Why is Obama still lying about this?
-
- Wing commander
- Posts: 485
- Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2012 4:39 am
Re: Why is Obama still lying about this?
Sorry about the spelling of Panetta. Didn't realize the Vred would go off so deep.
Vred, go to your favorite source of information and google Stars and Strips "Gen Hamm".
Yep, we are approaching critical mass.
Vred, go to your favorite source of information and google Stars and Strips "Gen Hamm".
Yep, we are approaching critical mass.
- gongoozler
- Pilot Officer
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 10:18 pm
Re: Why is Obama still lying about this?
The Spelling Nazi cares about spelling.Vrede wrote:It's not the instance, it's the regularity of them and the rarity with which they are admitted.Vrede wrote:"Penatta"? Another military screw-up by Big FUBAR Reality....Reality wrote:...Penatta
-
- Wing commander
- Posts: 485
- Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2012 4:39 am
Re: Why is Obama still lying about this?
Don't bother GG, the Vred thinks she knows something about the US Military but she only knows what she reads on wiki or some other source she uses.
You can tell when the Vred is panicking. She will say anything to divert attention from her gaffes especially when she is losing ground in a thread like she is in this one. I expect anytime now we will get a name change; Harpo, Dalton Trumbow, Ms Construed, to name a few could show up.
Note how she tries to take a spelling error and make it into a major catastrophe. Favorite lib tactic.
You can tell when the Vred is panicking. She will say anything to divert attention from her gaffes especially when she is losing ground in a thread like she is in this one. I expect anytime now we will get a name change; Harpo, Dalton Trumbow, Ms Construed, to name a few could show up.
Note how she tries to take a spelling error and make it into a major catastrophe. Favorite lib tactic.
- gongoozler
- Pilot Officer
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 10:18 pm
Re: Why is Obama still lying about this?
I've noticed that it also repeats itself a lot.Reality wrote:Don't bother GG, the Vred thinks she knows something about the US Military but she only knows what she reads on wiki or some other source she uses.
You can tell when the Vred is panicking. She will say anything to divert attention from her gaffes especially when she is losing ground in a thread like she is in this one. I expect anytime now we will get a name change; Harpo, Dalton Trumbow, Ms Construed, to name a few could show up.
Note how she tries to take a spelling error and make it into a major catastrophe. Favorite lib tactic.
- Stinger
- Sub-Lieutenant
- Posts: 1944
- Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 10:18 pm
Re: Why is Obama still lying about this?
That's only for Big Dumbass because Big Dumbass does it to others.gongoozler wrote:The Spelling Nazi cares about spelling.Vrede wrote:It's not the instance, it's the regularity of them and the rarity with which they are admitted.Vrede wrote:"Penatta"? Another military screw-up by Big FUBAR Reality....Reality wrote:...Penatta
- Stinger
- Sub-Lieutenant
- Posts: 1944
- Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 10:18 pm
Re: Why is Obama still lying about this?
One: I don't always post when she does.Reality wrote:Stinger, if you are not Vrede why do you always post when she does and why are you so quick to come to her defense.
Two: I don't "come to her defense." She doesn't need my help. The nerve endings in her little toe are enough to handle you. I simply reiterate facts in the face of your knee-jerk supposition.
The facts don't change from poster to poster. The facts are the same when I post them as when Vrede posts them as when O Really posts them and as when Thorn would if he accidentally posted the facts.
Facts aren't some malleable concepts that every poster molds into "original ideas," and their validity does not depend on whether or not you really, really, really, really, really JUST BELIEVE them or not. They're still true even if you don't believe them.
I said that in an attempt to make a point. I totally forgot to whom I was speaking. Sorry about that.
- Bungalow Bill
- Ensign
- Posts: 1340
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 8:12 pm
- Location: Downtown Mills River
- mike
- Lieutenant Colonel
- Posts: 652
- Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 7:47 pm
Re: Why is Obama still lying about this?
Wow ... I guess we can add paranoia to BU's list of issues ...Reality wrote:Stinger, if you are not Vrede why do you always post when she does and why are you so quick to come to her defense.

- Stinger
- Sub-Lieutenant
- Posts: 1944
- Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 10:18 pm
Re: Why is Obama still lying about this?
Well, he's got so many serious mental issues that we don't really worry about the paranoia.mike wrote:Wow ... I guess we can add paranoia to BU's list of issues ...Reality wrote:Stinger, if you are not Vrede why do you always post when she does and why are you so quick to come to her defense.
