What the....?
- homerfobe
- Ensign
- Posts: 1565
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 9:37 am
- Location: All over more than anywhere else.
Re: What the....?
Seems no body else knows either. Ask Vrede; sounds like something he'd be familiar with.Leo Lyons wrote:what in hell is a pisskop?
Had it been pisscup, that would be up Buttcracker's alley.
Proudly Telling It Like It Is: In Your Face! Whether You Like It Or Not!
- Stinger
- Sub-Lieutenant
- Posts: 1944
- Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 10:18 pm
Re: What the....?
Afrikaans insult, mainly for Englishmen. Piss head. I think it's a step or two down from chucklehead.
- Bungalow Bill
- Ensign
- Posts: 1340
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 8:12 pm
- Location: Downtown Mills River
Re: What the....?
Never visited it before now. Looks like the same old wingnut circle jerk. 

- rstrong
- Captain
- Posts: 5889
- Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:32 am
- Location: Winnipeg, MB
Re: What the....?
"This word you keep using - conservative - I don't think it means what you think it means."
- Ombudsman
- Ensign
- Posts: 1268
- Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2013 1:03 pm
Re: What the....?
Wonder why that Taxed guy is so hell bent on protecting the rest of them from enduring any fact that might make them uncomfortable? I'm surprised he's found so many so willing to play dutiful disciple. You'd think more of them would have some self-respect.
Wing nuts. Not just for breakfast anymore.
- Bungalow Bill
- Ensign
- Posts: 1340
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 8:12 pm
- Location: Downtown Mills River
Re: What the....?
Great site, if you're looking for a few good laughs. Mostly it seems to be the same
old wingnut paranoia and exaggeration. I checked out the 2012 presidntial election
prediction thread and just about everybody picked Romeny, some by large margins.
Then, around 9 p.m. on election night, crickets. One "expert" was talking about the
1986 electoral college map, but of course there was no U.S. presdiential election in
1986. Wingnuts=Hilarious.
old wingnut paranoia and exaggeration. I checked out the 2012 presidntial election
prediction thread and just about everybody picked Romeny, some by large margins.
Then, around 9 p.m. on election night, crickets. One "expert" was talking about the
1986 electoral college map, but of course there was no U.S. presdiential election in
1986. Wingnuts=Hilarious.

- homerfobe
- Ensign
- Posts: 1565
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 9:37 am
- Location: All over more than anywhere else.
Re: What the....?
What did I tell ya?homerfobe wrote:Seems no body else knows either. Ask Vrede; sounds like something he'd be familiar with.Leo Lyons wrote:what in hell is a pisskop?
Vrede wrote:He's a lurker from the Conservative Political Forum..."Brave" enough to whine about us in his wet nurse-protected forum...But too chicken to post in this one....With a white man avatar and in a southern con forum.
Proudly Telling It Like It Is: In Your Face! Whether You Like It Or Not!
- homerfobe
- Ensign
- Posts: 1565
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 9:37 am
- Location: All over more than anywhere else.
Re: What the....?
Wonder what you were looking for? All you had to do is initiate a search. :-0?>Vrede wrote:I discovered the who by accident, Stinger knew the what 2 days before that. You fail comprehension, again.
Proudly Telling It Like It Is: In Your Face! Whether You Like It Or Not!
- Leo Lyons
- Ensign
- Posts: 1787
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 8:14 am
Re: What the....?
I suppose I could have attempted a search on the name; sure would have thwarted this thread.Vrede wrote: His having never posted here, it didn't occur to me that pisskop is a wet nurse CPF clown. I just discovered him there when reading a thread. No surprise that you are confused by it all.
- Ombudsman
- Ensign
- Posts: 1268
- Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2013 1:03 pm
Re: What the....?
Supsalesmgr encouraged him to troll here: http://conservativepoliticalforum.com/p ... atives/30/Vrede wrote:I didn't, just an accident that I stumbled upon it, and he would have used a different handle if he was smart. Are you a CPF poster, too? What do you think of it?Leo Lyons wrote:I suppose I could have attempted a search on the name; sure would have thwarted this thread.Vrede wrote:His having never posted here, it didn't occur to me that pisskop is a wet nurse CPF clown. I just discovered him there when reading a thread. No surprise that you are confused by it all.
