
Iran War
-
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 2338
- Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2019 8:07 pm
Re: Iran War
Yours is the Tennessee Holler & Bluesky. If only the Iranians used them as a source.GoCubsGo wrote: ↑Sun Jun 22, 2025 8:25 amLOLSupsalemgr wrote: ↑Sun Jun 22, 2025 8:15 amPlease share with us the sources you have to dismiss what I posted. When you see what we need to now It would be nice of you to share with us.GoCubsGo wrote: ↑Sun Jun 22, 2025 7:50 amWhat and who's reports? Please don't say DonOld or Fox News. Neither have credibility.Supsalemgr wrote: ↑Sun Jun 22, 2025 6:33 amBased on all the reports Iran has been defeated militarily and that was one objective. Be assured, Iran has plenty of followers and "sleeper cells" around the world. These will be heard from in the future. Hopefully, the Iranian people will take out the current leadership and the new leadership will change direction.
There's zero credible intelligence information available immediately after a strike like that. Satellites aren't going to tell us what what we need to know.
The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs just confirmed it.
"They are severely damaged but don't know if destroyed. It will take some time for a battle assessment."
Now tell us your sources.
What and who are "all the reports?"

811
- neoplacebo
- Admiral of the Fleet
- Posts: 12548
- Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 1:42 pm
- Location: Kingsport TN
Re: Iran War
He already listed Sean Hannity. Guess he's waiting for Jesse Watters for real confirmation.GoCubsGo wrote: ↑Sun Jun 22, 2025 8:25 amLOLSupsalemgr wrote: ↑Sun Jun 22, 2025 8:15 amPlease share with us the sources you have to dismiss what I posted. When you see what we need to now It would be nice of you to share with us.GoCubsGo wrote: ↑Sun Jun 22, 2025 7:50 amWhat and who's reports? Please don't say DonOld or Fox News. Neither have credibility.Supsalemgr wrote: ↑Sun Jun 22, 2025 6:33 amBased on all the reports Iran has been defeated militarily and that was one objective. Be assured, Iran has plenty of followers and "sleeper cells" around the world. These will be heard from in the future. Hopefully, the Iranian people will take out the current leadership and the new leadership will change direction.
There's zero credible intelligence information available immediately after a strike like that. Satellites aren't going to tell us what what we need to know.
The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs just confirmed it.
"They are severely damaged but don't know if destroyed. It will take some time for a battle assessment."
Now tell us your sources.
What and who are "all the reports?"
- neoplacebo
- Admiral of the Fleet
- Posts: 12548
- Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 1:42 pm
- Location: Kingsport TN
Re: Iran War
I find it strange that trump and the magats pretty much ignore North Korea, in spite of the fact that they already have nukes and have threatened numerous times to use them on us. Seems like just another case of the Isreali tail wagging the American dog.
-
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 2338
- Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2019 8:07 pm
Re: Iran War
Maybe you should go over there with your cellphone and that Naval training and report back.neoplacebo wrote: ↑Sun Jun 22, 2025 8:48 amHe already listed Sean Hannity. Guess he's waiting for Jesse Watters for real confirmation.GoCubsGo wrote: ↑Sun Jun 22, 2025 8:25 amLOLSupsalemgr wrote: ↑Sun Jun 22, 2025 8:15 amPlease share with us the sources you have to dismiss what I posted. When you see what we need to now It would be nice of you to share with us.GoCubsGo wrote: ↑Sun Jun 22, 2025 7:50 amWhat and who's reports? Please don't say DonOld or Fox News. Neither have credibility.Supsalemgr wrote: ↑Sun Jun 22, 2025 6:33 amBased on all the reports Iran has been defeated militarily and that was one objective. Be assured, Iran has plenty of followers and "sleeper cells" around the world. These will be heard from in the future. Hopefully, the Iranian people will take out the current leadership and the new leadership will change direction.
There's zero credible intelligence information available immediately after a strike like that. Satellites aren't going to tell us what what we need to know.
The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs just confirmed it.
"They are severely damaged but don't know if destroyed. It will take some time for a battle assessment."
Now tell us your sources.
What and who are "all the reports?"
811
- Vrede too
- Superstar Cultmaster
- Posts: 58128
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:46 am
- Location: Hendersonville, NC
Re: Iran War


neoplacebo wrote: ↑Sun Jun 22, 2025 8:48 amHe already listed Sean Hannity. Guess he's waiting for Jesse Watters for real confirmation.

Funny, seems to me that war and the threat of war has always strengthened the mullahs vs the Irani people. I wonder why it would be different this time.