The dumbanoia is his major malfunction.
- O Really
- Admiral
- Posts: 23170
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm
Re: Why is Obama still lying about this?
Here's the thing - it's nice to say, in theory, that whoever is at the top of the food chain is responsible for everything that happens below. But the fact is, most CEO's (or POTUSes) know relatively few details of what people do more than a couple of levels or so below them. True, the top executive sets a tone, and may set some policies, but most of the time are not that directly responsible if somebody off in the hinterlands makes a poor decision. Point being, I don't know what Obama knew and when he knew it with regard to this incident. And I doubt anyone else here does either. But if anyone wants to use the "buck stops here" theory to blame Obama, fine. Thinking it's a direct action and a tin-foil worthy conspiracy is entirely something else. Reminds me of something Lyndon Johnson said when everyone was on his ass, "if I went out and walked across the Potomac, they'd say 'the President can't swim'"
-
- Wing commander
- Posts: 485
- Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2012 4:39 am
Re: Why is Obama still lying about this?
Nice try O'Really but the buck does stop at the White House on this one. Are you and the others so naive or so protetcive of Obama that you are convinced he did not know that one of our embassies was under attack and that Americans had been killed and yes the CEO of a major corporation does get fired if the corportaion he leads takes a major hit. Some go to jail.
Wonder why Hillary has been so quiet lately?
Wonder why Hillary has been so quiet lately?
- Stinger
- Sub-Lieutenant
- Posts: 1944
- Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 10:18 pm
Re: Why is Obama still lying about this?
Reality wrote:Nice try O'Really but the buck does stop at the White House on this one. Are you and the others so naive or so protetcive of Obama that you are convinced he did not know that one of our embassies was under attack and that Americans had been killed and yes the CEO of a major corporation does get fired if the corportaion he leads takes a major hit. Some go to jail.
Nice straw man to try to add some credibility to your ignorant supposition, but no one has claimed that Obama didn't know the embassy was under attack. Obama has stated that he knew the embassy was under attack.
Please try again.
The fact that you don't understand chain of command doesn't lend any credibility to your attempted argument. The fact that your hatred for Obama clouds any critical judgment you might have (being extremely generous here), making you prone to spouting ignorant, unhinged assertions about Obama doesn't add any cred to your rant, either.
Wonder why Hillary has been so quiet lately?
Please keep your obsessions to yourself. We really don't want to know.
-
- Red Shirt
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 8:50 pm
Re: Why is Obama still lying about this?
And W knew that planes were being flown into various structures on 9/11. Why didn't he stop it after the first plane? That makes about as much as sense as what you people are saying.
- Colonel Taylor
- Marshal
- Posts: 994
- Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 8:51 pm
Re: Why is Obama still lying about this?
Well we see you must be embarrassed by her too. Finally a good call by a liberal!Stinger wrote:Reality wrote:Nice try O'Really but the buck does stop at the White House on this one. Are you and the others so naive or so protetcive of Obama that you are convinced he did not know that one of our embassies was under attack and that Americans had been killed and yes the CEO of a major corporation does get fired if the corportaion he leads takes a major hit. Some go to jail.
Nice straw man to try to add some credibility to your ignorant supposition, but no one has claimed that Obama didn't know the embassy was under attack. Obama has stated that he knew the embassy was under attack.
Please try again.
The fact that you don't understand chain of command doesn't lend any credibility to your attempted argument. The fact that your hatred for Obama clouds any critical judgment you might have (being extremely generous here), making you prone to spouting ignorant, unhinged assertions about Obama doesn't add any cred to your rant, either.
Wonder why Hillary has been so quiet lately?
Please keep your obsessions to yourself. We really don't want to know.
- Stinger
- Sub-Lieutenant
- Posts: 1944
- Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 10:18 pm
Re: Why is Obama still lying about this?
Not at all. But I am embarrassed by your stupidity, what with us being the same species and all.Colonel Taylor wrote:Well we see you must be embarrassed by her too. Finally a good call by a liberal!Stinger wrote:Reality wrote:Nice try O'Really but the buck does stop at the White House on this one. Are you and the others so naive or so protetcive of Obama that you are convinced he did not know that one of our embassies was under attack and that Americans had been killed and yes the CEO of a major corporation does get fired if the corportaion he leads takes a major hit. Some go to jail.
