Mad R, do you actually have a legitimate rational argument to make or are you just looking for attention?Roland Deschain wrote:Seven year old informartion is not worth spit. Get some current facts before coming back. The sad thing is you idiots spout about "saving lives" yet when 25 people get shot in a 48 hour period in one of the most stringent gun regulation areas you ignore the fact and create comparisons to deflect from the fact that increased gun regulation does not work.
Gun Legislation
- Ombudsman
- Ensign
- Posts: 1268
- Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2013 1:03 pm
Re: Gun Legislation
Wing nuts. Not just for breakfast anymore.
-
- Wing commander
- Posts: 467
- Joined: Sun May 26, 2013 11:50 am
Re: Gun Legislation
Coming from the forum troll.....LMAO. Add something to any conversation here other than your usual bull$#!t and you might gain an ounce of credibility from which to ask such a question. Until then go play on the railroad tracks and let the adults talk.Ombudsman wrote:Mad R, do you actually have a legitimate rational argument to make or are you just looking for attention?
- Ombudsman
- Ensign
- Posts: 1268
- Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2013 1:03 pm
Re: Gun Legislation
Would that be a no? Then why all the yapping, under multiple sock puppet names?
Wing nuts. Not just for breakfast anymore.
- Stinger
- Sub-Lieutenant
- Posts: 1944
- Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 10:18 pm
Re: Gun Legislation
You mean like this?Roland Deschain wrote:Until then go play on the railroad tracks and let the adults talk.
That's an adult talking?Your paranoia and obsession with other people is quite clear...as is your total inability to debate. Yep, you've made it quite clear you can take the heat....so clear in fact, you have proven yourself an idiotic moron with a juvenile mental state.
Too funny.
- Ombudsman
- Ensign
- Posts: 1268
- Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2013 1:03 pm
Re: Gun Legislation
We're clearly dealing with a person of limited thinking skills and social skills. The question is why should someone with no more sense, and no more shame, and no more self respect be given unfettered access to firearms? This guy is just a clock tower short of a full blown sniper attack.
Wing nuts. Not just for breakfast anymore.
-
- Wing commander
- Posts: 467
- Joined: Sun May 26, 2013 11:50 am
Re: Gun Legislation
Again, when you offer anything other than your normal bullshit come talk to me...until then you are the one proving yourself to be an idiotic asshole. Me thinks Leo has you pegged...it has to come naturally, being that big of an asshole would require too much effort from a shit for brains numb nut like you.Ombudsman wrote:Would that be a no? Then why all the yapping, under multiple sock puppet names?
- Ombudsman
- Ensign
- Posts: 1268
- Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2013 1:03 pm
Re: Gun Legislation
Why should you of all people be allowed to posses firearms?Roland Deschain wrote:Again, when you offer anything other than your normal bullshit come talk to me...until then you are the one proving yourself to be an idiotic asshole. Me thinks Leo has you pegged...it has to come naturally, being that big of an asshole would require too much effort from a shit for brains numb nut like you.Ombudsman wrote:Would that be a no? Then why all the yapping, under multiple sock puppet names?
Wing nuts. Not just for breakfast anymore.
-
- Wing commander
- Posts: 467
- Joined: Sun May 26, 2013 11:50 am
Re: Gun Legislation
Why not? Just because I can throw your 5th grade insults back at you is no indication of what my real mental capacity is. You would not know me if you walked past me on the street or even sat in the booth across from me in McDonalds. So again....why not?Ombudsman wrote:Why should you of all people be allowed to posses firearms?Roland Deschain wrote:Again, when you offer anything other than your normal bullshit come talk to me...until then you are the one proving yourself to be an idiotic asshole. Me thinks Leo has you pegged...it has to come naturally, being that big of an asshole would require too much effort from a shit for brains numb nut like you.Ombudsman wrote:Would that be a no? Then why all the yapping, under multiple sock puppet names?
- Ombudsman
- Ensign
- Posts: 1268
- Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2013 1:03 pm
Re: Gun Legislation
So you're so brilliant you can't think of a single reason? Think harder. I'm sure you can do it.
Wing nuts. Not just for breakfast anymore.
-
- Wing commander
- Posts: 467
- Joined: Sun May 26, 2013 11:50 am
Re: Gun Legislation
Notice the attempt at an actual conversation turned aside by yet another insult. You asked a question that requires no answer. I gave you the opportunity to explain why I should be denied the ability to own a firearm based on your vast knowledge of myself and my mental capacity from this forum. You chose more of the usual waste of bandwidth.Ombudsman wrote:So you're so brilliant you can't think of a single reason? Think harder. I'm sure you can do it.
