Iran War

Generally an unmoderated forum for discussion of pretty much any topic. The focus however, is usually politics.
Post Reply
User avatar
Whack9
Captain
Posts: 4489
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2018 12:31 pm

Re: Iran War

Unread post by Whack9 »

Maga right now:

Image

1 CAT FAN
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 2337
Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2019 8:07 pm

Re: Iran War

Unread post by 1 CAT FAN »

GoCubsGo wrote:
Sun Jun 22, 2025 8:25 am
Supsalemgr wrote:
Sun Jun 22, 2025 8:15 am
GoCubsGo wrote:
Sun Jun 22, 2025 7:50 am
Supsalemgr wrote:
Sun Jun 22, 2025 6:33 am
Based on all the reports Iran has been defeated militarily and that was one objective. Be assured, Iran has plenty of followers and "sleeper cells" around the world. These will be heard from in the future. Hopefully, the Iranian people will take out the current leadership and the new leadership will change direction.
What and who's reports? Please don't say DonOld or Fox News. Neither have credibility.

There's zero credible intelligence information available immediately after a strike like that. Satellites aren't going to tell us what what we need to know.
Please share with us the sources you have to dismiss what I posted. When you see what we need to now It would be nice of you to share with us.
LOL

The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs just confirmed it.

"They are severely damaged but don't know if destroyed. It will take some time for a battle assessment."

Now tell us your sources.

What and who are "all the reports?"
Yours is the Tennessee Holler & Bluesky. If only the Iranians used them as a source. :lol:
811

User avatar
neoplacebo
Admiral of the Fleet
Posts: 12548
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 1:42 pm
Location: Kingsport TN

Re: Iran War

Unread post by neoplacebo »

GoCubsGo wrote:
Sun Jun 22, 2025 8:25 am
Supsalemgr wrote:
Sun Jun 22, 2025 8:15 am
GoCubsGo wrote:
Sun Jun 22, 2025 7:50 am
Supsalemgr wrote:
Sun Jun 22, 2025 6:33 am
Based on all the reports Iran has been defeated militarily and that was one objective. Be assured, Iran has plenty of followers and "sleeper cells" around the world. These will be heard from in the future. Hopefully, the Iranian people will take out the current leadership and the new leadership will change direction.
What and who's reports? Please don't say DonOld or Fox News. Neither have credibility.

There's zero credible intelligence information available immediately after a strike like that. Satellites aren't going to tell us what what we need to know.
Please share with us the sources you have to dismiss what I posted. When you see what we need to now It would be nice of you to share with us.
LOL

The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs just confirmed it.

"They are severely damaged but don't know if destroyed. It will take some time for a battle assessment."

Now tell us your sources.

What and who are "all the reports?"
He already listed Sean Hannity. Guess he's waiting for Jesse Watters for real confirmation.

User avatar
neoplacebo
Admiral of the Fleet
Posts: 12548
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 1:42 pm
Location: Kingsport TN

Re: Iran War

Unread post by neoplacebo »

I find it strange that trump and the magats pretty much ignore North Korea, in spite of the fact that they already have nukes and have threatened numerous times to use them on us. Seems like just another case of the Isreali tail wagging the American dog.

1 CAT FAN
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 2337
Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2019 8:07 pm

Re: Iran War

Unread post by 1 CAT FAN »

neoplacebo wrote:
Sun Jun 22, 2025 8:48 am
GoCubsGo wrote:
Sun Jun 22, 2025 8:25 am
Supsalemgr wrote:
Sun Jun 22, 2025 8:15 am
GoCubsGo wrote:
Sun Jun 22, 2025 7:50 am
Supsalemgr wrote:
Sun Jun 22, 2025 6:33 am
Based on all the reports Iran has been defeated militarily and that was one objective. Be assured, Iran has plenty of followers and "sleeper cells" around the world. These will be heard from in the future. Hopefully, the Iranian people will take out the current leadership and the new leadership will change direction.
What and who's reports? Please don't say DonOld or Fox News. Neither have credibility.