Nice straw man to try to add some credibility to your ignorant supposition, but no one has claimed that Obama didn't know the embassy was under attack. Obama has stated that he knew the embassy was under attack.
Please try again.
The fact that you don't understand chain of command doesn't lend any credibility to your attempted argument. The fact that your hatred for Obama clouds any critical judgment you might have (being extremely generous here), making you prone to spouting ignorant, unhinged assertions about Obama doesn't add any cred to your rant, either.
Wonder why Hillary has been so quiet lately?
Please keep your obsessions to yourself. We really don't want to know.
You do have opposable thumbs, don't you?
-
- Red Shirt
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2012 9:42 am
Re: Why is Obama still lying about this?
Why didn't he get those poor people help? Why didn't he protect them.Stinger wrote: Obama has stated that he knew the embassy was under attack.
Please try again.
- Stinger
- Sub-Lieutenant
- Posts: 1944
- Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 10:18 pm
Re: Why is Obama still lying about this?
Because he doesn't have a blue suit with a red cape.nobody wrote:Why didn't he get those poor people help? Why didn't he protect them.Stinger wrote: Obama has stated that he knew the embassy was under attack.
Please try again.
- Colonel Taylor
- Marshal
- Posts: 994
- Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 8:51 pm
Re: Why is Obama still lying about this?
Na I think it was more important for him to get to campaigning and raising money.Stinger wrote:Because he doesn't have a blue suit with a red cape.nobody wrote:Why didn't he get those poor people help? Why didn't he protect them.Stinger wrote: Obama has stated that he knew the embassy was under attack.
Please try again.

- Stinger
- Sub-Lieutenant
- Posts: 1944
- Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 10:18 pm
Re: Why is Obama still lying about this?
See. That's why I'm embarrassed over your stupidity. He wasn't out campaigning and raising money.Colonel Taylor wrote:Na I think it was more important for him to get to campaigning and raising money.Stinger wrote:Because he doesn't have a blue suit with a red cape.nobody wrote:Why didn't he get those poor people help? Why didn't he protect them.Stinger wrote: Obama has stated that he knew the embassy was under attack.
Please try again.
You never did answer the question about opposable thumbs.
-
- Wing commander
- Posts: 485
- Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2012 4:39 am
Re: Why is Obama still lying about this?
Brother said; "And W knew that planes were being flown into various structures on 9/11. Why didn't he stop it after the first plane? That makes about as much as sense as what you people are saying."
Hey Bro, I guess you expected W to give the order to shoot down every commerical aircraft that was airborne over the US after the first one hit the Tower.
Obama, had time to react and assist those under attack or trying to defend US territory. I don't know the actual time it took for all commercial aircraft to land when the 9/11 attack was underway thereby eliminating that threat. Do you? According to the infromation now made piblic the Americans engaged at Benghazi were still fighting and asking for assistance hours after the initial attack. Time and forces were available to react and Obama's Administration stuck their head in the sand and let the defenders die without making an effort to save them.
As for you Stinker, tell us your interpretation of the chain of command. Do the War Fighting CINCS reprot to SECDEF or to Obama? What are the actual duties of the Commander in Chief, MAJCOM Commanders, and The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs?
Glad to read that you now understand and acknowledge that Obama was fully aware that our embassy was under attack and elected to do nothing. Maybe when he finally admits that it was he that gave the order to stand down and gives a truthful explanation as to why he did so, he and the rest of us can learn from what happened and establish procedures to not let it happen again.
Hey Bro, I guess you expected W to give the order to shoot down every commerical aircraft that was airborne over the US after the first one hit the Tower.
Obama, had time to react and assist those under attack or trying to defend US territory. I don't know the actual time it took for all commercial aircraft to land when the 9/11 attack was underway thereby eliminating that threat. Do you? According to the infromation now made piblic the Americans engaged at Benghazi were still fighting and asking for assistance hours after the initial attack. Time and forces were available to react and Obama's Administration stuck their head in the sand and let the defenders die without making an effort to save them.
As for you Stinker, tell us your interpretation of the chain of command. Do the War Fighting CINCS reprot to SECDEF or to Obama? What are the actual duties of the Commander in Chief, MAJCOM Commanders, and The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs?
Glad to read that you now understand and acknowledge that Obama was fully aware that our embassy was under attack and elected to do nothing. Maybe when he finally admits that it was he that gave the order to stand down and gives a truthful explanation as to why he did so, he and the rest of us can learn from what happened and establish procedures to not let it happen again.