Mr.B wrote:The 'version' I use doesn't involves saints, statues, martyrs, and a chain of command dressed in glittering attire......
I apologize that my ignorance is so overwhelming....to you, that is; O'Great One Who Is So Well-Versed in All That Concerns Religion.
Haha, that's funny. Thanks for the link Mr.B. I checked it out, might use it myself. There's some great links that perfectly describe most of these
self-important liberal idiots, you know, the ones who are legends in their own mind.
Proudly Telling It Like It Is: In Your Face! Whether You Like It Or Not!
Interesting question. Sure, she deserved to be killed - and painfully. But the real question is whether the government not trusted to handle analysis of phone records and widely considered to be incompetent in many large endeavors should be the one to kill off one of its citizens.
Interesting question. Sure, she deserved to be killed - and painfully. But the real question is whether the government not trusted to handle analysis of phone records and widely considered to be incompetent in many large endeavors should be the one to kill off one of its citizens.
You popped the real question, now answer it. Who should be entrusted to carry out the execution since this woman deserved to be killed - and painfully you said, as in what method?
Proudly Telling It Like It Is: In Your Face! Whether You Like It Or Not!
Vrede wrote:Just because you "deserve" to have your rights restricted and be treated with the same childish bile that you heap on others doesn't mean I would do so or would want government doing so, homerfobe. The health of society in the long run is more important.
Yeah, based on his vitriol, I'd say Homo "deserves" to be bumphucked by six very large "bucks" but I wouldn't think it's a good idea for the government to get involved or supervise the process.