There's zero credible intelligence information available immediately after a strike like that. Satellites aren't going to tell us what what we need to know.
Please share with us the sources you have to dismiss what I posted. When you see what we need to now It would be nice of you to share with us.
LOL

The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs just confirmed it.

"They are severely damaged but don't know if destroyed. It will take some time for a battle assessment."

Now tell us your sources.

What and who are "all the reports?"
He already listed Sean Hannity. Guess he's waiting for Jesse Watters for real confirmation.
Maybe you should go over there with your cellphone and that Naval training and report back.
811

User avatar
Vrede too
Superstar Cultmaster
Posts: 58128
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:46 am
Location: Hendersonville, NC

Re: Iran War

Unread post by Vrede too »

GoCubsGo wrote:
Sun Jun 22, 2025 8:25 am
GoCubsGo wrote:
Sun Jun 22, 2025 7:50 am
What and who's reports? Please don't say DonOld or Fox News. Neither have credibility.

There's zero credible intelligence information available immediately after a strike like that. Satellites aren't going to tell us what what we need to know.
LOL

The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs just confirmed it.

"They are severely damaged but don't know if destroyed. It will take some time for a battle assessment."

Now tell us your sources.

What and who are "all the reports?"
:lol: Nice citation. :---P
neoplacebo wrote:
Sun Jun 22, 2025 8:48 am
He already listed Sean Hannity. Guess he's waiting for Jesse Watters for real confirmation.
:D WingNutDaily, the alternative "news" source.

Funny, seems to me that war and the threat of war has always strengthened the mullahs vs the Irani people. I wonder why it would be different this time. :headscratch:
F' ELON
and the
FELON

1312. ETTD. 86 47.

1 CAT FAN
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 2337
Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2019 8:07 pm

Re: Iran War

Unread post by 1 CAT FAN »

A "Rainbow" goat journalist would be a huge hit in Iran. :lol:
811

User avatar
GoCubsGo
Admiral
Posts: 22334
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 2:22 am

Re: Iran War

Unread post by GoCubsGo »

Vrede too wrote:
Sun Jun 22, 2025 9:17 am

:lol: Nice citation. :---P
neoplacebo wrote:
Sun Jun 22, 2025 8:48 am
He already listed Sean Hannity. Guess he's waiting for Jesse Watters for real confirmation.
:D WingNutDaily, the alternative "news" source.

Funny, seems to me that war and the threat of war has always strengthened the mullahs vs the Irani people. I wonder why it would be different this time. :headscratch:
I'm shocked that Supes hasn't returned to defend his assertion. :roll:
Eamus Catuli~AC 000000 000101 010202 020303 010304 020405....Ahhhh, forget it, it's gonna be a while.


Foxtrot
Delta
Tango

1 CAT FAN
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 2337
Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2019 8:07 pm

Re: Iran War

Unread post by 1 CAT FAN »

Waiting for another Tennessee Holler report. :lol:
811

User avatar
GoCubsGo
Admiral
Posts: 22334
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 2:22 am

Re: Iran War

Unread post by GoCubsGo »

Oops.



Eamus Catuli~AC 000000 000101 010202 020303 010304 020405....Ahhhh, forget it, it's gonna be a while.


Foxtrot
Delta
Tango

User avatar
GoCubsGo
Admiral
Posts: 22334
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 2:22 am

Re: Iran War

Unread post by GoCubsGo »

Good news!

Eamus Catuli~AC 000000 000101 010202 020303 010304 020405....Ahhhh, forget it, it's gonna be a while.


Foxtrot
Delta
Tango

Supsalemgr
Midshipman
Posts: 1009
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 6:39 pm

Re: Iran War

Unread post by Supsalemgr »

GoCubsGo wrote:
Sun Jun 22, 2025 8:25 am
Supsalemgr wrote:
Sun Jun 22, 2025 8:15 am
GoCubsGo wrote:
Sun Jun 22, 2025 7:50 am
Supsalemgr wrote:
Sun Jun 22, 2025 6:33 am
Based on all the reports Iran has been defeated militarily and that was one objective. Be assured, Iran has plenty of followers and "sleeper cells" around the world. These will be heard from in the future. Hopefully, the Iranian people will take out the current leadership and the new leadership will change direction.
What and who's reports? Please don't say DonOld or Fox News. Neither have credibility.

