The "Benghazi was caused by a YouTube video" claim is fake new on your side's part.Mr.B wrote:
There were in fact a number of riots across the middle-east that were undeniably motivated by the video. And so in the hours after the attack the administration merely refused to label it terrorism until the facts came in. By the evening following the attack, Hillary's position was saying,"we know the attack in Libya had nothing to do with the film. It was a planned attack, not a protest."
Obama even took flak from those on the right rallying gullible partisan wingnuts - see mirror for details - because the day after the attack he called it an "act of terror" rather than "terrorism."
Also there's nothing "fake news" about peaceful protests. (If you disagree, we can also use any number of violent protests to paint whites as never having peaceful protests.) Nor was "Hands Up Don't Shoot" "fake news." It was inaccurate in the Michael Brown case, but given the many cases where it IS accurate, it was a reasonable assumption at the time. But your latest attempt to get racist alt-right street cred is noted.