F' ELON
and the
FELON
1312. ETTD. 86 47.
and the
FELON
1312. ETTD. 86 47.
-
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 2338
- Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2019 8:07 pm
- GoCubsGo
- Admiral
- Posts: 22334
- Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 2:22 am
Re: Iran War
I'm shocked that Supes hasn't returned to defend his assertion.Vrede too wrote: ↑Sun Jun 22, 2025 9:17 am
Nice citation.
neoplacebo wrote: ↑Sun Jun 22, 2025 8:48 amHe already listed Sean Hannity. Guess he's waiting for Jesse Watters for real confirmation.WingNutDaily, the alternative "news" source.
Funny, seems to me that war and the threat of war has always strengthened the mullahs vs the Irani people. I wonder why it would be different this time.![]()

Eamus Catuli~AC 000000 000101 010202 020303 010304 020405....Ahhhh, forget it, it's gonna be a while.
Foxtrot
Delta
Tango
Foxtrot
Delta
Tango
-
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 2338
- Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2019 8:07 pm
- GoCubsGo
- Admiral
- Posts: 22334
- Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 2:22 am
Re: Iran War
Oops.
Eamus Catuli~AC 000000 000101 010202 020303 010304 020405....Ahhhh, forget it, it's gonna be a while.
Foxtrot
Delta
Tango
Foxtrot
Delta
Tango
- GoCubsGo
- Admiral
- Posts: 22334
- Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 2:22 am
Re: Iran War
Good news!
Eamus Catuli~AC 000000 000101 010202 020303 010304 020405....Ahhhh, forget it, it's gonna be a while.
Foxtrot
Delta
Tango
Foxtrot
Delta
Tango
-
- Midshipman
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 6:39 pm
Re: Iran War
Reports I heard and saw were from ABC, Fox and the AJC. Two of the three are certainly not considered conservative. Pay attention. I posted about "militarily" defeated. Iran has no way to respond and has no air defense capability.GoCubsGo wrote: ↑Sun Jun 22, 2025 8:25 amLOLSupsalemgr wrote: ↑Sun Jun 22, 2025 8:15 amPlease share with us the sources you have to dismiss what I posted. When you see what we need to now It would be nice of you to share with us.GoCubsGo wrote: ↑Sun Jun 22, 2025 7:50 amWhat and who's reports? Please don't say DonOld or Fox News. Neither have credibility.Supsalemgr wrote: ↑Sun Jun 22, 2025 6:33 amBased on all the reports Iran has been defeated militarily and that was one objective. Be assured, Iran has plenty of followers and "sleeper cells" around the world. These will be heard from in the future. Hopefully, the Iranian people will take out the current leadership and the new leadership will change direction.
There's zero credible intelligence information available immediately after a strike like that. Satellites aren't going to tell us what what we need to know.
The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs just confirmed it.
"They are severely damaged but don't know if destroyed. It will take some time for a battle assessment."
Now tell us your sources.
What and who are "all the reports?"
-
- Captain
- Posts: 5605
- Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:58 am
- Location: Hendersonville
- Contact:
Re: Iran War
I have serious doubts that they've been set back. I predicted the attack 8 hours in advance. Iran predicted the attack a LONG time in advance. These facilities were already emptied.
Our own government says they weren't trying to build weapons.
Things do not add up.
- O Really
- Admiral
- Posts: 23340
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm
Re: Iran War
"militarily defeated" reminds me of something we've heard in the past. I think it was "Mission Accomplished". I don't know what everybody thought Iran was going to do with a nuclear bomb. They may wear funny suits and but they're not stupid people. More likely they'd recognize what everybody else with a nuclear bomb has known for decades - it's only any good if you don't use it, because if you actually use it, you've got mutually assured destruction (yes, that's "MAD").
-
- Captain
- Posts: 5605
- Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:58 am
- Location: Hendersonville
- Contact:
Re: Iran War
Spot on.O Really wrote: ↑Sun Jun 22, 2025 11:35 am"militarily defeated" reminds me of something we've heard in the past. I think it was "Mission Accomplished". I don't know what everybody thought Iran was going to do with a nuclear bomb. They may wear funny suits and but they're not stupid people. More likely they'd recognize what everybody else with a nuclear bomb has known for decades - it's only any good if you don't use it, because if you actually use it, you've got mutually assured destruction (yes, that's "MAD").
-
- Captain
- Posts: 5605
- Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:58 am
- Location: Hendersonville
- Contact:
Re: Iran War
Iran responded within hours of our attack. What are you talking about?Supsalemgr wrote: ↑Sun Jun 22, 2025 11:05 amReports I heard and saw were from ABC, Fox and the AJC. Two of the three are certainly not considered conservative. Pay attention. I posted about "militarily" defeated. Iran has no way to respond and has no air defense capability.GoCubsGo wrote: ↑Sun Jun 22, 2025 8:25 amLOLSupsalemgr wrote: ↑Sun Jun 22, 2025 8:15 amPlease share with us the sources you have to dismiss what I posted. When you see what we need to now It would be nice of you to share with us.GoCubsGo wrote: ↑Sun Jun 22, 2025 7:50 amWhat and who's reports? Please don't say DonOld or Fox News. Neither have credibility.Supsalemgr wrote: ↑Sun Jun 22, 2025 6:33 amBased on all the reports Iran has been defeated militarily and that was one objective. Be assured, Iran has plenty of followers and "sleeper cells" around the world. These will be heard from in the future. Hopefully, the Iranian people will take out the current leadership and the new leadership will change direction.
There's zero credible intelligence information available immediately after a strike like that. Satellites aren't going to tell us what what we need to know.
The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs just confirmed it.
"They are severely damaged but don't know if destroyed. It will take some time for a battle assessment."
Now tell us your sources.
What and who are "all the reports?"
- GoCubsGo
- Admiral
- Posts: 22334
- Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 2:22 am
Re: Iran War
I'm sure you can readily provide a link to those reportsSupsalemgr wrote: ↑Sun Jun 22, 2025 11:05 am
Reports I heard and saw were from ABC, Fox and the AJC. Two of the three are certainly not considered conservative. Pay attention. I posted about "militarily" defeated. Iran has no way to respond and has no air defense capability.

