colonel Taylor wrote:
(Please source them.)
What Romney said.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/19/opini ... html?_r=2&http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1012/82736.htmlThe American auto industry is vital to our national interest as an employer and as a hub for manufacturing. A managed bankruptcy may be the only path to the fundamental restructuring the industry needs. It would permit the companies to shed excess labor, pension and real estate costs. The federal government should provide guarantees for post-bankruptcy financing and assure car buyers that their warranties are not at risk.
On this one he even caught his own W-H off guard. With in minutes they were saying Obama DIDN'T SAY WHAT HE JUST DID. Please explain this one? His own people were lying within minutes.![]()
It's useless to go on about ALL OBAMA'S lies here because the libs will explode with anger and start lying and denying, then the name calling starts because they have nothing else.
Reality wrote: So my poll has 100% of the vote for Romney.
I did not say Obama set Stevens up to cover up Obama's gay activities in Chicago. You just did.Stinger wrote:You missed his repeated Freeper delusion about the "murder" of a "gay" ambassador.Vrede wrote:Tertius wrote:Obama does not know what our military is doing. No horses really!No he didn't.Tertius wrote:Obama says we no longer use bayonets...
"Well, Governor, we also have fewer horses and bayonets..."
You win the prize for first lies about this debate. Congrats!
Does anyone here realize that Tertius believes that Obama purposely set Ambassador Stevens up to be killed because Obama didn't want his and Stevens' gay activities in Chicago to come out?
Even Defective Colon and Butt Ugly aren't that unhinged.
Your link backs up my assertion that Romney said "foe" and not "threat". Thanks.bannination wrote:I dunno, so far it looks like you're the liar, not Obama.gongoozler wrote:1. Obama falsely claimed that Romney said “we should ask Pakistan for permission†prior to going there to kill someone. What Romney said was, “keep our options quiet.â€Âbannination wrote:What were the lies?Colonel Taylor wrote:
(Please source them.)
2. Obama accused Romney of lying when Romney said “you and I agreed†that some US troops should be left in Iraq. Obama failed to negotiate keeping 3,000 to 4,000 support troops there; Romney said he would have left 10,000 to 30,000.
3. Obama said military unemployment is lower than for the general population. Not true of veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan.
4. Obama claimed the record would back him up when he accused Romney of opposing any federal “help†or “assistance†for troubled automakers. In fact, the record shows Romney supported federal loan guarantees.
5. Obama wrongly claimed Romney called Russia the “biggest geopolitical threat facing America.†Actually, Romney called Russia a “foe†and not a “threat.†He said “the greatest threat that the world faces is a nuclear Iran.â€Â
Source: The Third Presidential Debate
SOURCE: http://cnnpressroom.blogs.cnn.com/2012/ ... tical-foe/
Forgive me if I don't believe your other 4 lies.... I'm not wasting my time looking them up.
The "debates" are simply another form of advertising. A show no more real than Jane Fonda's army helmet. Do you really think everyone is affected by the debate? Or that the vast majority of people haven't already made up their mind? It's all about the close areas, which undoubtedly isn't your neighborhood. Mine either, for that matter, although I don't have the Republican infestation that you apparently have.Reality wrote:Appears the comments from this forum about the debate tracks along party lines with cynicism from the usual players.
Nice to see O'Really doesn't care what either candidate has to say. It's the bump in the polls that he's interested in; you know those polls that draw a true representation of US citizen opinion. If I was to poll my neighbors Romney won hands down. Likewise all of my neighbors intend to vote for Romney, some already have. So my poll has 100% of the vote for Romney. Sorry O'Really, no bump for Obama from this locale.
Vrede wrote:One analysis, FACT CHECK: Flunking geography, history
1) Point Obama.
2) Point Obama. We can either spend it here, reduce the deficit (which has its own domestic benefits), or the mix implied by "some".
3) Huge point Obama.
4) Point Mitten.
5) Point Obama.
6) Point Obama, unless one thinks we should initiate military action.
7) Point Mitten.
8) Point Obama, since Mitten didn't tell the full truth.
9) Point Obama.
10) Point Obama, and Gore and Lieberman.
Obama 8, Mitten 2, Gore 1, Lieberman 1. Not that Tertius, Colonel Taylor, gongoozler and Reality really care about overall accuracy and honesty.
Colonel Taylor takes the prize, though. He quoted (#4) the same exact Fact Check, but deliberately neglected to link it or mention all the other points. What a lying baby!
The problem is that no one was watching and those who watched were bored to tears.Vrede wrote:One analysis, FACT CHECK: Flunking geography, history
1) Point Obama.
2) Point Obama. We can either spend it here, reduce the deficit (which has its own domestic benefits), or the mix implied by "some".
3) Huge point Obama.
4) Point Mitten.
5) Point Obama.
6) Point Obama, unless one thinks we should initiate military action.
7) Point Mitten.
8) Point Obama, since Mitten didn't tell the full truth.
9) Point Obama.
10) Point Obama, and Gore and Lieberman.
Obama 8, Mitten 2, Gore 1, Lieberman 1. Not that Tertius, Colonel Taylor, gongoozler and Reality really care about overall accuracy and honesty.
Colonel Taylor takes the prize, though. He quoted (#4) the same exact Fact Check, but deliberately neglected to link it or mention all the other points. What a lying baby!
I have no idea what you are talking about numbers. I found it as I was searching someplace. Boy I see your ESP and knowing all is trying to kick in there again ha. Get a life will ya.Vrede wrote:Vrede wrote:...Colonel Taylor takes the prize, though. He quoted (#4) the same exact Fact Check, but deliberately neglected to link it or mention all the other points. What a lying baby!I see, it was just an "accident" that you didn't link it and started with #4, and there's no way that this isn't just the excuse making of a lying baby that got caught again.Colonel Taylor wrote:Nope was going to do one at a time so your and your liberal friends can get your anger out slowly. Don't want to be responsible for any strokes or anything.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
As are these.... .gongoozler wrote:bannination wrote:What were the lies?Colonel Taylor wrote:
(Please source them.)
Source: The Third Presidential Debate