Debate Thread

Generally an unmoderated forum for discussion of pretty much any topic. The focus however, is usually politics.
User avatar
Tertius
Squadron Leader
Posts: 379
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 11:07 pm

Re: Debate Thread

Unread post by Tertius »

Colonel Taylor wrote:^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
That is what many of the liberals here do, if something doesn't make them look good or make their point they change what you said then go off on what they wrote. I have never seen anyone do that but them, says a lot about them though!
Vrede and Stinger did it all the time on the other forum. The more you ignore them the worse they get, they need the attention. There was a liberal poster who did it to one of my post earlier today. How low does your self esteem have to be to change what others say so you can look good to your other liberal friends. Kind of sad actually.
Obviously they are one or two sick people.

User avatar
Colonel Taylor
Marshal
Posts: 994
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 8:51 pm

Re: Debate Thread

Unread post by Colonel Taylor »

Vrede wrote:Yikes! I did confuse which of the racist's posts you applauded. :oops: My heartfelt apologies. See how easy that is, Tertius and Colonel Taylor? You should try it sometime.

Your utter silence on this is noted:
Ragin Rebel wrote:And you will vote for a half-breed...
Of course, saying -
Tertius wrote:...Right on target....
- about this post of Ragin Rebel's, instead, is not much to brag about:
[color=#BF0000]Vrede[/color] wrote:
Ragin Rebel wrote:...Obama loses his ass in 3 straight debates...
He won 2 of them.
Ragin Rebel wrote:...Romney polling over 50%...
Nope: http://realclearpolitics.com/elections/. Plus, it's electoral votes that matter.
Ragin Rebel wrote:...Romney Landslide...
No landslide, whoever wins.
Ragin Rebel wrote:" I will stand with the Muslim's should the political winds shift in an ugly direction." ------Barack Hussein Obama
Lie.
This statement is a rewording of a passage from page 261 of The Audacity of Hope, in which Barack Obama spoke of the importance of not allowing inflamed public opinion to result in innocent members of immigrant groups being stripped of their rights, denied their due as American citizens, or placed into confinement, as was done with Japanese-Americans during World War II. The original contains no specific mention of "Muslims":
In the wake of 9/11, my meetings with Arab and Pakistani Americans, for example, have a more urgent quality, for the stories of detentions and FBI questioning and hard stares from neighbors have shaken their sense of security and belonging. They have been reminded that the history of immigration in this country has a dark underbelly; they need specific reassurances that their citizenship really means something, that America has learned the right lessons from the Japanese internments during World War II, and that I will stand with them should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/coilofrage.asp
What a 'tard you are, Ragin Rebel.

Note that Tertius only whines when a lefty uses the word "retard" but a righty that does so is "Right on target".

I guess Stinger is correct.
Thanks for reminding us, Tertius.

And, Colonel Taylor, your running away from your proven and linked deceptive editing and subsequent lies about it (page 4) is also noted. It's a shame for you that you're unable to man-up like I do when I flub.

Well if anyone here knows anything about deceptive editing it most certainly would be YOU. I still have no clue what you are talking about and surely am not going to go back and try to figure it out since YOU most likely edited something someplace anyway. See that was easy you should try admitting you edit things just to look good to your buds instead of digging deeper holes for ya self. :roll: :roll:

Supsalemgr
Marshal
Posts: 915
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 6:39 pm

Re: Debate Thread

Unread post by Supsalemgr »

Vrede is famous for editing others' posts. That is why I try not to respond as a reply to one of her posts because she has no shame. I post my own response that she cannot edit.

User avatar
Stinger
Sub-Lieutenant
Posts: 1944
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 10:18 pm

Re: Debate Thread

Unread post by Stinger »

Colonel Taylor wrote:
Vrede wrote:
And, Colonel Taylor, your running away from your proven and linked deceptive editing and subsequent lies about it (page 4) is also noted. It's a shame for you that you're unable to man-up like I do when I flub.

Well if anyone here knows anything about deceptive editing it most certainly would be YOU. I still have no clue what you are talking about and surely am not going to go back and try to figure it out since YOU most likely edited something someplace anyway. See that was easy you should try admitting you edit things just to look good to your buds instead of digging deeper holes for ya self. :roll: :roll:
And there you have it. Another Defective Thong / Colon Tickler cut and run. The boy is consistent.