Iran was militarily defeated by Israel days ago.
Speaking of reports I've heard too, there was no radiation detected around the sites (something that can be confirmed without boots on the ground), suggesting that as Banni said the sites were already evacuated or the mission was not successful.
So much for totally obliterated as the Chickenhawk in Chief claimed last night.
Eamus Catuli~AC 000000 000101 010202 020303 010304 020405....Ahhhh, forget it, it's gonna be a while.
Foxtrot
Delta
Tango
Foxtrot
Delta
Tango
-
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 2338
- Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2019 8:07 pm
Re: Iran War
The Tennessee Holler & Bluesky?GoCubsGo wrote: ↑Sun Jun 22, 2025 12:19 pmI'm sure you can readily provide a link to those reportsSupsalemgr wrote: ↑Sun Jun 22, 2025 11:05 am
Reports I heard and saw were from ABC, Fox and the AJC. Two of the three are certainly not considered conservative. Pay attention. I posted about "militarily" defeated. Iran has no way to respond and has no air defense capability..
Iran was militarily defeated by Israel days ago.
Speaking of reports I've heard too, there was no radiation detected around the sites (something that can be confirmed without boots on the ground), suggesting that as Banni said the sites were already evacuated or the mission was not successful.

"Predicted"

811
-
- Midshipman
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 6:39 pm
Re: Iran War
I will just say O Really has more faith in the Iranian leadership than I do.O Really wrote: ↑Sun Jun 22, 2025 11:35 am"militarily defeated" reminds me of something we've heard in the past. I think it was "Mission Accomplished". I don't know what everybody thought Iran was going to do with a nuclear bomb. They may wear funny suits and but they're not stupid people. More likely they'd recognize what everybody else with a nuclear bomb has known for decades - it's only any good if you don't use it, because if you actually use it, you've got mutually assured destruction (yes, that's "MAD").
-
- Midshipman
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 6:39 pm
Re: Iran War
Sorry I missed the response. What was it?bannination wrote: ↑Sun Jun 22, 2025 11:56 amIran responded within hours of our attack. What are you talking about?Supsalemgr wrote: ↑Sun Jun 22, 2025 11:05 amReports I heard and saw were from ABC, Fox and the AJC. Two of the three are certainly not considered conservative. Pay attention. I posted about "militarily" defeated. Iran has no way to respond and has no air defense capability.GoCubsGo wrote: ↑Sun Jun 22, 2025 8:25 amLOLSupsalemgr wrote: ↑Sun Jun 22, 2025 8:15 amPlease share with us the sources you have to dismiss what I posted. When you see what we need to now It would be nice of you to share with us.
The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs just confirmed it.
"They are severely damaged but don't know if destroyed. It will take some time for a battle assessment."
Now tell us your sources.
What and who are "all the reports?"