more gop voter fraud puts acorn to shame

[billy.pilgrim]

after getting caught in the 2004 and 2008 elections, the gop did finally ask their operative, Nathan Sproul, to come up with some new company names and granted the gop did claim to have disassociate themselves with him after his companies were caught destroying democratic registration forms last month but oops the gop and sproul have been caught working under new corporate name destroying voter registration forms in virginia


remember all the bs hoopla about the fake voter fraud by acorn (shhh - don't tell tag-along - he still believes it), now we have real bonafide voter fraud and not a peep from ludie of faux news

[Reality]

Got a source there pilgrim or did your Geritol kick in?

[billy.pilgrim]

Got a source there pilgrim or did your Geritol kick in?

you foxies don't get out much - do ya


there has been so much about sproul that I'm sure the google can find you more than enough


Florida has turned up questionable practices in 11 counties, although Palm Beach county was the most publicized. After the Fla problems several other states found similar problems (it was on all the networks but 1) and the gop announced that they cut all ties (after paying the guy 22 million dollars)

but oops - yesterday his companies were caught in virginia

if you can't find the info, let me know and I'll give you the links later

[O Really]

I love voter fraud. It's so easy in NC that I voted 10 times the first day the polls opened, and about 10 times a day since then. All because they don't require picture ID! It's not like they have lists, with addresses, or anything. I just go to the closest graveyard and copy down some names. Go to the polls, tell them who I am and voila! another Dem vote. Yeppers, no control at all, but if they ever require a picture ID, I'll have to make up a bunch of them.

But let's see a picture ID put the Sproul type fraud out of business. Right.

[Reality]

More forward stick O'Really.

[billy.pilgrim]

guess reality don't google - or if he does he don't come back and admit that the gop knowingly hires crooks to commit real voter fraud

[O Really]

More forward stick O'Really.

What - you have a problem with sarcasm? Truth is, it's not that easy to impersonate many people at the poll, and there's not a lot of that goes on. If for no other reason than it's a pretty impractical way to affect results. On the other hand, cutting out large number of people through de facto disqualification can. According to Pennsylvania House Majority Leader Mike Turzai, "Voter ID, which is gonna allow Governor Romney to win the state of Pennsylvania, done,” Turzai said to the Republican State Committee.

[billy.pilgrim]

More forward stick O'Really.

What - you have a problem with sarcasm? Truth is, it's not that easy to impersonate many people at the poll, and there's not a lot of that goes on. If for no other reason than it's a pretty impractical way to affect results. On the other hand, cutting out large number of people through de facto disqualification can. According to Pennsylvania House Majority Leader Mike Turzai, "Voter ID, which is gonna allow Governor Romney to win the state of Pennsylvania, done,” Turzai said to the Republican State Committee.

much of the real suppression the gop has done is legal - unethical undemocratic but legal

gop funding spurl for the past 9 years has been illegal since the day the gop found out he was involved in voter fraud (I think he was first outed in about 2007)

spurl has probably been a crook since elementary school but sadly I don't have a link

[O Really]

Yeah, Sproul's a real work... http://www.truth-out.org/buzzflash/comm ... on-scandal

[billy.pilgrim]

you would think that everyone would be upset about real voter fraud

understandably there was controversy regarding acorn 1-there was no actual voter fraud and 2-the fake news channel continued to report that there was real voter fraud, so the small minded faux watchers were confused when presented with the facts and continue to this day to claim that acorn committed fraud

and demint's bill to have acorns renamed patriot seeds threw a lot of people

but this sproul guy has been committing actual fraud for at least 9 years and the best that comes out of the gop - they tell the guy to change his company name before they can award him another 6 million dollar contract


now I know how bad suppermanager tag hates voter fraud (he has 18 bumper stickers plastered on his car with crossed out pictures of acorns) and the upstate posters know that he has never allowed a single post about acorn go by with his idiotic tag-along praise for all acorn criticism
but here we have real fraud and not a peep out of tag

I reckon it ain't the fraud that upset him after all

[Reality]

Pilgrim, you violate the Vrede rule of posting if you do not bring your own links that prove what you have to say.

O'Really, do you know what "more forward stick means".

[bannination]

Pilgrim, you violate the Vrede rule of posting if you do not bring your own links that prove what you have to say.

O'Really, do you know what "more forward stick means".

What Pilgrim wrote is fairly common knowledge, do you dispute it? Which part would you like a source for?

[O Really]

Pilgrim, you violate the Vrede rule of posting if you do not bring your own links that prove what you have to say.

