Guest wrote:No Censorship, no rules, free speech eh? El crappo!!!!
Just think how many ID's could be eliminated if Vrede was a guest?
k9 was getting her a** wacked again so she has to turn to her lib friends for relief because there's no place else to go.
Keep your paranoia that's fine. No one is forced to post here, and no one has been prevented from posting. Do you see Vrede everywhere? I'd go see a psychologist about that.
I voted to disable it just now....after all, to post on the original forum, you had to log in. Besides, nothing would prevent you from naming yourself "guest." Oh, and posting under anothers id is not just bullshit; it's cowardice....something Zimmerman would do.
I voted no because it might get a "passer-by" interested enough to register. Why not limit it to 3 from the same IP address? Surely you people of superior intelligence can do that.
Just look at it as another way to demonstrate right-wing hypocrisy.
They claim Voter ID is a good thing in that it doesn't stop the individual from votingbut does prevent voter fraud (it doesn't but for the sake of argument let's say it does) .
Insisting on a Login Name (an ID) doesn't stop or censor anyone's post (stop them from voting) but it would prevent cowards from posting.
NonUser wrote:Just look at it as another way to demonstrate right-wing hypocrisy.
They claim Voter ID is a good thing in that it doesn't stop the individual from votingbut does prevent voter fraud (it doesn't but for the sake of argument let's say it does) .
Insisting on a Login Name (an ID) doesn't stop or censor anyone's post (stop them from voting) but it would prevent cowards from posting.
I say No Account=No Post.
I am for voter picture ID and I am for proper names to post. Names with board having the ability to verify by phone or address just like letters to the editor.
NonUser wrote:Just look at it as another way to demonstrate right-wing hypocrisy.
They claim Voter ID is a good thing in that it doesn't stop the individual from votingbut does prevent voter fraud (it doesn't but for the sake of argument let's say it does) .
Insisting on a Login Name (an ID) doesn't stop or censor anyone's post (stop them from voting) but it would prevent cowards from posting.
I say No Account=No Post.
I am for voter picture ID and I am for proper names to post. Names with board having the ability to verify by phone or address just like letters to the editor.
Maybe it isn't the smartest thing to do, but as far as I know, I am the only one on this forum using his real name.
Wneglia wrote:
Maybe it isn't the smartest thing to do, but as far as I know, I am the only one on this forum using his real name.
I'm using my real name. I don't live around here anyway.
Tertius wrote: I am for voter picture ID and I am for proper names to post. Names with board having the ability to verify by phone or address just like letters to the editor.
Voting for this country's leaders and having to post your real name to run your mouth is two different things.
Like many others, I abandoned my land line for a cell phone. Cell phones aren't listed in directories.
NonUser wrote: Insisting on a Login Name (an ID) doesn't stop or censor any one's post (stop them from voting) but it would prevent cowards from posting. I say No Account=No Post.
What's the difference in a "coward" with a logged-in screen name and a "coward" with an unlogged-in screen name? Look back in earlier posts in this thread; you'll see a registered "Guest" and a non-registered "Guest". Which is the coward?
Your name is NonUser; does that mean you're a coward to post any other nonsensical "handle"?
I don't care who a poster is IRL, but the minimum ante to play ought to be to register and pick a pretend name so we all have a character. I have no idea if Nascar and the Detective are as psychotic and ignorant as their online persona, or if they're just playing a role. I generally suspect the latter. But I don't care, it's still fun. "Guest" on the other hand, is like somebody talking to their TV.