Got that noise right.
Sotomayor is not wrong, these Supremes are extreme, partisan and incompetent.
Historic.
Nice legacy Roberts.
Supreme Court's liberal justices warn of 'law-free zone' stemming from Trump immunity ruling
Got that noise right.
Another take on it:GoCubsGo wrote: ↑Mon Jul 01, 2024 11:16 amAnd throw trump in Gitmo.Vrede too wrote: ↑Mon Jul 01, 2024 11:03 am
US Supreme Court rules Trump has immunity for official, not private acts
Joe should go shoot 6 justices and call it an "official act".![]()
They've effectively given trump cover to avoid trial for the immediate future.
This country is fucked.
LOLVrede too wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:22 am
Another take on it:
Opinion
The Supreme Court just did Biden a huge favor by giving Trump immunity
![]()
![]()
She can make credible cases for impeaching Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito. Floor votes might be useful in purple districts.GoCubsGo wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:31 amThis is as much of a reach as mtgreene's impeachment motions against Biden, but I'm still glad and hoping she follows through. Hope she at least gets some dem sponsors and endorsements.
Ocasio-Cortez vows to file impeachment articles against Supreme Court justices
Wonder if she can force a floor vote like boebert did on impeachment.Vrede too wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:37 amShe can make credible cases for impeaching Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito. Floor votes might be useful in purple districts.GoCubsGo wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:31 amThis is as much of a reach as mtgreene's impeachment motions against Biden, but I'm still glad and hoping she follows through. Hope she at least gets some dem sponsors and endorsements.
Ocasio-Cortez vows to file impeachment articles against Supreme Court justices
More....
Saw online:
The vote was 6-3.GoCubsGo wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 2:17 pmhttps://x.com/AccountableGOP/status/1808191057236000975GoCubsGo wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 12:24 pmMore....GoCubsGo wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 9:28 amThey see no incongruities and odds are they'll never have to explain themselves.
https://x.com/AdamKinzinger/status/1808112076914581536
https://x.com/AccountableGOP/status/1807855254006124944
https://x.com/DavidCornDC/status/1808128402148200809
Don't know if they're 'haunted'. The RW liars probably don't care.Five SCOTUS Justices’ Comments on Prez Immunity Come Back to Haunt Them
... Presidential pardons, Youngstown (Sheet and Tube) and presidential immunity were not discussed in Clarence Thomas’ confirmation hearing.
'Haunted' makes the assumption they have a conscience.Vrede too wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 6:08 pm
The vote was 6-3.Don't know if they're 'haunted'. The RW liars probably don't care.Five SCOTUS Justices’ Comments on Prez Immunity Come Back to Haunt Them
... Presidential pardons, Youngstown (Sheet and Tube) and presidential immunity were not discussed in Clarence Thomas’ confirmation hearing.
Vrede too wrote: ↑Mon Jul 01, 2024 11:03 am
US Supreme Court rules Trump has immunity for official, not private acts
Joe should go shoot 6 justices and call it an "official act".
GoCubsGo wrote: ↑Wed Jul 03, 2024 12:34 amThis is an interesting take, the Supremes in addition to upending presidential immunity granted themselves additional power as final arbiters of what is a presidential crimes as well.
Quite the power grab and upends checks and balances.
https://substack.com/home/post/p-146195634
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heather_Cox_Richardson
... Legal analyst Joyce White Vance noted that a president with such broad immunity could order the assassination of Supreme Court justices, and retired military leader Mark Hertling wrote that he was “trying to figure out how a commander can refuse an illegal order from someone who is issuing it as an official act.”...
Supreme Court turns away OSHA challenge over opposition from Thomas, Gorsuch
Over opposition from two conservative justices, the Supreme Court on Tuesday turned away a challenge that could’ve gutted the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA).
An Ohio-based construction contractor backed by Republican-led states and anti-regulatory interests contended Congress unconstitutionally delegated its legislative powers to the executive branch when it gave such broad authority to the agency, which sets and enforces workplace standards.
In a brief order, the court declined to take up the contractor’s appeal after a lower court rejected the challenge.
Conservative Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch publicly indicated they would’ve taken up the case, but at least four votes were needed....
What a bizarre bunch, how do they reconcile OSHA versus last week's Chevron ruling?Vrede too wrote: ↑Wed Jul 03, 2024 11:25 am
Rare action to applaud:Supreme Court turns away OSHA challenge over opposition from Thomas, Gorsuch
Over opposition from two conservative justices, the Supreme Court on Tuesday turned away a challenge that could’ve gutted the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA).
An Ohio-based construction contractor backed by Republican-led states and anti-regulatory interests contended Congress unconstitutionally delegated its legislative powers to the executive branch when it gave such broad authority to the agency, which sets and enforces workplace standards.
In a brief order, the court declined to take up the contractor’s appeal after a lower court rejected the challenge.
Conservative Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch publicly indicated they would’ve taken up the case, but at least four votes were needed....![]()