The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments today in a case called Kirtsaeng v. Wiley, and their final decision could help shape the future of "first sale," a legal doctrine that underpins the right to sell, lend, or give away the things you buy, even if those things contain copyrighted elements.
You may have a point, Partisan. So who do you think should decide disputes over how the specific words of the Constitution should be applied in a given situation? And should every decision be made starting from scratch, or should previous decisions on similar subjects be considered. How would the legal world according to Partisan62 work?
