Phony in Chief by Thomas Sowell

[Tertius]

Tuesday, October 09, 2012


When President Barack Obama and others on the left are not busy admonishing the rest of us to be "civil" in our discussions of political issues, they are busy letting loose insults, accusations and smears against those who dare to disagree with them.

Like so many people who have been beaten in a verbal encounter, and who can think of clever things to say the next day, after it is all over, President Obama, after his clear loss in his debate with Mitt Romney, called Governor Romney a "phony."

Innumerable facts, however, show that it is our Commander in Chief who is Phony in Chief. A classic example was his speech to a predominantly black audience at Hampton University on June 5, 2007. That date is important, as we shall see.

In his speech -- delivered in a ghetto-style accent that Obama doesn't use anywhere except when he is addressing a black audience -- he charged the federal government with not showing the same concern for the people of New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina hit as they had shown for the people of New York after the 9/11 attacks, or the people of Florida after Hurricane Andrew hit.

Departing from his prepared remarks, he mentioned the Stafford Act, which requires communities receiving federal disaster relief to contribute 10 percent as much as the federal government does.

Senator Obama, as he was then, pointed out that this requirement was waived in the case of New York and Florida because the people there were considered to be "part of the American family." But the people in New Orleans -- predominantly black -- "they don't care about as much," according to Barack Obama.

If you want to know what community organizers do, this is it -- rub people's emotions raw to hype their resentments. And this was Barack Obama in his old community organizer role, a role that should have warned those who thought that he was someone who would bring us together, when he was all too well practiced in the arts of polarizing us apart.

Why is the date of this speech important? Because, less than two weeks earlier, on May 24, 2007, the United States Senate had in fact voted 80-14 to waive the Stafford Act requirement for New Orleans, as it had waived that requirement for New York and Florida. More federal money was spent rebuilding New Orleans than was spent in New York after 9/11 and in Florida after Hurricane Andrew, combined.

Truth is not a job requirement for a community organizer. Nor can Barack Obama claim that he wasn't present the day of that Senate vote, as he claimed he wasn't there when Jeremiah Wright unleashed his obscene attacks on America from the pulpit of the church that Obama attended for 20 years.

Unlike Jeremiah Wright's church, the U.S. Senate keeps a record of who was there on a given day. The Congressional Record for May 24, 2007, shows Senator Barack Obama present that day and voting on the bill that waived the Stafford Act requirement. Moreover, he was one of just 14 senators who voted against -- repeat, AGAINST -- the legislation which included the waiver.

When he gave that demagogic speech, in a feigned accent and style, it was world-class chutzpah and a rhetorical triumph. He truly deserves the title Phony in Chief.

If you know any true believers in Obama, show them the transcript of his June 5, 2007, speech at Hampton University (available from the Federal News Service) and then show them page S6823 of the Congressional Record for May 24, 2007, which lists which senators voted which way on the waiver of the Stafford Act requirement for New Orleans.

Some people in the media have tried to dismiss this and other revelations of Barack Obama's real character that have belatedly come to light as "old news." But the truth is one thing that never wears out. The Pythagorean Theorem is 2,000 years old, but it can still tell you the distance from home plate to second base (127 ft.) without measuring it. And what happened five years ago can tell a lot about Barack Obama's character -- or lack of character.

Obama's true believers may not want to know the truth. But there are millions of other people who have simply projected their own desires for a post-racial America onto Barack Obama. These are the ones who need to be confronted with the truth, before they repeat the mistake they made when they voted four years ago.

[billy.pilgrim]

it must really be tough trying to rationalize voting for a draft dodging, pro-life, tax cheat who has held every side of every issue

[Bungalow Bill]

Sowell is sort of like the black version of Foolgle, and that ain't good.

[Guest]

Once again the lib response to the post ignores the content of what is said and feebly attack the author and the subject's opponent.

[Guest]

Looks like there's more than one phony in the Obama camp.

Obama's Top Pollster: Polls Don't Matter

"His view may have something – or perhaps everything – to do with the fact that Mitt Romney has pretty much eliminated President Barack Obama’s lead in the polls since last Wednesday’s debate."

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/obama- ... de=105AA-1

[Colonel Taylor]

Liberals are funny. For months now every liberal cable network has been quoting polls, now that Romney is ahead in Fl. by 4 points I think I heard today and even or up in Ohio the tone has changed to polls don't matter. And then when they do show the polls they are explaining them to a T for 5 minutes as to how they could be wrong.

[Guest]

Liberals are funny. For months now every liberal cable network has been quoting polls, now that Romney is ahead in Fl. by 4 points I think I heard today and even or up in Ohio the tone has changed to polls don't matter. And then when they do show the polls they are explaining them to a T for 5 minutes as to how they could be wrong.

Right. When the polls are in their favor, the Demoflaps are beside themselves; their numbers drop, and suddenly
"polls aren't all that important anyway".

(nice little doo-jiggers there, Banni.)

[Bungalow Bill]

It Sowell vs. Foolgle for the title Dumbest Ph.D. in America. Sowell is such a fucking idiot, it's
rather pathetic. Obama supported the waiver and voted for it when a timeline for withdrawal
from Iraq was part of the bill. When it wasn't, he voted against it, as it was obvious it had plenty
of votes to pass. But did Shitwell bring that up? Nope, he never mentioned it. Either he was
such a moron he didn't realize it, or he was such a liar he didn't mention it on purpose. Either
way he is one nitwit wingnut. Advantage Shitwell. Hilarious.