Roundup: Trump-Era Deregulation in the Courts
The Institute for Policy Integrity tracks the outcomes of litigation over the Trump administration’s deregulatory efforts in this Roundup. The Roundup includes litigation over federal agency rule suspensions; repeals; rescissions; efforts to weaken regulations through guidance, memoranda, amendments, or replacements; and other agency actions.
Unsuccessful - 39, 93%
An outcome is considered unsuccessful for the Trump administration if (1) a court ruled against the agency or (2) the relevant agency withdrew the action after being sued. If there are different rulings on the same deregulatory action, the entry is assigned an “X” as long as one court ruled against the agency.
Successful - 3, 7%
An outcome is considered successful for the Trump administration if the agency won the lawsuit without having to withdraw the challenged action, whether or not that win was on purely procedural grounds (such as mootness) or on the merits.
What part of "illegal" does 45SHOLE not understand?
The cases are detailed at the link. Here's the tally of our successful champions:
Natural Resources Defense Council - 5, Natural Resources Defense Council, et al. - 1
California - 4, State of California, et al. - 1, Regents of the University of California - 1
Pennsylvania - 1
New York, et al. - 1
Clean Air Carolina - 1
South Carolina Coastal Conservation League - 1
Friends of Alaska, et al. - 1
Air Alliance Houston - 1
“NGO Plaintiffs” coalition - 1
Clean Air Council - 1
American Lung Association - 1
Becerra - 1
Clean Water Action - 1
Center for Science in the Public Interest - 1
National Venture Capital Association - 1
Open Communities Alliance - 1
Sierra Club - 1
Pineros y Campesinos Unidos del Noroeste - 1
Healthy Teen Network - 1
Environmental Defense Fund, et al. - 1
League of United Latin American Citizens - 1
Bauer - 1
Ramos - 1
Paralyzed Veterans of America, Inc. - 1
Oceana, Inc. - 1
National Women’s Law Center - 1
Citizens for Clean Energy, et al. - 1
United Steel, et al. - 1