He mentioned the page of your lies and deceptive editing, and, instead of manning up or arguing, you just cut and run again.

Vrede, that was like taking candy from a baby. A really slow baby.

User avatar
Stinger
Sub-Lieutenant
Posts: 1944
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 10:18 pm

Re: Debate Thread

Unread post by Stinger »

Supsalemgr wrote:Vrede is famous for editing others' posts. That is why I try not to respond as a reply to one of her posts because she has no shame. I post my own response that she cannot edit.
Soupy Sales is famous for saying things that ain't so.

Post an example of Vrede deceptively editing anything.

That's what I thought. More yak with nothing to back it up.

User avatar
Colonel Taylor
Marshal
Posts: 994
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 8:51 pm

Re: Debate Thread

Unread post by Colonel Taylor »

Stinger you boast about being the most honest thing since the KoolAid you drink yet you like Obama Lie everytime your lips move. You as well as Vrede on the other forum used to edit post ALL THE TIME, now since you have proven you have no idea what truth is go stand on your corner and wait for your guvmit handouts. :roll:
I haven't run like you who just sits back and makes things up. I just rarely read your post since there is usually no truth to them what so ever.
Now commence with the name calling like the little baby you have proven to be. :lol:



Stinger wrote:
Colonel Taylor wrote:
Vrede wrote:
And, Colonel Taylor, your running away from your proven and linked deceptive editing and subsequent lies about it (page 4) is also noted. It's a shame for you that you're unable to man-up like I do when I flub.

Well if anyone here knows anything about deceptive editing it most certainly would be YOU. I still have no clue what you are talking about and surely am not going to go back and try to figure it out since YOU most likely edited something someplace anyway. See that was easy you should try admitting you edit things just to look good to your buds instead of digging deeper holes for ya self. :roll: :roll:
And there you have it. Another Defective Thong / Colon Tickler cut and run. The boy is consistent.

He mentioned the page of your lies and deceptive editing, and, instead of manning up or arguing, you just cut and run again.

Vrede, that was like taking candy from a baby. A really slow baby.

bannination
Captain
Posts: 5592
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:58 am
Location: Hendersonville
Contact:

Re: Debate Thread

Unread post by bannination »

I edit quotes in replies as well to make it more readable. Unless someone actually changed your words, what's wrong with that?

If you think people are lying all the time post some proof, prove them wrong with sources, etc. That's how it works.

Colonel Taylor wrote:Stinger you boast about being the most honest thing since the KoolAid you drink yet you like Obama Lie everytime your lips move. You as well as Vrede on the other forum used to edit post ALL THE TIME, now since you have proven you have no idea what truth is go stand on your corner and wait for your guvmit handouts. :roll:
I haven't run like you who just sits back and makes things up. I just rarely read your post since there is usually no truth to them what so ever.
Now commence with the name calling like the little baby you have proven to be. :lol:



Stinger wrote:
Colonel Taylor wrote:
Vrede wrote:
And, Colonel Taylor, your running away from your proven and linked deceptive editing and subsequent lies about it (page 4) is also noted. It's a shame for you that you're unable to man-up like I do when I flub.

Well if anyone here knows anything about deceptive editing it most certainly would be YOU. I still have no clue what you are talking about and surely am not going to go back and try to figure it out since YOU most likely edited something someplace anyway. See that was easy you should try admitting you edit things just to look good to your buds instead of digging deeper holes for ya self. :roll: :roll:
And there you have it. Another Defective Thong / Colon Tickler cut and run. The boy is consistent.

He mentioned the page of your lies and deceptive editing, and, instead of manning up or arguing, you just cut and run again.

Vrede, that was like taking candy from a baby. A really slow baby.

User avatar
Crock Hunter
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 648
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 6:40 pm
Location: THIS USER IS BANNED

Re: Debate Thread

Unread post by Crock Hunter »

gongoozler wrote:
billy.pilgrim wrote:
O Really wrote:
gongoozler wrote:
Nobody's perfect. Anyway, the president has nothing to do with a decades-old Supreme Court ruling.
You're right. Could you explain that to some of your right-wing buds who want to make abortion opposition a litmus test for everybody from dog-catcher on up?

that's exactly what goozer has been spouting - well that is - up until rmoney won the primary, then goozie changed his panties and threw away his principles
I've never had a litmus test.
Indeed.. your test required a color chart.. .
`~~~:< .. Welcome to the Swamp.. .. Swim Fast..