- Ombudsman
- Ensign
- Posts: 1268
- Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2013 1:03 pm
Re: Gun Legislation
Yes you ducked my question. Can you answer it? Why should you be allowed to own firearms? It's a simple question. Can you handle it?
Wing nuts. Not just for breakfast anymore.
- O Really
- Admiral
- Posts: 23182
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm
Re: Gun Legislation
So Roland - if you don't like my broad-brush numbers, and you don't like Vrede's more detailed and specific numbers, let's see yours. Show us that NYC has higher gun violence than other more gun-friendly cities. In fact, show us any credible data that shows a positive correlation between restrictive gun laws and increased gun violence. We'll wait.
-
- Wing commander
- Posts: 467
- Joined: Sun May 26, 2013 11:50 am
Re: Gun Legislation
OK, why should I be allowed to possess firearms. I'm over 18 years of age, with a clean bill of health, no prescription meds of any kind, no criminal record of any kind, no mental health issues of any kind, and based on that information the United States Constitution allows me to. I'll go one further...why should I possess firearms? That is all a purely subjective matter basedon personal opinion and the individual purposes for various guns.Ombudsman wrote:Yes you ducked my question. Can you answer it? Why should you be allowed to own firearms? It's a simple question. Can you handle it?
Now, I answered your question...answer mine. Why should I not be allowed to possess firearms???
-
- Wing commander
- Posts: 467
- Joined: Sun May 26, 2013 11:50 am
Re: Gun Legislation
Chicago...look it up.O Really wrote:So Roland - if you don't like my broad-brush numbers, and you don't like Vrede's more detailed and specific numbers, let's see yours. Show us that NYC has higher gun violence than other more gun-friendly cities. In fact, show us any credible data that shows a positive correlation between restrictive gun laws and increased gun violence. We'll wait.
- O Really
- Admiral
- Posts: 23182
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm
Re: Gun Legislation
What about Chicago? We all know some areas of Chicago have among the highest crime and violent crime rate in the country - almost as high as Spartanburg. Show us the data. I don't have to look up data to support your point. If you have a point, support it yourself.Roland Deschain wrote:Chicago...look it up.O Really wrote:So Roland - if you don't like my broad-brush numbers, and you don't like Vrede's more detailed and specific numbers, let's see yours. Show us that NYC has higher gun violence than other more gun-friendly cities. In fact, show us any credible data that shows a positive correlation between restrictive gun laws and increased gun violence. We'll wait.
- Ombudsman
- Ensign
- Posts: 1268
- Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2013 1:03 pm
Re: Gun Legislation
Well Roland, for one thing there's your temper. Should a person as temperamental as you be allowed a firearm? There's also your deception? Should someone who can't be trusted to be truthful be allowed to own a firearm? There's also some psychiatric concerns. For instance, your anger over being caught at your deception, instead of shame, as a normal person would feel, indicates possible psychopathic tendencies.
But I do like that you offered some conditions as to why you should be allowed firearms. This indicates that you acknowledge that there are reasons a person shouldn't be allowed to own guns. So you do agree that gun control is necessary. So where do you draw the line? What should prevent someone from owning a tool designed to kill?
But I do like that you offered some conditions as to why you should be allowed firearms. This indicates that you acknowledge that there are reasons a person shouldn't be allowed to own guns. So you do agree that gun control is necessary. So where do you draw the line? What should prevent someone from owning a tool designed to kill?
Wing nuts. Not just for breakfast anymore.
- O Really
- Admiral
- Posts: 23182
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm
Re: Gun Legislation
Those are questions the hard core gun, ummm "enthusiasts' arent' going to answer. Admitting that anyone, no matter how looney, should be restricted from owning whatever weapon s/he wants means just one step closer to "Obama coming to take our guns."
- Ombudsman
- Ensign
- Posts: 1268
- Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2013 1:03 pm
- Stinger
- Sub-Lieutenant
- Posts: 1944
- Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 10:18 pm
Re: Gun Legislation
Was it Dolt-ective Thorn or Butt Ugly who could never figure out that someone making an assertion was responsible for providing evidence when asked?O Really wrote:[If you have a point, support it yourself.
I kind of think it was Butt Ugly, but he didn't really believe in facts ... just his "original ideas" -- i.e. fabricated bullshit.
Anyway, it's a common trait of the lazy, indolent, and uninformed.
- Ombudsman
- Ensign
- Posts: 1268
- Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2013 1:03 pm
Re: Gun Legislation
Roland reminds me of a 30 something woman fresh off a divorce who drank too much at a bar and slept with a frat boy and is now angry the kid doesn't want to have a relationship with her.
Wing nuts. Not just for breakfast anymore.