Wing nuts. Not just for breakfast anymore.
- Leo Lyons
- Ensign
- Posts: 1787
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 8:14 am
Re: What the....?
No, I am not, and I don't have much opinion of the site.Vrede wrote: Are you a CPF poster, too? What do you think of it?
I clicked on the link you provided, and after reading a few of the posts, I left it; too much conservatism for me. I have enough to do just duking it out with the liberals in this forum.
I consider myself mildly conservative and mildly liberal; depends on the subject.
I don't care much for the extremism in either of the ideologies.
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 10:33 am
Re: What the....?
Why I have to post? I found nothing worht posting about, and have a mcuh more active forum I attend to with a predominate liberal base. You guys seem to simply be a reciprical of the CPF. A less active version.
EDIT: How rude of me not to introduce myself. I am pisskop.
EDIT: How rude of me not to introduce myself. I am pisskop.
[Something to be determined later]
- Boatrocker
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 2066
- Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 11:53 am
- Location: Southeast of Disorder
Re: What the....?
Well, our spelling and grammar are better.
People are crazy and times are strange. I'm locked in tight, I'm out of range.
I used to care, but, things have changed.
I used to care, but, things have changed.
- rstrong
- Captain
- Posts: 5889
- Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:32 am
- Location: Winnipeg, MB
Re: What the....?
If this place seems "liberal", it's only because the neocons run away when someone disagrees with them, explains why, and provides citations.pisskop wrote:Why I have to post? I found nothing worht posting about, and have a mcuh more active forum I attend to with a predominate liberal base. You guys seem to simply be a reciprical of the CPF. A less active version.
No-one is banning conservatives. I'm still here for example. No-one is banning neocons like bowhunter/nascarfan88. Just the opposite, they've even been given moderator rights in thier own subforum.
The CPF site on the hand bans people just for the mere accusation of being "liberal" by bowhunter/nascarfan88, his definition of "liberal" being "anyone who disagrees with him." (Bowhunter/nascarfan88 has a long history of calling me a "liberal", often when *I'm* the one siding with long-term Republican policy. But when asked what makes me a "liberal", he runs away every time.)
- Crock Hunter
- Lieutenant Colonel
- Posts: 648
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 6:40 pm
- Location: THIS USER IS BANNED
Re: What the....?
What I found very interesting about the nitwit echo chamber you call a forum is that everyone there is for the most part exactly like the thing they claim to hate most.. The outcasts that make up the ironically named CPF see no problem with special privileges for some.. the censoring of speech.. intolerance towards religion.. government spending (on crap they like) .. government intervention (on crap they don't like.) . .. . CPF may be the largest collection of illiterate right-wing, knuckle-dragging hypocrites to have ever collectively kissed Sarah Palin's carbuncled ass.. ... . .pisskop wrote:Why I have to post? I found nothing worht posting about, and have a mcuh more active forum I attend to with a predominate liberal base. You guys seem to simply be a reciprical of the CPF. A less active version.
Cathartically speaking..from your drooling porch pup suppersalesmng to your shit for brains despotic boob Solar (Jesus.. judging from his idiotic ramblings.. I've forgotten more about solar technology than that shithead ever knew) and everyone in between .. you nitwits need a series of enemas..
If any of you have the stones.. come on back ... At least here you won't be banned for posting facts..
`~~~:< .. Welcome to the Swamp.. .. Swim Fast..
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 10:33 am
Re: What the....?
I know nothing about it. I do find that as more and more on the right become more disenchanted they become less tolerant of what they see as weak or contributing to the weakening of the nation. CPF is hardly alone in that regard.rstrong wrote:If this place seems "liberal", it's only because the neocons run away when someone disagrees with them, explains why, and provides citations.pisskop wrote:Why I have to post? I found nothing worht posting about, and have a mcuh more active forum I attend to with a predominate liberal base. You guys seem to simply be a reciprical of the CPF. A less active version.
No-one is banning conservatives. I'm still here for example. No-one is banning neocons like bowhunter/nascarfan88. Just the opposite, they've even been given moderator rights in thier own subforum.