User avatar
Colonel Taylor
Marshal
Posts: 994
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 8:51 pm

Re: Debate Thread

Unread post by Colonel Taylor »

Kind of hard since the other forum is now gone.
I did post many many many post that Vrede and Stinger edited over there. They did their bests to TWIST when called out on it then the name calling. That's all they had.
The reason I never mentioned you is because you never changed words as they did. Just yesterday here someone changed a picture I posted.
You don't find it strange that the ones doing the editing are all liberals? :?: :!: :!:
bannination wrote:I edit quotes in replies as well to make it more readable. Unless someone actually changed your words, what's wrong with that?

If you think people are lying all the time post some proof, prove them wrong with sources, etc. That's how it works.

Colonel Taylor wrote:Stinger you boast about being the most honest thing since the KoolAid you drink yet you like Obama Lie everytime your lips move. You as well as Vrede on the other forum used to edit post ALL THE TIME, now since you have proven you have no idea what truth is go stand on your corner and wait for your guvmit handouts. :roll:
I haven't run like you who just sits back and makes things up. I just rarely read your post since there is usually no truth to them what so ever.
Now commence with the name calling like the little baby you have proven to be. :lol:



Stinger wrote:
Colonel Taylor wrote:
Vrede wrote:
And, Colonel Taylor, your running away from your proven and linked deceptive editing and subsequent lies about it (page 4) is also noted. It's a shame for you that you're unable to man-up like I do when I flub.

Well if anyone here knows anything about deceptive editing it most certainly would be YOU. I still have no clue what you are talking about and surely am not going to go back and try to figure it out since YOU most likely edited something someplace anyway. See that was easy you should try admitting you edit things just to look good to your buds instead of digging deeper holes for ya self. :roll: :roll:
And there you have it. Another Defective Thong / Colon Tickler cut and run. The boy is consistent.

He mentioned the page of your lies and deceptive editing, and, instead of manning up or arguing, you just cut and run again.

Vrede, that was like taking candy from a baby. A really slow baby.

User avatar
Tertius
Squadron Leader
Posts: 379
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 11:07 pm

Re: Debate Thread

Unread post by Tertius »

bannination wrote:I edit quotes in replies as well to make it more readable. Unless someone actually changed your words, what's wrong with that?
If I post that I agree with one particular post. Then an individual applies my statement to one edited phrase of a completely different post and you ask "what's wrong with that?"

Of course I did prove the person is a lier as you suggested.

I still find your indifferent attitude strange.

User avatar
Crock Hunter
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 648
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 6:40 pm
Location: THIS USER IS BANNED

Re: Debate Thread

Unread post by Crock Hunter »

Colonel Taylor wrote: Just yesterday here someone changed a picture I posted.
You know what they say F'um if they can't take a joke.. ..

So when you nitwits can't post facts...you complain about the rules. .. sounds like Rmoney during the debates..
`~~~:< .. Welcome to the Swamp.. .. Swim Fast..

User avatar
Colonel Taylor
Marshal
Posts: 994
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 8:51 pm

Re: Debate Thread

Unread post by Colonel Taylor »

So you agree changing others post including words to make one look better is acceptable to you libs? Just wondering is all?
I personally think it shows a sign of some pretty bad mental illness that you can't take what is being said, you have to change a post to make yourself feel better. In the world whether it be work or real life it may even be criminal, then that would explain a lot. A joke is one thing which is most of the pictures I post, but to replace words then repaste it as someone else s is not only wrong but pretty sick.
Crock Hunter wrote:
Colonel Taylor wrote: Just yesterday here someone changed a picture I posted.
You know what they say F'um if they can't take a joke.. ..

So when you nitwits can't post facts...you complain about the rules. .. sounds like Rmoney during the debates..

bannination
Captain
Posts: 5592
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:58 am
Location: Hendersonville
Contact:

Re: Debate Thread

Unread post by bannination »

Don't worry, I don't think anyone seriously thought you posted that picture. It was obviously in jest.

