Now, I know some here are going to go into Whine'nSnivel mode, and throw a tantrum over it:
Was that a Whine, or a Snivel, or both?
To be fair, I didn't provide specifics or links; just a summary of the controversy and my opinion of it. But I did go to one of those fortune tellers today that I've alluded to previously; when I asked her if she knew I was coming in, she admitted she did not. Her name was Imogene Indago; her sign was impressive and colorful, but devoid of any sort of special insight or even basic comprehension. She also had numerous alliterative signs inside her shop that gave the illusion of clever abilities, but the entire experience was fouled due to the fact that she did not know I would show up today. I almost felt sorry for her; almost.Vrede wrote:Vrede wrote:... indago threw a tantrum and replied in Whine'nSnivel mode without having the balls to address what the articles he linked actually said ...I won't bother being available for accepting indago's apology. It's clear that he's too much of an illiterate wuss for that.Vrede wrote:The pattern: I (or neoplacebo) post specifics with links, quotes and coherent analysis, indago stamps his foot and whines, "Uh-uh!" without even attempting to back up his hallucinations and fantasies.
I don't believe those roadside fortune tellers have supernatural abilities any more than the circus ones do, but to be fair, they don't claim their seeing ability is limitless, and generally wouldn't begin until they have a subject/person to focus on. I do think some people are more perceptive/better listeners/observers than others, and if they're good enough at it they can get jobs with the California Bureau of Investigation, along with a hot girlfriend.neoplacebo wrote:To be fair, I didn't provide specifics or links; just a summary of the controversy and my opinion of it. But I did go to one of those fortune tellers today that I've alluded to previously; when I asked her if she knew I was coming in, she admitted she did not. Her name was Imogene Indago; her sign was impressive and colorful, but devoid of any sort of special insight or even basic comprehension. She also had numerous alliterative signs inside her shop that gave the illusion of clever abilities, but the entire experience was fouled due to the fact that she did not I would show up today. I almost felt sorry for her; almost.Vrede wrote:Vrede wrote:... indago threw a tantrum and replied in Whine'nSnivel mode without having the balls to address what the articles he linked actually said ...I won't bother being available for accepting indago's apology. It's clear that he's too much of an illiterate wuss for that.Vrede wrote:The pattern: I (or neoplacebo) post specifics with links, quotes and coherent analysis, indago stamps his foot and whines, "Uh-uh!" without even attempting to back up his hallucinations and fantasies.
I will be able to say I knew you were coming, then. Better get to work on my sign.Vrede wrote:![]()
I included you because of the "coherent analysis", something indago is incapable of.
(I'll be dropping by soon)
Yeah, but if I were a roadside fortune teller, the first goddam thing I'd say to those who enter is "Most humble greetings. I knew you were coming today. How may I help you?"O Really wrote:I don't believe those roadside fortune tellers have supernatural abilities any more than the circus ones do, but to be fair, they don't claim their seeing ability is limitless, and generally wouldn't begin until they have a subject/person to focus on. I do think some people are more perceptive/better listeners/observers than others, and if they're good enough at it they can get jobs with the California Bureau of Investigation, along with a hot girlfriend.
I knew you were going to say that. Seventy five dollars, please.indago wrote:Now, that doesn't look like an apology to me! I'm beginning to think that you guys are ungrateful that I gave you this heartfelt opportunity to apologize, and all I get are the WhineySnivels, and all ButtHurt over it.
I myself don't dwell on the past; it's over. I focus on the future, my hominy. And I see rats; rats as big as Buicks in a frenzy. Best find shelter, hominy boy.indago wrote:Remember what I wrote about posting the same thing over, and over, and over...Vrede wrote:
Of course you did, and it's because you have a guilty conscience. You know you should apologize, but you won't because you are so dishonest. But you still have a chance to repent, and redeem yourself. Go for it!neoplacebo wrote:I knew you were going to say that.
indago wrote:Of course you did, and it's because you have a guilty conscience. You know you should apologize, but you won't because you are so dishonest. But you still have a chance to repent, and redeem yourself. Go for it!neoplacebo wrote:I knew you were going to say that.
And besides that, who of any credibility is going to believe your cheap bullshit when the facts that I have posted are readily available? It's even written into the complaint filed with the court:indago wrote:Remember what I wrote about posting the same thing over, and over, and over...Vrede wrote:
27. Based upon the aforementioned facts and circumstances, all of Jennifer's therapists and experts agree that for her psychological and parental well-being, she must relocate to a racially diverse community with good schools.
I'll be damned......and honest. I specifically said in one of my earlier posts that the women mentioned in your original story link were moving to a COMMUNITY MORE RACIALLY TOLERANT; NOT A COMMUNITY MORE TOLERANT OF HOMOSEXUAL COUPLES. What the fuck is wrong with you? By the way, I don't require or expect an apology.....apologists are losers trying to compensate for inadequacies.indago wrote:And besides that, who of any credibility is going to believe your cheap bullshit when the facts that I have posted are readily available? It's even written into the complaint filed with the court:indago wrote:Remember what I wrote about posting the same thing over, and over, and over...Vrede wrote:
27. Based upon the aforementioned facts and circumstances, all of Jennifer's therapists and experts agree that for her psychological and parental well-being, she must relocate to a racially diverse community with good schools.
Some seem to think you did. Are you saying you agree that their being lesbians is irrelevant to the story?indago wrote:Who said they were?O Really wrote:They weren't suing because they were lesbians. They weren't suing to move somewhere more lesbian-friendly.
I see; and who would that be?O Really wrote:Some seem to think you did.indago wrote:Who said they were?O Really wrote:They weren't suing because they were lesbians. They weren't suing to move somewhere more lesbian-friendly.
Really? You can't possibly be that stupid.indago wrote:I see; and who would that be?O Really wrote:Some seem to think you did.indago wrote:Who said they were?O Really wrote:They weren't suing because they were lesbians. They weren't suing to move somewhere more lesbian-friendly.