The CPF site on the hand bans people just for the mere accusation of being "liberal" by bowhunter/nascarfan88, his definition of "liberal" being "anyone who disagrees with him." (Bowhunter/nascarfan88 has a long history of calling me a "liberal", often when *I'm* the one siding with long-term Republican policy. But when asked what makes me a "liberal", he runs away every time.)
To be honest, I'm sure I fall left of many of them there too. I lived in a different enviornment than most of them, and was actually raised by some very 'liberal' figures.
??? I found less four or five active threads a day when I checked here. Had I come over here and said that would you have lauded me for my courage?Vrede wrote:You don't have to post and no one said you did. I just pointed out that you hadn't.pisskop wrote:Why I have to post? I found nothing worht posting about, and have a mcuh more active forum I attend to with a predominate liberal base. You guys seem to simply be a reciprical of the CPF. A less active version.
EDIT: How rude of me not to introduce myself. I am pisskop.
The difference between here and CPF is we don't have wet nurses banning anyone, especially ones that commit the stunning ethical lapse of banning people that they are debating. Set aside partisanship for a moment, don't you see a problem with that?
What's rude is your whining about BRDF on CPF without having the stones to say so here. Of course, we would be happy to gripe about CPF there, but your wet nurse prevents that.
While I doubt everyone over there is always . . . on their A game, I don't think they'll all idiots. Its clear that this goes back farther than I care to look and as such I plan to stay right out of the feud you all seem to have.Crock Hunter wrote:What I found very interesting about the nitwit echo chamber you call a forum is that everyone there is for the most part exactly like the thing they claim to hate most.. The outcasts that make up the ironically named CPF see no problem with special privileges for some.. the censoring of speech.. intolerance towards religion.. government spending (on crap they like) .. government intervention (on crap they don't like.) . .. . CPF may be the largest collection of illiterate right-wing, knuckle-dragging hypocrites to have ever collectively kissed Sarah Palin's carbuncled ass.. ... . .pisskop wrote:Why I have to post? I found nothing worht posting about, and have a mcuh more active forum I attend to with a predominate liberal base. You guys seem to simply be a reciprical of the CPF. A less active version.
Cathartically speaking..from your drooling porch pup suppersalesmng to your shit for brains despotic boob Solar (Jesus.. judging from his idiotic ramblings.. I've forgotten more about solar technology than that shithead ever knew) and everyone in between .. you nitwits need a series of enemas..
If any of you have the stones.. come on back ... At least here you won't be banned for posting facts..
Fact is, I agree with much of the sentiment over there, and despite some questionable links or erroneous philosophies I find no reason not to listen to them. After all, I'm capable of making my own judgements.
------
I also would never use a different handle; not unless I actually changed my primary one. Nothing I feel the need to hide. I have nothing inherently against any of you (unless you're Rune, fu-rget him).
[Something to be determined later]
- Leo Lyons
- Ensign
- Posts: 1787
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 8:14 am
Re: What the....?
Username:pisskoppisskop wrote:Why I have to post? I found nothing worht posting about, and have a mcuh more active forum I attend to with a predominate liberal base. You guys seem to simply be a reciprical of the CPF.
Occupation: Student
Interests: Psychology, Philosophy, Economy, Politics, Pre-gunpowder warfare, History, etc.
You should have mastered spelling/spell check first!

There's someone here named Homerfobe that could possibly use your services.
- rstrong
- Captain
- Posts: 5889
- Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:32 am
- Location: Winnipeg, MB
Re: What the....?
Heh. I posted the evidence for Sarah Palin being foreign-born over at CPF. Clearly as a joke at birthers' expense. Sure enough a birther - an Administrator and "Hero Member" yet - is trying to prove that Obama is foreign-born.
Wingnut Political Forum. Nothing "conservative" about it.
Wingnut Political Forum. Nothing "conservative" about it.
- GoCubsGo
- Admiral
- Posts: 21713
- Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 2:22 am
Re: What the....?
Hey pisskop,
Why Don't you ask Solar if the government can mandate buying car insurance and firearms, why not health insurance?
Why Don't you ask Solar if the government can mandate buying car insurance and firearms, why not health insurance?
Eamus Catuli~AC 000000 000101 010202 020303 010304 020405....Ahhhh, forget it, it's gonna be a while.
Foxtrot
Delta
Tango
Foxtrot
Delta
Tango