Million Mask March Masks Manufactured in Brazilian Third World Sweatshop. Link

Isn't that where \V/ got his screen name?JTA wrote:I can't tell you why, but for some I've always hated the Guy Fawkes mask. When I see it, the first thing that comes to mind is that movie V for Vendetta where those terrorists succeeded in taking down the government so they could institute sharia law (even though this part is not actually in the movie its heavily implied).
It doesn't help that the first image I found when I searched "Million Mask March" had two of the guys wearing fedora hats.
Conspiracy theory time fellas: Time Warner apparently owns the rights to the Guy Fawkes mask. Do they get a cut whenever one of those masks is sold? Here's how it all went down:Ombudsman wrote:Isn't that where \V/ got his screen name?JTA wrote:I can't tell you why, but for some I've always hated the Guy Fawkes mask. When I see it, the first thing that comes to mind is that movie V for Vendetta where those terrorists succeeded in taking down the government so they could institute sharia law (even though this part is not actually in the movie its heavily implied).
It doesn't help that the first image I found when I searched "Million Mask March" had two of the guys wearing fedora hats.
Ombudsman wrote:Isn't that where \V/ got his screen name?JTA wrote:I can't tell you why, but for some I've always hated the Guy Fawkes mask. When I see it, the first thing that comes to mind is that movie V for Vendetta where those terrorists succeeded in taking down the government so they could institute sharia law (even though this part is not actually in the movie its heavily implied).
It doesn't help that the first image I found when I searched "Million Mask March" had two of the guys wearing fedora hats.
Flight attendants are not what they were when I first flew on an airliner.Vrede wrote:U.S. Airways Passengers Rally Around Blind Man Booted Off Flight
What I really like about this story is that the other passengers chose solidarity over meek acceptance.
Adobe spokeswoman Heather Edell said she was not familiar with the FBI report. She added that the company has found that the majority of attacks involving its software have exploited programs that were not updated with the latest security patches.
Those cases have been winding their way through the courts.rstrong wrote:Anonymous responded to WikiLeaks' VISA accounts being shut down by enlisting followers to download and run a Denial of Service tool. It didn't take skills; only gullibility.Vrede wrote:Middle ground? - The hacktivists are not protected by numbers if they're sloppy and/or it's an effective enough hack but, given that they are by definition internet savvy, it's not like they are innocent dupes. They know or should know the risks.
Almost none of the 88+ arrested (plus 40 more served with search warrants and warned by the FBI) were skilled hackers who knew the risks. Many of the arrested LulzSec members were not skilled hackers who knew the risks.
They were otherwise innocent dupes, conned by Anonymous's b*llsh*t claims of protection through anonymity, strength in numbers and brotherhood and sisterhood.
But since \V/ will no doubt play dumb and pretend to misinterpret my post, I'll state the obvious: The penalty is ridiculous, from a court beneath contempt rather than above it. By that standard the only thing between the Koch Brothers themselves and a half-million year prison sentence is a refusal to prosecute the rich and powerful.Eric J. Rosol, 38, is said to have admitted that on Feb. 28, 2011, he took part in a denial of service attack for about a minute on a Web page of Koch Industries -- Kochind.com, using software called a Low Orbit Ion Cannon Code, which was loaded on his computer
Rosol, who pleaded guilty to one misdemeanor count of accessing a protected computer, was sentenced to two years of federal probation and ordered to pay US$183,000 in restitution, the Department of Justice said in a statement.