O'Really, do you know what "more forward stick means".

I think it's original meaning had something to do with piloting a plane, but in the current context I think it means, "I'd rather keep carping at posters than commenting on the topic." So what is your view on voter fraud, if you have one?

[Apache]

Its only news worthy if the Dems are involved.

[O Really]

Pilgrim, you violate the Vrede rule of posting if you do not bring your own links that prove what you have to say.

O'Really, do you know what "more forward stick means".

You are confused, as usual. I like doing research and proving wingnuts wrong. You're just too lazy and incompetent to try or succeed.

We do have some who don't seem to know the difference in "opinion", statement of fact, conclusion, supposition, or innuendo. Not that anyone has to go along, but here's how I see it:

1. If you want to say Obama had a poor performance at the debate, that's your opinion, no link or evidence necessary.
2. If you want to say that Obama was wrong in his handling of Libya, that's still opinion, but it would be nice to know at least what facts you're basing that opinion on.
3. If you want to say that Obama shot Romney the bird off-camera at the debates, we'll need some evidence.
4. If you agree with someone else's opinion, fine, but give them credit as an opinion. Quoting yourself as a source doesn't count.
5. If one source seems suspicious for whatever reason, get another source.
6. "That's just what I believe" is fine, but don't expect much credibility from others on in.

[billy.pilgrim]

Pilgrim, you violate the Vrede rule of posting if you do not bring your own links that prove what you have to say.

O'Really, do you know what "more forward stick means".

You are confused, as usual. I like doing research and proving wingnuts wrong. You're just too lazy and incompetent to try or succeed.

We do have some who don't seem to know the difference in "opinion", statement of fact, conclusion, supposition, or innuendo. Not that anyone has to go along, but here's how I see it:

1. If you want to say Obama had a poor performance at the debate, that's your opinion, no link or evidence necessary.
2. If you want to say that Obama was wrong in his handling of Libya, that's still opinion, but it would be nice to know at least what facts you're basing that opinion on.
3. If you want to say that Obama shot Romney the bird off-camera at the debates, we'll need some evidence.
4. If you agree with someone else's opinion, fine, but give them credit as an opinion. Quoting yourself as a source doesn't count.
5. If one source seems suspicious for whatever reason, get another source.
6. "That's just what I believe" is fine, but don't expect much credibility from others on in.

7) common knowledge doesn't necessarily require links and sources
8) obtaining information exclusively from faux news, wnd and brietbart is no excuse for lack of knowledge concerning common events

[jknowgood]

Department of Justice: Investigate Ohio Voting Machines owned by Tagg Romney (petition)

Maybe this is the "punch in the nose" the blowhard threatened.

You dont even no what you are talking about.We proved yhat acorn was cheating and now youre feelings are hurt, well wa wa wa

[Stinger]

Pilgrim, you violate the Vrede rule of posting if you do not bring your own links that prove what you have to say.

O'Really, do you know what "more forward stick means".

I think it's original meaning had something to do with piloting a plane, but in the current context I think it means, "I'd rather keep carping at posters than commenting on the topic." So what is your view on voter fraud, if you have one?

Not bad, but a more accurate translation might be: "I'd rather keep carping at other posters in hopes that people might buy my 'I'm so superior' nonsense. It's so much safer than trying to make an actual comment on the topic and demonstrating what an ignorant, incompetent buffoon I really am."

Something like that.

[O Really]

Pilgrim, you violate the Vrede rule of posting if you do not bring your own links that prove what you have to say.

O'Really, do you know what "more forward stick means".

I think it's original meaning had something to do with piloting a plane, but in the current context I think it means, "I'd rather keep carping at posters than commenting on the topic." So what is your view on voter fraud, if you have one?

Not bad, but a more accurate translation might be: "I'd rather keep carping at other posters in hopes that people might buy my 'I'm so superior' nonsense. It's so much safer than trying to make an actual comment on the topic and demonstrating what an ignorant, incompetent buffoon I really am."

Something like that.

Sounds about right to me. I stand corrected. Or at least improved.

[billy.pilgrim]

so far not a single comment by anyone on the right condemning this 7 year history of blatant voter fraud, just nonsensical requests for links and multiple "you did it too" threads from the forum cut and paste moron.

sorry guys, it's really too bad that you get your information from such limited sources that what is common information to many is unheard by you. I suggest you use the google. it will provide you with thousands of links to information about mr sproul. just type "sproul" and click search

it is really a shame that you have so little regard for our democratic process