Ulysses wrote: ↑Tue Apr 07, 2020 8:46 pm
Vrede too wrote: ↑Tue Apr 07, 2020 7:17 pm
Ulysses wrote: ↑Tue Apr 07, 2020 7:13 pm
You don't think that if someone with $$$ or a high government position, and needs a ventilator, they won't be bumped to the front of the line?
Let's not be naive about what constitutes power in America.
If you are at that level of wealth or power I retract my post.
But, if you're just insured it's not like your insurance company will be fighting for you in order to cover your ventilation.
WTF? I'm starting to understand why you PO Billy so much. Where did I say my insurance company would be fighting for me to get a ventilator? All I said is that I
hope that IF I needed one I would get one. The fact that I'm insured would probably make it more likely than, say, somebody with zero health insurance and no ability to pay out of pocket.
Try not to parse other people's posts to turn them into nonsense just so you can jump down their throats, M'Kay?
PS-I admit I incorrectly sometimes referred to ventilator as respirator. My bad. I thought I had corrected all those. So sue me.
You sure are sensitive. You clearly implied the belief that your insured status should get you lifesaving care that others won't get. You're just backtracking after getting busted.
All I was doing was agreeing with you that money and power get you more stuff from the healthcare system, but they are things that someone has to wield effectively. However, in my expert opinion your just having insurance does not get you a ventilator before others that are sicker and uninsured. It's a notation on a form, not money or power that will go to bat for you. In fact, the insurance company has every incentive to not advocate for expensive care. Sure, insurance will get you elective care, but there are lots of disincentives on the hospitals' end to keep them from getting caught killing off the poor, and frankly I find your expectation that's what they should do to be offensive.
"Let's not be naive about what" causes scandals "in America." You need to look up EMTALA. It is specifically illegal for ERs, their staff and hospitals to make emergent decisions based on ability to pay, and in my career I never saw anyone break that law in the way that you want them to, certainly not when a life was on the line. You're throwing yet another tantrum purely out of your ignorance.
Now, please educate all of us on your expertise on this topic.