There's zero credible intelligence information available immediately after a strike like that. Satellites aren't going to tell us what what we need to know.
Please share with us the sources you have to dismiss what I posted. When you see what we need to now It would be nice of you to share with us.
LOL

The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs just confirmed it.

"They are severely damaged but don't know if destroyed. It will take some time for a battle assessment."

Now tell us your sources.

What and who are "all the reports?"
Reports I heard and saw were from ABC, Fox and the AJC. Two of the three are certainly not considered conservative. Pay attention. I posted about "militarily" defeated. Iran has no way to respond and has no air defense capability.

bannination
Captain
Posts: 5605
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:58 am
Location: Hendersonville
Contact:

Re: Iran War

Unread post by bannination »

Jasmine wrote:
Sat Jun 21, 2025 11:36 pm
Are you guys upset that Iran’s nuke ambitions have been set back?

In my view, this isn’t enough. Nuclear programs can be rebuilt. We need to kill all the people who have the ability to build them. Otherwise, it’s a never ending cycle.

I have serious doubts that they've been set back. I predicted the attack 8 hours in advance. Iran predicted the attack a LONG time in advance. These facilities were already emptied.

Our own government says they weren't trying to build weapons.

Things do not add up.

User avatar
O Really
Admiral
Posts: 23340
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm

Re: Iran War

Unread post by O Really »

"militarily defeated" reminds me of something we've heard in the past. I think it was "Mission Accomplished". I don't know what everybody thought Iran was going to do with a nuclear bomb. They may wear funny suits and but they're not stupid people. More likely they'd recognize what everybody else with a nuclear bomb has known for decades - it's only any good if you don't use it, because if you actually use it, you've got mutually assured destruction (yes, that's "MAD").

bannination
Captain
Posts: 5605
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:58 am
Location: Hendersonville
Contact:

Re: Iran War

Unread post by bannination »

O Really wrote:
Sun Jun 22, 2025 11:35 am
"militarily defeated" reminds me of something we've heard in the past. I think it was "Mission Accomplished". I don't know what everybody thought Iran was going to do with a nuclear bomb. They may wear funny suits and but they're not stupid people. More likely they'd recognize what everybody else with a nuclear bomb has known for decades - it's only any good if you don't use it, because if you actually use it, you've got mutually assured destruction (yes, that's "MAD").
Spot on.

Image

bannination
Captain
Posts: 5605
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:58 am
Location: Hendersonville
Contact:

Re: Iran War

Unread post by bannination »

Supsalemgr wrote:
Sun Jun 22, 2025 11:05 am
GoCubsGo wrote:
Sun Jun 22, 2025 8:25 am
Supsalemgr wrote:
Sun Jun 22, 2025 8:15 am
GoCubsGo wrote:
Sun Jun 22, 2025 7:50 am
Supsalemgr wrote:
Sun Jun 22, 2025 6:33 am
Based on all the reports Iran has been defeated militarily and that was one objective. Be assured, Iran has plenty of followers and "sleeper cells" around the world. These will be heard from in the future. Hopefully, the Iranian people will take out the current leadership and the new leadership will change direction.
What and who's reports? Please don't say DonOld or Fox News. Neither have credibility.

There's zero credible intelligence information available immediately after a strike like that. Satellites aren't going to tell us what what we need to know.
Please share with us the sources you have to dismiss what I posted. When you see what we need to now It would be nice of you to share with us.
LOL

The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs just confirmed it.

"They are severely damaged but don't know if destroyed. It will take some time for a battle assessment."

Now tell us your sources.