I don't know if they did or didn't edit your replies on the other forum, if they do it here, be sure to document it clearly, as it will make your case for whatever you discussing stronger.

Colonel Taylor wrote:Kind of hard since the other forum is now gone.
I did post many many many post that Vrede and Stinger edited over there. They did their bests to TWIST when called out on it then the name calling. That's all they had.
The reason I never mentioned you is because you never changed words as they did. Just yesterday here someone changed a picture I posted.
You don't find it strange that the ones doing the editing are all liberals? :?: :!: :!:

User avatar
Crock Hunter
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 648
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 6:40 pm
Location: THIS USER IS BANNED

Re: Debate Thread

Unread post by Crock Hunter »

Colonel Taylor wrote:So you agree changing others post including words to make one look better is acceptable to you libs?
No.. it was a lighthearted jab.. I certainly don't need to change your words to make myself look better..

Colonel Taylor wrote: I personally think it shows a sign of some pretty bad mental illness that you can't take what is being said,
Can't tell .. . I guess I'll just have to wait until you actually say something to make that call .. .
`~~~:< .. Welcome to the Swamp.. .. Swim Fast..

Supsalemgr
Marshal
Posts: 915
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 6:39 pm

Re: Debate Thread

Unread post by Supsalemgr »

Stinger wrote:
Supsalemgr wrote:Vrede is famous for editing others' posts. That is why I try not to respond as a reply to one of her posts because she has no shame. I post my own response that she cannot edit.
Soupy Sales is famous for saying things that ain't so.

Post an example of Vrede deceptively editing anything.

That's what I thought. More yak with nothing to back it up.
The BRN no longer exists and I quit "replying" quite some time before she was banned from that board. So, Stinger will just have to live with it.

:lol: :lol: :lol:

User avatar
O Really
Admiral
Posts: 23149
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm

Re: Debate Thread

Unread post by O Really »

[drum roll] .....For being able to pwn entire legions of righties with one flick of the wrist, this week's award goes to .......Vrede!
Attachments
yankaward2.gif
yankaward2.gif (6.18 KiB) Viewed 1266 times

User avatar
Colonel Taylor
Marshal
Posts: 994
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 8:51 pm

Re: Debate Thread

Unread post by Colonel Taylor »

Vrede wrote:
Colonel Taylor wrote:...I personally think it shows a sign of some pretty bad mental illness that you can't take what is being said, you have to change a post to make yourself feel better...
Since that's what you did with the Fact Check article you incompletely quoted to make Mitten look good, you just called yourself mentally ill. Thank you, but we already knew it.
Vrede do you ever tell the truth or do ya think your liberal friends just believe ya because you lie more then most. You are just like Obama just keep telling the same lie and eventually you believe it. I still have no idea what you are talking about I never edited a thing, I was searching seen that one example and used it. The End.
Now go back with Stinger to your editing of post to make yourself feel feel good. :roll:

Reality
Wing commander
Posts: 485
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2012 4:39 am

Re: Debate Thread

Unread post by Reality »

Vrede is Stinger but she won't admit it. No two people could be that much in sync unless they were one and the same.

User avatar
Colonel Taylor
Marshal
Posts: 994
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 8:51 pm

Re: Debate Thread

Unread post by Colonel Taylor »

There is no doubt that they are mentally ill. I've worked with kids and young adults for years and the ones who just go off on name calling tangents like Stinger end up with serious mental issues. They're angry all the time and don't know how to cope or get along with others. Then when they see they are being called out they go into their alternate universe. They on the forums make up dozens of forum names to cover for their insecurities.
Vrede will lie and edit anything to make herself look superior to her other liberal posters, Either bi-polar or serious self esteem issues so she has to continually reassure herself she is the best no matter how she does it. One way is all the other forum names to feel in control of all of them. Sybil come to mind?

Reality
Wing commander
Posts: 485
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2012 4:39 am

Re: Debate Thread

Unread post by Reality »

We do not need any proof that editing is taking place Banni, you admitted it is happening and you wouln't call it on your lib/lefty friends unless it was called by your lib/left friends.

Post Reply