Hopefully I didn't muck the options up this time.

Thanks for your input.
k9nanny wrote:As fun as it is to play Guess the Libturd, I think Sybil should have to register.
Idiot. It's only cons who are too wussy to register. May be they think Banni is going to give their information to Obama's gun confiscation troops.Winger wrote:k9nanny wrote:As fun as it is to play Guess the Libturd, I think Sybil should have to register.
k9nanny wrote:Idiot. It's only cons who are too wussy to register. May be they think Banni is going to give their information to Obama's gun confiscation troops.Winger wrote:k9nanny wrote:As fun as it is to play Guess the Libturd, I think Sybil should have to register.
Keep your paranoia that's fine. No one is forced to post here, and no one has been prevented from posting. Do you see Vrede everywhere? I'd go see a psychologist about that.Guest wrote:No Censorship, no rules, free speech eh? El crappo!!!!
Just think how many ID's could be eliminated if Vrede was a guest?
k9 was getting her a** wacked again so she has to turn to her lib friends for relief because there's no place else to go.
You're full of bullshit.k9nanny wrote:Idiot. It's only cons who are too wussy to register.
I am for voter picture ID and I am for proper names to post. Names with board having the ability to verify by phone or address just like letters to the editor.NonUser wrote:Just look at it as another way to demonstrate right-wing hypocrisy.
They claim Voter ID is a good thing in that it doesn't stop the individual from voting but does prevent voter fraud (it doesn't but for the sake of argument let's say it does) .
Insisting on a Login Name (an ID) doesn't stop or censor anyone's post (stop them from voting) but it would prevent cowards from posting.
I say No Account=No Post.
Maybe it isn't the smartest thing to do, but as far as I know, I am the only one on this forum using his real name.Tertius wrote:I am for voter picture ID and I am for proper names to post. Names with board having the ability to verify by phone or address just like letters to the editor.NonUser wrote:Just look at it as another way to demonstrate right-wing hypocrisy.
They claim Voter ID is a good thing in that it doesn't stop the individual from voting but does prevent voter fraud (it doesn't but for the sake of argument let's say it does) .
Insisting on a Login Name (an ID) doesn't stop or censor anyone's post (stop them from voting) but it would prevent cowards from posting.
I say No Account=No Post.
Who could it be?WKJMV57 wrote:Somebody on this forum doesn't know their left from their right.
I'm using my real name. I don't live around here anyway.Wneglia wrote: Maybe it isn't the smartest thing to do, but as far as I know, I am the only one on this forum using his real name.
Voting for this country's leaders and having to post your real name to run your mouth is two different things.Tertius wrote: I am for voter picture ID and I am for proper names to post. Names with board having the ability to verify by phone or address just like letters to the editor.
What's the difference in a "coward" with a logged-in screen name and a "coward" with an unlogged-in screen name? Look back in earlier posts in this thread; you'll see a registered "Guest" and a non-registered "Guest". Which is the coward?NonUser wrote: Insisting on a Login Name (an ID) doesn't stop or censor any one's post (stop them from voting) but it would prevent cowards from posting. I say No Account=No Post.
I am a radiation oncologist and practice in Columbia, SC. I am a part time resident of H'ville and I'm in the phone book.neoplacebo wrote:Well, you're not in the phone book because I tried to look you up to see what sort of doctor you are....
I believe you just fixed his cancer of the mouth.Wneglia wrote:I am a radiation oncologist and practice in Columbia, SC. I am a part time resident of H'ville and I'm in the phone book.neoplacebo wrote:Well, you're not in the phone book because I tried to look you up to see what sort of doctor you are....