

Vrede wrote:So? Is it really about the "8.6 times as many kids" or is it just about Obama?Vrede wrote:Revised offer: No matter who is elected, if the program continues (we all know it will) are you up for doing the same with me at the first appropriate event we can, Wneglia? Two grayhaired medicos like us doing so will make for a great image and story. I'd even come to Columbia.Wneglia wrote:Let's take one step at a time. First let's see if Romney gets elected, then see if he continues Obama's policy.Vrede wrote:There's an offer on the table, Wneglia. You just gonna post about it instead?Vrede wrote:When Biden came to Asheville a friend deployed a "What About The Drones?" banner inside. He was quickly hustled out by security but not charged. If Mitten is elected and the program continues (we all know it will), are you up for doing the same with me at the first nearby Mitten or Ryan event we can, Wneglia? Two whitehaired medicos like us doing so will make for a great image and story.
CON and LIB -
What About The Drones?
It just ain't healthcare.
http://www.blueridgedebate.com/viewtopi ... =kill+list
Does that mean that it's OK to assassinate non-Americans abroad without judicial review?Vrede wrote:Tell President Obama: Assassinating Americans without due process is wrong.
The petition reads:
"The secret U.S. government assassination program that targets American citizens abroad and kills them without judicial review is not 'legal,' 'ethical,' or 'wise' as the White House claimed. It is wrong, and it should be stopped."
One Fourth of World's Countries Have Participated in Rendition and TortureVrede wrote:Yes, because we are the baddest bully around and there would be consequences. Plus, I think the citizens of most of our allies object to that kind of behavior more strongly than Americans do.rstrong wrote:Does that mean that it's OK to assassinate non-Americans abroad without judicial review?
"without judicial review?" - I think so. Whether it's "OK" as a matter of international law, morality, or our own interests is a different question.
If so, than is it OK for other countries to do the same? To kill an American citizen without judicial review as long as it's done outside their own country? Say, on a street in America?
We are indeed blazing that perilous trail.
What of kidnapping and torture, by allied countries? The US kidnapped at least 100 people from EU countries in the last decade. It was peachy-keen to kidnap and torture someone merely transiting a US airport on a connecting flight to Canada, on a vague suspicion (later disproven) that he might have a connection to terrorism. Is there any objection to allied countries snatching people off a US street and shipping them to another country for extra-judicial treatment?
If you refer to the Maher Arar case, no, Canada did not participate in rendition and torture.Wneglia wrote:including RStrong's Canada. It's not like Obama is alone in this.
It is about the collateral damage caused by the drones. I am not even opposed to targeted assassinations of terrorists like Bin Laden, but think they should be carried out with a Seal Team or CIA operatives.Vrede wrote:Thanks, shameful.Wneglia wrote:One Fourth of World's Countries Have Participated in Rendition and Torture
including RStrong's Canada. It's not like Obama is alone in this.
Who you callin' shameful?![]()
Obama has repudiated direct torture but is still practicing rendition to nations that torture. And, as been reported very recently, we continue to facilitate torture by the Afghan government.
How many of those other nations, the ones that are allies like Canada, are still doing rendition and/or torture? Not that I think their governments are necessarily better but I think their people may have been more repulsed when the ugly truths were revealed.
About my question? Is your opposition to drones really about the "8.6 times as many kids" or is it just about Obama?
Pakistan is opening an amusement park and zoo in the same town where Bin Laden was hiding. The zoo sounds cool, but I'll bet you won't be able to see the seals until it's too late.Wneglia wrote:I am not even opposed to targeted assassinations of terrorists like Bin Laden, but think they should be carried out with a Seal Team or CIA operatives.
Last week was the first time a seal has ever been recorded eating a hagfish, a lamprey-like creature so slimy other predators spit them out. It was spotted by a teenager in the Ukraine, watching an 800-kilometre network of cameras and instruments on the ocean floor off Vancouver Island connected to the internet.Vrede wrote:Speaking of which:rstrong wrote:...I'll bet you won't be able to see the seals until it's too late.
Shark-eating seal among rare and stunning scenes documented off South Africa
The number of innocents killed is relatively low, much lower than the number of innocents we killed in Iraq. Do you advocate not killing Al Qaeda leaders? Did you make similar posts about "collateral damage" in Iraq?Wneglia wrote: It is about the collateral damage caused by the drones. I am not even opposed to targeted assassinations of terrorists like Bin Laden, but think they should be carried out with a Seal Team or CIA operatives.
I don't think anything tops Abu Ghraib for recruiting new enemies of the United States.Vrede wrote: I'd add my concerns over any such violations of sovereignty, our world image, the precedent we're setting, and the numbers of future opponents being created.
In areas where drone strikes have killed innocent civilians, I'm 100% wrong.Vrede wrote:Worldwide you may be correct. In the countries targeted by drones I'm not so sure.Stinger wrote:I don't think anything tops Abu Ghraib for recruiting new enemies of the United States.Vrede wrote: I'd add my concerns over any such violations of sovereignty, our world image, the precedent we're setting, and the numbers of future opponents being created.
Well that’s not at all disturbing then.School of Medicine psychiatry professor Charles Morgan told the News in January that he hopes to propose the creation of a center at the Medical School in cooperation with the U.S. Army Special Operations Forces called the U.S. Special Operations Command Center of Excellence for Operational Neuroscience, which would teach soldiers interview techniques. Yale’s statement said the School of Medicine has not formally proposed opening the center, and denied media reports that the training facility will teach interrogation tactics and that the research will take advantage of minority populations in New Haven.
There we go. A former CIA station chief, one of those convicted by an Italian court of the kidnapping and torture of a terror suspect, has been captured in Panama.rstrong wrote:Does that mean that it's OK to assassinate non-Americans abroad without judicial review?Vrede wrote:Tell President Obama: Assassinating Americans without due process is wrong.
The petition reads:
"The secret U.S. government assassination program that targets American citizens abroad and kills them without judicial review is not 'legal,' 'ethical,' or 'wise' as the White House claimed. It is wrong, and it should be stopped."
If so, than is it OK for other countries to do the same? To kill an American citizen without judicial review as long as it's done outside their own country? Say, on a street in America?
What of kidnapping and torture, by allied countries? The US kidnapped at least 100 people from EU countries in the last decade. It was peachy-keen to kidnap and torture someone merely transiting a US airport on a connecting flight to Canada, on a vague suspicion (later disproven) that he might have a connection to terrorism. Is there any objection to allied countries snatching people off a US street and shipping them to another country for extra-judicial treatment?
[color=#FF0000]Wneglia[/color] wrote:It is about the collateral damage caused by the drones. I am not even opposed to targeted assassinations of terrorists like Bin Laden, but think they should be carried out with a Seal Team or CIA operatives.Vrede wrote:Thanks, shameful.Wneglia wrote:One Fourth of World's Countries Have Participated in Rendition and Torture
including RStrong's Canada. It's not like Obama is alone in this.
Who you callin' shameful?![]()
Obama has repudiated direct torture but is still practicing rendition to nations that torture. And, as been reported very recently, we continue to facilitate torture by the Afghan government.
How many of those other nations, the ones that are allies like Canada, are still doing rendition and/or torture? Not that I think their governments are necessarily better but I think their people may have been more repulsed when the ugly truths were revealed.
About my question? Is your opposition to drones really about the "8.6 times as many kids" or is it just about Obama?
Vrede wrote:Fwiw, I don't think Wneglia joined BRN until after Shrub was gone and his clear and longstanding opposition to drone policy does set him apart from many con hawks. He did answer my question by saying it's not about Obama.