What and who are "all the reports?"
Reports I heard and saw were from ABC, Fox and the AJC. Two of the three are certainly not considered conservative. Pay attention. I posted about "militarily" defeated. Iran has no way to respond and has no air defense capability.
Iran responded within hours of our attack. What are you talking about?

User avatar
GoCubsGo
Admiral
Posts: 22334
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 2:22 am

Re: Iran War

Unread post by GoCubsGo »

Supsalemgr wrote:
Sun Jun 22, 2025 11:05 am


Reports I heard and saw were from ABC, Fox and the AJC. Two of the three are certainly not considered conservative. Pay attention. I posted about "militarily" defeated. Iran has no way to respond and has no air defense capability.
I'm sure you can readily provide a link to those reports :roll:.

Iran was militarily defeated by Israel days ago.

Speaking of reports I've heard too, there was no radiation detected around the sites (something that can be confirmed without boots on the ground), suggesting that as Banni said the sites were already evacuated or the mission was not successful.

So much for totally obliterated as the Chickenhawk in Chief claimed last night.
Eamus Catuli~AC 000000 000101 010202 020303 010304 020405....Ahhhh, forget it, it's gonna be a while.


Foxtrot
Delta
Tango

1 CAT FAN
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 2337
Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2019 8:07 pm

Re: Iran War

Unread post by 1 CAT FAN »

GoCubsGo wrote:
Sun Jun 22, 2025 12:19 pm
Supsalemgr wrote:
Sun Jun 22, 2025 11:05 am


Reports I heard and saw were from ABC, Fox and the AJC. Two of the three are certainly not considered conservative. Pay attention. I posted about "militarily" defeated. Iran has no way to respond and has no air defense capability.
I'm sure you can readily provide a link to those reports :roll:.

Iran was militarily defeated by Israel days ago.

Speaking of reports I've heard too, there was no radiation detected around the sites (something that can be confirmed without boots on the ground), suggesting that as Banni said the sites were already evacuated or the mission was not successful.
The Tennessee Holler & Bluesky? :lol:

"Predicted" :laughing-rolling:
811

Supsalemgr
Midshipman
Posts: 1009
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 6:39 pm

Re: Iran War

Unread post by Supsalemgr »

O Really wrote:
Sun Jun 22, 2025 11:35 am
"militarily defeated" reminds me of something we've heard in the past. I think it was "Mission Accomplished". I don't know what everybody thought Iran was going to do with a nuclear bomb. They may wear funny suits and but they're not stupid people. More likely they'd recognize what everybody else with a nuclear bomb has known for decades - it's only any good if you don't use it, because if you actually use it, you've got mutually assured destruction (yes, that's "MAD").
I will just say O Really has more faith in the Iranian leadership than I do.

Supsalemgr
Midshipman
Posts: 1009
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 6:39 pm

Re: Iran War

Unread post by Supsalemgr »

bannination wrote:
Sun Jun 22, 2025 11:56 am
Supsalemgr wrote:
Sun Jun 22, 2025 11:05 am
GoCubsGo wrote:
Sun Jun 22, 2025 8:25 am
Supsalemgr wrote:
Sun Jun 22, 2025 8:15 am
GoCubsGo wrote:
Sun Jun 22, 2025 7:50 am


What and who's reports? Please don't say DonOld or Fox News. Neither have credibility.

There's zero credible intelligence information available immediately after a strike like that. Satellites aren't going to tell us what what we need to know.
Please share with us the sources you have to dismiss what I posted. When you see what we need to now It would be nice of you to share with us.
LOL

The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs just confirmed it.

"They are severely damaged but don't know if destroyed. It will take some time for a battle assessment."

Now tell us your sources.

What and who are "all the reports?"
Reports I heard and saw were from ABC, Fox and the AJC. Two of the three are certainly not considered conservative. Pay attention. I posted about "militarily" defeated. Iran has no way to respond and has no air defense capability.
Iran responded within hours of our attack. What are you talking about?
Sorry I missed the response. What was it?

Post Reply